Hemispheric asymmetry for word naming: Effects of frequency and regularity of pronunciation

Laterality

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 343-371

  Scott, Gretchen B ^a   Hellige, Joseph B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005680852     PISSN: 1357650X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713754310     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bernstein, S., & Carr, T. (1996). Dual-route theories of pronouncing printed words: What can be learned from concurrent task performance? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 86-116.
2. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human performance and perception, 19, 1162-1182.
3. Besner, D. (1996). Basic processes in reading: Multiple routines in localist and connectionist models. In P.A. McMullen & R.M. Klein (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bruck, M., Herbert, M., & Seidenberg, M. (1984). Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 114-133.
5. Bryden, M. (1986). On the possible dangers of using horizontal word displays in visual field studies. Brain and Cognition, 5, 362-368.
6. Chiarello, C. (1985). Hemisphere dynamics in lexical access. Automatic and controlled priming. Brain and Language, 26, 146-172.
7. Chiarello, C. (1988). Lateralization of lexical processes in the normal brain: A review of visual half-field research. In H.A. Whitaker (Ed.), Contemporary reviews in neuropsychology (pp.36-76). New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Chiarello, C. (1991). Interpretation of word meanings in the cerebral hemisphere: One is not enough. In P.J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 251-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
9. Chiarello, C., Burgess, C., Richards, L., & Pollock, A. (1990). Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres. Some words do, some words don't... sometimes, some places. Brain and Language, 38 75-104.
10. Chiarello, C., & Nuding, S. (1987). Visual field effects for processing content and function words. Neuropsychologia, 25, 539-548.
11. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of Information processing (pp.151-216). New York: Academic Press.
12. Corballis, M. (1986). Fresh fields and postures new: A discussion paper. Brain and Cognition, 5, 540-252.
13. Hellige, J.B. (1986). Visual laterality and the acuity gradient: Potential artifacts and control procedures Brain and Cognition, 5, 369-376.
14. Hellige, J.B. (1993). Hemispheric asymmetry: What's right and what's left. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
15. Hellige, J.B., Block, M.I., Cowin, E.L., Eng, T.L., Eviatar, Z., & Sergent, V. (1994). Individual variation in hemispheric asymmetry: Multitask study of effects related to handedness and sex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 235-256.
16. Hellige, J.B., & Cowin, E.L. (1996). Effects of stimulus arrangement on hemispheric differences and interhemispheric interaction for processing letter trigrams. Neuropsychology, 10, 247-253.
17. Hellige, J.B., Cowin, E.L., & Eng, T. (1995). Recognition of CVC syllables from LVF, RVF and central locations: Hemispheric differences and interhemispheric interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 258-266.
18. Hellige, J.B., Taylor, A., & Eng, T. (1989). Interhemispheric interaction when both hemispheres have access to the same stimulus information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 711-722.
19. Hines, D. (1977). Differences in tachistoscopic recognition between abstract and concrete words as a function of visual half-field and frequency. Cortex, 13, 66-73.
20. Howell, J.R., & Bryden, M.P. (1987). The effects of word orientation and imageability on visual half-field presentations with a lexical decision task. Neuropsychologia, 25, 527-538.
21. Jared, D., & Seidenberg, S. (1990). Naming multisyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 92-105.
22. Kirsner, K., & Schwartz, S. (1986). Words and Hemifields: Do the hemispheres enjoy equal opportunity? Brain and Cognition, 5, 354-361.
23. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
24. Levy, J., Heller, W., Banich, M., & Burton, L. (1983). Are variations among right-handed individuals in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 329-359.
25. Luh, K.E., & Levy, J. (1995). Interhemispheric cooperation: Left is left and right is right, but sometimes the twain shall meet. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1243-1258.
26. Mohr, B., Pulvermuller, F., & Zaidel, E. (1995). Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychologia, 32, 105-124.
27. Morrison, C.M., & Ellis, A.W. (1995). The roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory & Cognition, 21, 116-133.
28. Paap, K., & Noel, R. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research, 53, 13-24.
29. Pexman, P., & Lupker, S. (1995). Effects of memory load in a word-naming task: Five failures to replicate. Memory & Cognition, 5, 581-595.
30. Seidenberg, M. (1991). Dyslexia in a computational model of word recognition in reading. In P. Gough, R. Treiman & L. Ehri (Eds.), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Seidenberg, M. (1997). Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science, 275, 1599-1603.
32. Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
33. Seidenberg, M., Waters, G., Barnes, M., & Tanenhaus, M. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
34. Sergent, J., & Hellige, J. (1986). Role of task factors in visual field asymmetries. Brain and Cognition, 5, 200-222.
35. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J.L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608-631.
36. Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F., & Stone, G.O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
37. Waters, G., & Seidenberg, M. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition, 13, 557-572.
38. Waters, G., Seidenberg, M., & Bruck, M. (1984). Children's and adults' use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Memory & Cognition, 12, 293-305.
39. Weekes, N., Zaidel, D., & Zaidel, E. (1995). Effects of sex and sex role attributions on the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Neuropsychology, 9, 62-67.
40. Young, A., & Ellis, A. (1985). Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields. Brain and Language, 24, 326-358.
41. Zaidel, E. (1983). Disconnection syndrome as a model for laterality effects in the normal brain. In J. Hellige (Ed.), Cerebral hemisphere asymmetry: Method, theory, and application (pp.95-151). New York: Praeger.