Drought effects on canopy properties and productivity in thinned and unthinned Turkey oak stands

Plant Biosystems

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 59-65

  Cutini, A ^a  

^a Istituto Sperimentale Selvicoltura   (Italy)

Author keywords

Canopy; Drought; Leaf area index; Productivity; Thinning

Indexed keywords

QUERCUS CERRIS;

EID: 0006038575     PISSN: 11263504     EISSN: 17245575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11263504.1997.10654167     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Amorini E. & Fabbio G., 1988. L’avviamento all’altofusto nei cedui a prevalenza di ceno. Risultati di una prova sperimentale a 15 anni dalla sua impostazione. Primo contributo. Ann. 1st. Sper. Selv. 21 (1986): 5-101.
2. Aussenac G. & Granier A., 1988. Effects of thinning on water stress and growth in Douglas-fir. Can. Jour. For. Res. 18: 100-105.
3. Black T.A., Tan C.S. & Nyamah J.U., 1980. Transpiration rate of Douglas fir trees in thinned and unthinned stands. Can. Jour. Soil. Sci. 60: 625-631.
4. Bolstad P.V. & Gower S.T., 1990. Estimation of leaf area index in fourteen southern Wisconsin forest stands using a portable radiometer. Tree Physiology 7: 115-124.
5. CAMPBELL G.S., 1986. Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution. Agric. For. Meteor. 36: 317-321.
6. Cannell M.G.R., Milne R., Sheppard L.J. & Unsworth M.H., 1987. Radiation interception and productivity of willow. J. Appi. Ecol. 24: 261-278.
7. Chiarello N.R., Mooney H.A. & Williams K., 1989. Growth, carbon allocation and cost of plant tissue. In: PEARCY et al., (ed), Plant physiological ecology, Chapman and Hall.
8. Di Tommaso P.L. & Sartini F., 1988. Il bosco di Renzano. Ann. Acc. Ital. Sci. For. 37: 95-109.
9. Dreyer E., Epron D. & Yog Matig O.E., 1992. Photochemical efficiency of photosystem II in a rapidly dehydrating leaves of 11 temperate and tropical tree species differing in their tolerance to drought. Ann. Sci. For. 49: 615-625.
10. Epron D., Dreyer E. & Aussenac G., 1993. A comparison of photosynthetic responses to water stress in seedlings from 3 oak species: Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl, Q rubra L and Q cerris L. Ann. Sci. For. 50, Suppl 1: 48s-60s.
11. Gholz H.L., 1982. Environmental limits on aboveground net primary production, leaf area and biomass in vegetation zones of the Pacific Northwest. Ecology 63: 469-481.
12. Grignetti A., Vitale M. & Manes F., 1994. Studio ecofisiologico condotto su aree permanenti in cerrete miste di origine cedua. Ann. 1st. Sper. Selv. 98 (1992): 101-146.
13. Guidi G., 1976. Primi risultati di una prova di conversione in un ceduo matricinato di cerro Quercus cerris LJ. Ann. 1st. Sper. Selv. Vol. 4 (1975): 253-278.
14. Hinckley TM, Teskey R.O., Duhme F. & Richter H., 1981. Temperate hardwood forests. In Kozlowsky T. T., Water Deficits and plant growth. Academic Press, Inc. New York pp: 154-208.
15. Jarvis P.G. & Leverenz J.W., 1983. Productivity of temperate, deciduous and evergreen forests. In: Physiological plant ecology, Enc. of Plant Physiology, 12D, Lange O.L. et al. (eds). Spriger Verlag, Berlin.
16. JOHANSSON T., 1989. Irradiance within the canopies of young trees of European aspen Populus tremulaj and European birch in stands of different spacing. For. Ecol. Manag. 28: 217-236.
17. KASANGA H. & MONSI N., 1954. On the light transmission of leaves and its meaning for the production of matter in plant communities. Jap. Jour. Bot. 14: 304-324.
18. KESTEMONT P., 1971. Productivité primaire des taillis simples et concept de nécromasse. In “Productivity of forest ecosystems”. UNESCO. Proceedings of Brussels Symposium 27-31 October 1969, ed. by P. Duvigneaud, Vol. 4:271-279.
19. MONSI M. & SAEKI T., 1953. Uber den lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung fur die Stoffproduktion. Jap. Jour. Bot. 14: 22-52.
20. MONTEITH J.L., 1977. Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 281: 277-294.
21. Norman J.M. & Jarvis P.G., 1974. Photosynthesis in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis [Bong.] Carr.). J. Appl. Ecol. 11: 375-398.
22. PEREIRA J.S., 1994. Physiological responses to drought in Mediterranean oaks. In: Proceedings of Int. Symposium “Environmental constraints and oaks: Ecological and physiological aspects”. Aug. 29-Sep. 1, Nancy.
23. SAEKI T., 1960. Interrelationships between leaf amount, light distribution and total photosynthesis in a plant community. Bot. Mag. (Tokio) 73: 55-63.
24. SATOO T., 1971. Primary production relations of coniferous forests in Japan. In “Productivity of forest ecosystems”. UNESCO. Proceedings of Brussels Symposium 27-31 October 1969, ed. by P. Duvigneaud, Vol. 4:191-205.
25. Scarascia Mugnozza G., Valentini R., Spinelli R. & GIORDANO E., 1988. Osservazioni sul ciclo dell’acqua in un bosco ceduo di Quercus cerris L. Ann. Acc. It. Sci. For. 37: 3-21.
26. Smith F.W., Sampson D.A. & Long J.N., 1991. Comparison of leaf area index estimates from tree allometrics and measured light interception. Forest Science 37(6): 1682-1688.
27. Susmel L., 1988. Prinripi di ecohgia. CLEUP, Padova:1206.
28. VANSEVEREN J.P., 1969. Recherches sur l’écosystème foret, Série B: La chenaie mélangée calcicole de Virelles-Blaimont. Contribution n. 30: L’index foliare et sa mesure par photoplanimétrie. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg. 102: 373-385.
29. Waring R.H., 1983. Estimating forest growth and efficiency in relation to canopy leaf area. Adv. Ecol. Res. 13: 327-354.