Ethics in program evaluation

International Journal of Social Welfare

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 99-109

  Stake, R ^a,c   Mabry, L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c 190 CRC ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Codes of ethics; Ethics; Evaluation; Propriety standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005829443     PISSN: 13696866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.1998.tb00209.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abma T (1996). Responsief evalueren [Responsive evaluation]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Eburon.
2. Campbell D (1975). Assessing the impact of planned social change. In: Lyons G, ed. Social research and public policies. Hanover, NH, Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College.
3. Chelimsky E (1997). The political environment of evaluation and what it means for the development of the field. In: Chelimsky E, Shadish W, eds. Evaluation for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
4. Cronbach L & associates (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
5. Erickson F (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: Wittrook M, ed. Handbook of research on teaching. London, Macmillan.
6. Fetterman D (1994). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15: 1-15.
7. Gilligan C (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
8. Greene J (1994). Qualitative program evaluation: practice and promise. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Handbook of qualitative research (pp 530-544). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
9. House E (1990). An ethics of qualitative field studies. In: Guba E, ed. The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA, Sage.
10. House E (1991). Evaluation and social justice: where are we? In: McLaughlin M, Philips D, eds. Evaluation and social justice: At quarter century, 19th yearbook of the national society of the study of evaluation (pp 233-247). Chicago, III, University of Chicago Press.
11. House E (1993). Professional evaluation: Social impact and political consequences. Newbury Park, CA, Sage.
12. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
13. Kitchener K (1984). Intuition, critical evaluation and ethical principles: the foundation for ethical decisions in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 12 (3): 43-56.
14. Lincoln Y, Guba, E (1989). Ethics: The failure of positivist science. Review of Higher Education, 12 (3): 221-240.
15. Little J (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 15 (2): 129-151.
16. Mabry L (1995). Advocacy in evaluation: inescapable or intolerable? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Vancouver.
17. MacDonald B (1977). A political classification of evaluation studies. In: Hamilton D, ed. Beyond the numbers game. (pp 224-227). London, Macmillan.
18. National Association of Social Workers (1996). Code of ethics. Washington, DC, NASW.
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989, March). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA, Author.
20. Newman D, Brown, R (1996). Applied ethics for program evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
21. Newmann F, Clune W (1992). When school restructuring meets systemic curriculum reform. Brief to policymakers, #3. Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
22. Noddings N (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.
23. Patton M (1986). Utilization-focused evaluation (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
24. Perloff R, Perloff E (1980). Ethics in practice. In their: Values, ethics, and standards in evaluation (New Directions for Program Evaluation No. 7, pp 77-83). San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
25. Rawls J (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
26. Reamer F (1979). Fundamental ethical issues in social work: an essay review. Social Service Review, 229-243, June.
27. Reamer F (1982). Ethical dilemmas in social service. New York, Columbia University Press.
28. Richards H (1985). The evaluation of cultural action. London, Macmillan.
29. Rubin A, Babbie E (1989). Research methods for social work. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth.
30. Schwandt T (1989). Recapturing moral discourse in evaluation. Educational Researcher, 35, 11-16.
31. Schwandt T (1997). Reading the "problem of evaluation" in social inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry (in press)
32. Scriven M (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In: Stake R, ed. Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, No I. Chicago, III, Rand McNally & Co., (pp 39-83).
33. Scriven M (1976). Evaluation bias and its control. In: Glass G, ed. Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Vol. 1. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage, (pp 119-139).
34. Scriven M (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA, Sage.
35. Scriven M (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation. (New directions for program evaluation, No. 58). San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
36. Scriven M (1994). The final synthesis. Evaluation Practice, 15: 367-382.
37. Shadish W, Cook T, Leviton L (1991). Foundations of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
38. Shadish W, Newman D, Scheirer M, Wye, C eds. (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluations, 66, San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
39. Sheafor B, Horejsi C, Horesji G (1994). Techniques and guidelines for social work practice (3rd ed.) Boston, MA, Allyn & Bacon.
40. Sirotnik K, Oakes, J (1990). Evaluation as critical inquiry: school improvement as a case in point. In their: Evaluation and social justice: issues in public education.. New Directions for Program Evaluation No. 45. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass. (pp 37-59).
41. Spiro R, Vispoel W, Schmitz J, Samarapungavan A, Boerger A (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. In: Britton B ed. Executive control process Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, (pp 177-199).
42. Stake R (1975). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation (Paper #5 in Occasional Paper Series). Kalamazoo, MI, College of Education, Western Michigan University.
43. Stake R (1976). Evaluating educational programmes: the need and the response. Paris, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
44. Stake R, Migotsky C, Davis R, Cisneros E, DePaul G, Dunbar C, Farmer R, Feltovich J, Johnson E, Williams B, Zurita M, Chaves I (in press). The evolving syntheses of program value. Evaluation Practice.
45. Stufflebeam D (1994). Empowerment evaluation, objectivist evaluation and evaluation standards: where the future of evaluation should not go and where it needs to go. Evaluation Practice, 15 (3): 321-338.
46. Worthen B, Sanders J and Fitzpatrick J (1997). Program evaluation (2nd edn.). New York, Longman.