Biochemical genetic differentiation in some roe deer populations of tuscany, Central Italy

Italian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 239-244

  Lorenzini, Rita ^a   Burrini, Lucia ^b   Stella, Roberto Mazzoni Della ^c  

^a ISTITUTO ZOOPROFILATTICO SPERIMENTALE DELL ABRUZZO E DEL MOLISE G CAPORALE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^c Amministrazione Provinciale di Siena   (Italy)

Author keywords

Allozyme diversity; Capreolus capreolus; Electrophoresis; Population history; Restocking

Indexed keywords

CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS; CERVIDAE;

EID: 0005473134     PISSN: 11250003     EISSN: 17485851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11250009709356203     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Edwards, A. W. F., 1967. Phylogenetic analysis:models and estimation procedures. Evolution, 21:550–570.
2. Farris, J. S., 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am. Nat., 106:645–668.
3. Fitch, W. M., and Margoliash, E., 1967. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science, 155:279–284.
4. Goulson, D., 1994. Allozyme variation in the butterfly, Maniola jur-tina (Lepidoptera:Satyrinae):evidence for selection. Heredity, 71:386–393.
5. Hartl, G. B., and Reimoser, F., 1988. Biochemical variation in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.):are r-strategists among deer generally less variable than k-strategists?. Heredity, 60:221–227.
6. Hartl, G. B., Reimoser, F., Willing, R., and Köller, J., 1991. Genetic variability and differentiation in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) of central Europe. Genet. Sel. Evol., 23:281–199.
7. Hartl, G. B., Markov, G., Rubin, A., Findo, S., Lang, G., and Willing, R., 1993. Allozyme diversity within and among populations of three ungulate species (Cervus elaphus, Capreolus capreolus, Sus scrofa) of southeastern and central Europe. Z. Säugetierk., 58:352–361.
8. Hewison, A. J. M., 1995. Isozyme variation in roe deer in relation to their population history in Britain. J. Zool., Lond., 235:299–288.
9. Kurt, F., 1991. Das Reh in der Kulturlandschaft - Sozial verhalten und Ökologie eines Anpassers, Hamburg-Berlin:P. Parey.
10. Lehmann, E. von, and Sägesser, H., 1986. “ Capreolus capreolus Linnaeus, 1758. ”. In Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas, Edited by:Niethammer, J., and Krapp, F., Vol. 2/II, 233–268. Wiesbaden:Aula-Verlag.
11. Lorenzini, R., Patalano, M., Apollonio, M., and Mazzarone, V., 1993. Genetic variability of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Italy:electrophoretic survey on populations of different origin. Acta theriol., 38 (Suppl. 2):141–151. In:G. B. Hartl & J. Markowski (eds), Ecological genetics in mammals
12. Lorenzini, R., Mattioli, L., Rustioni, M., and Patalano, M., 1996. Allozyme and craniometric variability in the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) from central Italy. Z. Säugetierk., 61:7–24.
13. Lovari, C., Mattioli, L., Mazzarone, V., Siemoni, N., and Pedone, P., 1991. “ Biometric statistics of two populations of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) in Tuscany, Italy. ”. In Ongulés/Ungulates 91, Edited by:Spitz, F., Janeau, G., Gonzalez, G., and Aulagnier, S., 133–136. Toulouse:S.F.E.P.M. - I.R.G.M.
14. Lovari, S., 1993. “ Evoluzione recente delle popolazioni di grandi mammiferi della fauna d'Italia. ”. In Atti Sem. Evol. Biol. “Faune at tuali e faune fossili”, 19, 27–37. Roma:Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.
15. Mattioli, S., 1994. “ Le reintroduzioni di Cervidi in Italia, con par ticolare riferimento all'Appennino. ”. In I Con vegno Paolo Barrasso:La fauna appenninica e la sua conser vazione Edited by:Inglisa, M., 19–25.
16. Mazzoni della Stella, R., 1990. Indagine sulla presenza del capriolo e del daino nella provincia di Siena, 65Amministrazione provinciale di Siena.
17. Nei, M., 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat., 106:283–292.
18. Nei, M., 1977. F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Ann. hum. Genet., 41:225–233.
19. Nei, M., 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89:583–590.
20. Nei, M., 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics, 512New York:Columbia University Press.
21. Nei, M., Muruyama, T., and Chakraborty, R., 1975. The bottleneck effect and the genetic variability in populations. Evolution, 29:1–10.
22. Neuhaus, A. H., and Schaich, K., 1985. Das Rehwild, Hamburg-Berlin:P. Parey.
23. Perco, F., 1987. Ungulati, Udine:C. Lorenzini.
24. Perco, F., and Perco, D., 1979. Il capriolo, Trieste:E. Carso.
25. Prager, E. M., and Wilson, A.C., 1976. Congruency of phylogenies derived from different proteins. A molecular analysis of the phylogenetic position of cracid birds. J. mol. Evol., 9:45–57.
26. Rogers, J. S., 1972. “ Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distan ce. ”. In Studies in genetics, VII, 145–153. University of Texas Publ., 7213.
27. Ryder, O.A., 1986. Species conservation and systematics:the dilem ma of subspecies. TREE, 1:9–10.
28. Slatkin, M., 1985. Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution, 39:53–65.
29. Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, R. R., 1973. Numerical taxonomy, 573San Francisco:W.H. Freeman.
30. Sokolov, V. E., Shurkhal, A. V., Danilkin, A. A., Podogas, A. V., Rakit-skaya, T. A., and Markov, G. G., 1986. A comparative analysis of elec trophoretic spectra of blood and muscle-tissue proteins of European (Capreolus capreolus) and Siberian (Capreolus pygargus Pall.) roe deer. Dokl. Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR (Biol. Sci.), 288:391–393.
31. Swofford, D. L., and Selander, R. B., 1989. BIOSYS-1. A computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in population genetics and biochemical systematics, Champaign, Illinois:Illinois Nat. Hist. Survey. Release 1.7.
32. Takahata, N., and Nei, M., 1984. Fst and Gst statistics in the finite island model. Genetics, 107:501–504.
33. Wehner, J. P., Müller, H. P., and Kierdorf, H., 1991. Untersuchungen zur genetischen Situation ausgewählter rheinischer Rehwild- Populationen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung isolationen- sbedingter Veränderungen. Z. Jagdwiss., 37:40–48.
34. Wells, J. V., and Richmond, M. E., 1995. Populations, metapopulations, and species populations:what are they and who should care?. Wildl. Soc. Bull., 23:458–462.
35. Workman, P. L., and Niswander, J. D., 1970. Population studies on south - western Indian tribes, II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. Am. J. hum. Genet., 22:24–49.
36. Wright, S., 1978. Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol. 4. Variability within and among natural populations, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.