Non-toxicity of some antifungal yeasts (pichia guilliermondii, Rhodotorula glutinis and Candida oleophila) in laboratory animals

Annals of Microbiology

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 125-131

  Arras, G ^a   Nicolussi, P ^b   Ligios, C ^b  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO ZOOPROFILATTICO SPERIMENTALE DELLA SARDEGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biological control; Postharvest diseases; Toxicology; Yeasts

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005891249     PISSN: 15904261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arras G. (1993). Inhibition of postharvest fungal pathogens by Bacillus subtilis strains isolated from citrus fruit. Advances in Horticultural Science, 7(3):123-127.
2. Arras G., Arru S. (1997a). Biological control of postharvest citrus diseases by antagonist yeasts. In: Proc. of Workshop, Bologna 9-11 October, pp. 93-98.
3. Arras G., Arru A. (1997b). Mechanism of action of some microbial antagonists against fungal pathogens. Ann. Microbiol. Enzimol., 47-97-120.
4. Arras G., Arru A. (1999). Use of yeasts as biological control agents to prevent postharvest citrus alterations in packinghouse trials. In: Proc. 51° Int. Symp. Crop Protection, 4 May, Gent (Belgium).
5. Arras G., Demontis S., Sussarellu L. (1996a). Characterization of yeasts (Pichia guilliermonelii and Rhodotorula glutinis) antagonistic to Penicillium digitatiim. Ann. Microbiol. Enzimol., 46-285-298.
6. Arras G., Ghibellini A., Quadu F., Demontis S., Sussarellu L. (1996b). Attività inibitrice di lieviti isolati da frutti di agrumi nei confronti di Penicillium digitatum. Italus Hortus, 3:27-31.
7. Arras G., Dessi' R., Sanna P., Arru S. (1997). Inhibitory activity of yeasts isolated from fig fruits against Penicillim digitatum. In: Proc. Int. Symp. on Effects of Pre-and Postharvest Factors on Storage Fruit, Warsaw, 3-7 August, Acta Hort., 485-37-46.
8. Arras G., De Cicco V., Arru S., Lima G. (1998a). Biocontrol by yeasts of blue mould of citrus fruits and the mode of action of an isolate of Pichia guilliermondii. J. Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 73-413-418.
9. Arras G., Pinna G., Arru S., Farris G. A. (1998b). Biodiversità tra lieviti antagonisti in relazione all'attività inibente nei confronti di Penicillium digitatum. In: Atti IV Congresso Nazionale Biodiversità, Alghero 8-11 settembre.
10. Castoria R., De Curtis F., Lima G., De Cicco V. (1997). ß-l, 3-glucanase activity of two saprophytic yeasts and possible mode of action involved as biocontrol agents against postharvest diseases. Postharvest Biol. and Technol., 12-293-300.
11. Commission of European Communities (1993). Recommendations for euthanasia of experimental animals. Final Report.
12. Dave B., Sales M., Walia M. (1990). Resistance of different strains of Penicillium digitatum to imazalil treatment in California citrus packinghouses. In: Proc. Florida State Hort. Soc., 102-173-179.
13. Decreto Legislativo 27 gennaio 1992 n. 116. Attuazione della direttiva CEE 86/609/CEE in materia di protezione degli animali utilizzati ai fini scientifici. Supp. G. U. S. G. n. del 18/2/1992.
14. Droby S., Chalutz E., Wilson C. L., Wisniewski M. E. (1989). Characterization of the biocontrol activity of Debaryomyces hansenii in the control of Penicillium digitatum of grape fruit. Can. J. Microbiol., 35-794-800.
15. El Ghaouth A. (1997). Biologically-based alternatives to synthetic fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases. J. Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 19-160-162.
16. Gorini F. (1990). Tecniche post-raccolta nei trattamenti di conservazione della frutta. Rivista di Frutticoltura, 12-47-54.
17. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resource. Commission of Life Science (1995). Guide for the care and use of Laboratory animals, National Research Council, USA.
18. Jeffries P., Jeger M. J. (1990). The biological control of postharvest diseases of fruit. Biocontrol news and information, 11-333-336.
19. Lima G., De Curtis F., Arras G., De Cicco V. (1997). Attività interspecifica di lieviti antagonisti di patogeni postraccolta su differenti ortofrutticoli. Italus Hortus, 4(3):105-108.
20. Lima G., De Curtis F., Castoria R., De. Cicco V. (1998). Activity of the yeasts Cryptococcus laurentii and Rhodotonila glutinis against postharvest rots on different fruits. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 8-257-267.
21. st edn., La Goliardica Pavese.
22. Wisniewski M. E., Biles C., Droby S., McLaughlin R., Wilson C., Chalutz E. (1991). Mode of action of the postharvest biocontrol yeast, Pichia gitilliermondii. I. Characterization of attachment to Bolrytis cinerea. Physiol. Molecular Plant Pathol, 39-245-258.