Toward legitimizing ecosystem management on the public domain

Ecological Applications

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 727-730

  Keiter, Robert B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005700954     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2269473     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Behan, R. W. 1967. The succotash syndrome, or multiple use: a heartfelt approach to forest land management. Natural Resources Journal 7:473-484.
2. Blumm, M. C. 1994. Public choice theory and the public lands: why "multiple use" failed. Harvard Environmental Law Review 18:405-432.
3. Coggins, G. C. 1981. Of succotash syndromes and vacuous platitudes: the meaning of "multiple use, sustained yield" for public land management. University of Colorado Law Review 53:229-280.
4. Congressional Research Service. 1994a. Ecosystem management: status and potential. S. Prt. 103-98. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
5. _. 1994b. Ecosystem management: federal agency activities. 94-339 ENR. Washington, D.C., USA.
6. Dana, S., and S. Fairfax. 1980. Forest and range policy: its development in the United States. Second edition. McGraw Hill, New York, New York, USA.
7. Eastside Ecosystem Management Project. 1994. Charter: Interior Columbia River Basin Ecosystem Management Framework and Scientific Assessment and Eastside Oregon and Washington Environmental Impact Statement. Walla Walla, Washington, USA.
8. Fitzsimmons, A. K. 1994. Federal ecosystem management: a "train wreck" in the making. Cato Institute Policy Analysis, Washington, D.C. 217:1-33.
9. Gordon, J. C. 1994. From vision to policy: a role for foresters. Journal of Forestry 92:16-19.
10. Grumbine, R. E. 1994. What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology 8:27-38.
11. Huffman, J. L. 1978. A history of forest policy in the United States. Environmental Law 8:239-280.
12. Keiter, R. B. 1994. Beyond the boundary line: constructing a law of ecosystem management. University of Colorado Law Review 65:293-333.
13. _. 1989. Taking account of the ecosystem on the public domain: law and ecology in the greater Yellowstone region. University of Colorado Law Review 60:923-1007.
14. Leshy, J. 1984. Sharing federal multiple-use lands. In S. Brubaker, editor. Rethinking the federal lands. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
15. Scanna, K. A. 1995. The National Biological Survey: a step along the path to ecosystem conservation. New York University Environmental Law Journal 4:135-163.
16. Sierra Summit Steering Committee. 1992. The Sierra Nevada: Report of the Sierra Summit Steering Committee. Resources Agency of California, Sacramento, California, USA.
17. U.S. House of Representatives. 1994a. Ecosystem Management: sustaining the nation's natural resources trust. Majority Staff Report, Committee on Natural Resources, Committee Print Number 6. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
18. _.1994b. The changing needs of the west. Oversight Hearing, Committee on Natural Resources, Serial Number 103-80. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.