General risk constraints

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 31-47

  Ekenberg, Love ^a   Boman, Magnus ^b   Linnerooth Bayer, Joanne ^c  

^a MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006005431     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/136698701456013     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Allais, M. (1953) Fondements d’une Theorie Positive des Choix Comportant un Risque et Critique des Postulats et Axioms de L’Ecole Americane, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
2. Boman, M. (1999) Norms in artificial decision making, Artificial Intelligence and Law 7, 17-35
3. Boman, M. and Ekenberg, L. (1995) Decision making agents with relatively unbounded rationality, in E. Nawarecki (ed.), Proceedings of DIMAS’95, pp. I/28-I/35, Krakow: AGH
4. Choquet, G. (1953/54) Theory of capacities, Annales de l’Institut Fourier 5, 131-295.
5. Danielson, M. (1997) Computational decision analysis, Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences: Royal Institute of Technology.
6. Danielson, M. and Ekenberg, L. (1998) A framework for analysing decisions under risk, European Journal of Operational Research 104, 474-484.
7. Dempster, A.P. (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38, 325-339.
8. Doyle, J., Thomason, R., Friedman, N., Monderev, D., Tennenholtz, M. and Wellman, M. (1997) Qualitative preferences in deliberation and practical reasoning, Working notes, Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
9. Ekenberg, L., Danielson, M. and Boman, M. (1996) From local assessments to global rationality, International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 5, 315-331.
10. Ekenberg, L., Danielson, M. and Boman, M. (1997) Imposing security constraints on agent-based decision support, Decision Support Systems 20, 3-15.
11. Ekenberg, L. and Thorbiornson, J. (1997) Modelling indeterminacy in decision situations, IIASA report series IR-97-044.
12. Ellsberg, D. (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms, Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643-669.
13. Fischhoff, B., Goitein, B. and Shapira, Z. (1983) Subjective expected utility: a model of decision-making, in R.W. Scholz (ed.), Decision Making under Uncertainty, pp. 183-207, Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.
14. Fishburn, P. (1981) Subjective expected utility: a review of normative theories, Theory and Decision 13, 139-199.
15. Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R. (1990) Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Public Policy, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
16. Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R. (1992) Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science, in S. Krimsky and D. Golding (eds), Social Theories of Risk, pp. 251-273, Westport, CT: Praeger.
17. Gmytrasiewicz, P.J. and Durfee, E. H. (1993) Elements of a utilitarian theory of knowledge and action, Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 396-402.
18. Good, I.J. (1962) Subjective probability as the measure of a non-measurable set, in P. Suppes, Nagel and A. Tarski (eds), Logic, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science, pp. 319-329, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Gardenfors, P. and Sahlin, N.-E. (1982) Unreliable probabilities, risk taking, and decision making, Synthese 53, 361-386.
20. Herstein, I.N. and Milnor, J. (1953) An axiomatic approach to measurable utility, Econometrica 21, 291-297.
21. Huber, P.J. (1973) The case of Choquet capacities in statistics, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute 45, 181-188.
22. Huber, P.J. and Strassen, V. (1973) Minimax tests and the Neyman-Pearsons lemma for capacities, Annals of Statistics 1, 251-263.
23. ISO (1996) Managing Catastrophe Risk, ISO Insurance Issues Series 1996, Insurance Services Office, Inc.
24. Jeffrey, R. (1983) The Logic of Decision, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Kahneman, D. and Lovallo, D. (1993) Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking, Management Science 39, 17-31.
26. Kunreuther, H., Ginsberg, R., Miller, L., Slovic, P., Borkan, B. and Katz, N. (1978) Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons, Chichester: Wiley.
27. Kyburg, H.E. (1961) Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
28. Lehmann, E.L. (1959) Testing Statistical Hypothesis, Chichester: Wiley.
29. Levi, I. (1974) On indeterminate probabilities, Journal of Philosophy 71, 391-418.
30. Levi, I. (1992) Feasibility, in C. Bicchieri and M. Della Chiara (eds), Knowledge, Belief, And Strategic Interaction, pp. 1-20, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Linnerooth-Bayer, J. (1996) Does society mismanage risk?, in R.J. Zeckhauser, R.L. Keeney, and J.K. Sebenius (eds), Wise Choices: Decisions, Games, and Negotiations, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
32. Loomes, G. and Sudgen, R. (1982) Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty, The Economic Journal 92, 805-824.
33. Luce, R. D. and Krantz, D. (1971) Conditional expected utility, Econometrica 39, 253-271.
34. Malmnas, P. E. (1990) Axiomatic justification of the utility principle, HSFR 677/87.
35. Malmnas, P.E. (1994) Axiomatic justification of the utility principle, Synthese 99, 233-249
36. Malmnas, P.E. (1996) Evaluations, preferences, choice rules, Research Report, Department of Philosophy, Stockholm University.
37. Morgan, M.G. and Henrion, M. (1990) Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Nilsson, N. (1986) Probabilistic logic, Artificial Intelligence 28, 71-87.
39. Oddie, G. and Milne, P. (1990) Act and value, Theoria, LVII, 42-76.
40. Quiggin, J. (1982) A theory of anticipated utility, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 323-343.
41. Ramsey, F. P. (1978) Truth and probability, in D.H. Mellor (ed.) Foundations: Essays in Philosophy, Logics, Mathematics and Economics, pp. 58-100, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
42. Rowe, W.D. (1994) Understanding uncertainty, Risk Analysis 14, 743-750.
43. Russell, S.J. and Norvig, P. (1995) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44. Savage, L. (1972) The Foundations of Statistics, 2nd edn, London: Dover.
45. Schoemaker, P. (1982) The expected utility model: its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations, Journal of Economic Literature 20, 529-563.
46. Shafer, G. (1976) A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47. Shapira, Z. (1995) Risk Taking: A Managerial Perspective, New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
48. Smith, C.A.B. (1961) Consistency in statistical inference and decision, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 23, 1-25.
49. Stirling, W. (1994) Multi agent coordinated decision-making using epistemic utility theory, in ?. Castelfranchi and C.E. Werner (eds), Artificial Social Systems, Lecture Notes in AI 830, pp. 164-183, New York: Springer-Verlag.
50. Suppes, P. (1956) The role of subjective probability and utility maximization, Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1954-55, pp. 113-134.
51. von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd edn, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. Wynne, B. (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventative paradigm, Global Environmental Change 2, 11-127.