Towards methodological rigour in the study of the family: Problems and prospects

Psychology and Developing Societies

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 71-91

  D'Cruz, Premilla ^a   Bharat, Shalini ^a  

^a TATA INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005560629     PISSN: 09713336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/097133360101300104     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allen, K. (2000). A conscious and inclusive family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(1): 4-17.
2. Ambert, A., Adler, P.A., Adler, P., & Detzner, D.F. (1995). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(4): 879-893.
3. Bharat, S. (1996a). Family measurement in India. In S. Bharat (Ed.), Family measurement in India. New Delhi: Sage.
4. Bharat, S. (1996b). Indian instruments for assessment in family and marriage: A compilation of annotated abstracts. In S. Bharat (Ed.), Family Measurements in India. New Delhi: Sage.
5. Bharat, S., & Desai, M. (1995). Indian bibliographies on the family. Mumbai: TISS.
6. Brown, L.H., & Kidwell, J.S. (1982). Methodology in family studies: The other side of caring. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44(4): 833-839.
7. Burgess, E.W. (1926). The family as a unity of interacting personalities. Family, (1): 3-9.
8. Burr, W.R., & Leigh, G.K. (1983). Famology: A new discipline. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(3): 467-480.
9. Christensen, H.T. (1964). Development of the family field of study. In H.T. Christensen (Ed.), Handbook of marriage and the family. Chicago: Rand McNally.
10. Cromwell, R.E., & Peterson, G.W. (1981). Multisystem-multimethod assessment: A framework. In E.E. Filsinger, & R.A. Lewis (Eds.), Assessing marriage. California: Sage.
11. Desai, M. (1994a). Family and interventions: Curriculum planning. In M. Desai (Ed.), Family and interventions - A course compendium. Mumbai: TISS.
12. Desai, M. (1994b). Conceptual framework for analysis of family case studies. In M. Desai (Ed.), Family and interventions-Some case studies. Mumbai: TISS.
13. Fisher, L., Kokes, R.F., Ransom, D.C., Phillips, S.L., & Rudd, P. (1985). Alternative strategies for creating "relational" family data. Family Process, 24(2): 213-224.
14. Gore, M.S. (1965). The traditional Indian family. In M.F. Nimkoff (Ed.), Comparative family systems. Boston: Houghton and Mifflin.
15. Hartman, A., & Laird, J. (1983). Family-centred social work practice. New York: Free Press.
16. Henwood, K.L., & Pidgeon, N.F. (1993). Qualitative research and psychological theorising. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Social research: Philosophy, politics and practice. London: Sage.
17. Kashyap, L. (1996). Measurement issues in family-centred social work. In S. Bharat (Ed.), Family measurement in India. Sage: New Delhi.
18. LaRossa, R. (1984). Family case studies. New York: Free Press.
19. LaRossa, R., & Wolf, J.M. (1985). On qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47(3): 531-541.
20. Larsen, A., & Olson, D.M. (1990). Capturing the complexity of family systems: Integrating family theory, family scores and family analysis. In T.W. Draper, & A.C. Marcos (Eds.), Family variables: Conceptualisation, measurement and use. California: Sage.
21. Larzelere, R.E., & Klein, D.M. (1987). Methodology. In M.B. Sussman, & S.K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family. New York: Plenum.
22. Mane, P. (1996). Assessment in the area of marriage: The social work approach in India. In S. Bharat (Ed.), Family measurement in India. Sage: New Delhi.
23. Marcos, A.C., & Draper, T.W. (1990). Capturing family variables. In T.W. Draper, & A.C. Marcos (Eds.), Family variables: Conceptualisation, measurement and use. California: Sage.
24. Miller, B.C., Rollins, B.C., & Thomas, D.L. (1982). On methods of studying marriages and families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44(4): 851-873.
25. Nye, F.I., & Berardo, F.M. (1966). Emerging conceptual frameworks in family analysis. New York: MacMillan.
26. Olson, D.H. (1981). Family typologies: Bridging family research and family therapy. In E.E. Filsinger, & R.A. Lewis (Eds.), Assessing marriage. California: Sage.
27. Ransom, D.C., Fisher, L., Phillips, S., Kokes, R.F., & Weiss, R. (1990). The logic of measurement in family research. In T.W. Draper & A.C. Marcos (Eds.), Family variables: Conceptualisation, measurement and use. California: Sage.
28. SaFIlios-Rothschild, C. (1969). Family sociology or wives' family sociology: A cross-cultural examination of decision-making. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31(3): 290-301.
29. Schumm, W.R. (1990). Evolution of the family field: Measurement principles and techniques. In J. Touliatos, B.F. Perlmutter, & M.A. Straus (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques. California: Sage.
30. Thomas, D.L., & Wilcox, J.E. (1987). The rise of family theory. In M.B. Sussman, & S.K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family. New York: Plenum.
31. Thompson, L. (1992). Feminist methodology for family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(1): 3-18.
32. Touliatos, J., Perlmutter, B.F., & Straus, M.A. (1990). Handbook of family measurement techniques. California: Sage.
33. Zeller, R.A., & Carmines, E.G. (1980). Measurement in the social sciences: The link between theory and data. New York: Cambridge University Press.