Innovative treatments: Ethical requirements for evaluation

Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 378-381

  Gillett, G R ^a  

^a DUNEDIN HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Audit; Clinical trial; Ethics; Informed consent; Innovative surgery

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005632225     PISSN: 09675868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-5868(98)90265-X     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Parkinson D. A surgical approach to the cavernous portion of the carotid artery: anatomical studies and a case report. J Neurosurg 1965; 23:474-483.
2. Dolenc VV. Anatomy and Surgery of the Cavernous Sinus. New York: Springer Verlag, 1987.
3. Al-Mefty O, Smith RR. Surgery of tumors invading the cavernous sinus. Surg Neurol 1988; 30: 370-381.
4. Fukushima T, Day JD. Surgical management of tumors involving the cavernous sinus. In: Schmidek and Sweet (eds). Operative Neurosurgical Techniques, Vol 1. New York: WB Saunders, 1995.
5. Knosp E, Perneczky A, Koos WT, Fries G, Matula C. Meningiomas of the space of the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery 1996; 38: 434-444.
6. Uttley D. Skull base surgery. Br J Neurosurg 1995; 9: 437-439.
7. Jennett B. High Technology Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986: 244.
8. Jennett B. High Technology Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986: 95.
9. Herkowitz HN. A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy. Spine 1988; 13: 774-780.
10. Sim FH, Suien HJ, Bickel WH, Janes JM. Swan neck deformity following extensive cervical laminectomy. J Bone Joint Surg 1974; 56A: 564-580.
11. Crandall P, Gregorius F. Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 1977; 2: 139-146.
12. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K. Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparitive study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 1992; 17: 1281-1284.
13. Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y. Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995; 77: 956-961.
14. Naito M, Ogata K, Kurose S, Oyama M. Canal expansive laminoplasty in 83 patients with cervical myelopathy. Intl Orthopaed 1994; 18: 347-351.
15. Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, Hirabayashi K. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1994; 19: 507-510.
16. Baba H, Chen Q, Uchida K, Imura S, Morikawa S, Tomita K. Laminoplasty with foraminotomy for coexisting cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy. Spine 1996; 21: 196-202.
17. Frank E, Keenen TL. A technique for cervical laminoplasty using mini plates. Br J Neurosurg 1994; 8: 197-199.
18. Hamburger C. T-laminoplasty: a surgical approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Technical note. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995; 132: 131-133.
19. Epstein JA, Epstein NE. The surgical management of cervical spinal stenosis, spondylosis and myeloradiculopathy by means of the posterior approach. In: Cervical Spine Research Society (ed). The Cervical Spine. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1989: 625-669.
20. JOA Japanese Orthopedic Association. Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1994; 68: 490-503.
21. Kadoya S. Grading and scoring system for neurological function in degenerative cervical spine disease - Neurosurgical Cervical Spine Scale. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1992; 32: 40-41.
22. Hippocrates. Hippocratic Writings (Lloyd ed.) London: Penguin, 1978: 71.
23. Hippocrates. Hippocratic writings (Lloyd ed.) London: Penguin, 1978: 77.
24. McNeill P. The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1993.