Effect of photoperiod treatments on phytochrome a levels and its mRNA abundance in photoperiod-sensitive genic male-sterile rice mutant and the wild type

Acta Botanica Sinica

Volumn 39, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 914-921

  Wang, Wei ^a,b   Hong, Yu ^a   Tong, Zhe ^a   Kuang, Ting Yun ^a   Tang, Pei Song ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^b XIAMEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; Male sterility; mRNA abundance; Oryza sativa; Photoperiod; Phytochrome; RNA dot blot

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006045394     PISSN: 05777496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Tong Z, Wang T, Xu Y. Evidence for involvement of phytochrome regulation in male sterility of a mutant of Oryza sativa L. Photochem Photobiol, 1990. 52:161-164
2. Furuya M. Phytochromes: their molecular species, gene families, and function. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1993. 44:617-645
3. Pratt P H. Distribution and localization of phytochrome within plant. In: Kendrick R E, Kronenberg G H M eds., Photomorphogenesis in Plants. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994. 163-185
4. Dehesh K, Tepperman J, Christennsen A H et al. PhyB is evolutionarily conserved and consititutively expressed in rice seedlings. Mol Gen Genet, 1991. 225:305-333
5. Shimazaki Y, Cordonnier M, Pratt L H. Phytochrome quantitation in crude extracts of Avena by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with monoclonal antibodies. Planta, 1983. 159:534-544
6. Hilton J R, Thomas B. Photoregulation of phytochrome synthesis in germinating embryos of Avena sativa L. J Exp Bot, 1987. 38:1704-1712
7. Carr-Smith H D, Johnson C B, Plumpton C et al. The kinetics of type 1 phytochrome in green-light grown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Planta, 1994. 194:136-142
8. Pratt L H, Stewart S J, Shimazaki Y et al. Monoclonal antibodies directed to phytochrome from green leaves of Avena sativa L. cross-react weakly or not at all with the phytochrome that is abundant in etiolated shoots of the same species. Planta, 1991. 184:87-95
9. Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem, 1976. 72:248-254
10. 6:1-13
11. Principe J M, Hruschka W R, Thomas B et al. Protein differences between two isogenic cultivars of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) that differ in sensitivity to photoperiod and far-red light. Plant Physiol, 1992. 98:1444-1450
12. Vince-Prue D. Photomorphogenesis and flowering. In: Shropshir W Jr, Mohr H eds., Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, Vol 16B. Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 1983. 457-490
13. Quail P H. Phytochrome genes and their expression. In: Kendrick R E, Kronenberg G H M eds., Photomorphogenesis in Plants. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994. 71-104
14. Sharrock R A, Quail P H. Novel phytochrome sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana: Structure, evolution, and differential expression of a plant regulatory photoreceptor family. Genes Dev, 1989. 3:1745-1757
15. Clack T, Mathews S, Sharrock R A. The phytochrome apoprotein family in Arabidopsis is encoded by five genes: The sequences and expression of PHYD and PHYE. Plant Mol Biol, 1994. 25:413-427
16. Kilby N J, Ottoline Leyser H M, Furner I J. Promoter methylation and progressive transgene inactivation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol, 1992. 20:103-112
17. Saluz H P, Feavers I M, Jiricny J et al. Genomic sequencing and in vivo footprinting of an expression-specific DNase I-hypersensitive site of avian vitellogenin II promoter reveal a demethylation of a mCpG and a change in specific interactions of proteins with DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1988, 85:6697-6700
18. Nagatani A, Kay S A, Deak M et al. Rice type I phytochrome regulates hypocotyl elongation in transgenic tobacco seedlings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1991. 88:5207-5211
19. Whitelam G C, McCormac A C, Boylan M T et al. Photoresponses of Arabidopsis seedlings expressing an introduced oat phy A cDNA: Persistence of etiolated plant type responses in light-grown plants. Photochem Photobiol, 1992. 56:617-622