Chiefdoms and family firm regimes: Variations on the same anthropological themes

Family Business Review

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 15-27

  Rogers, Elizabeth D ^a   Carsrud, Alan L ^a   Krueger Jr , Norris F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Entrepreneurial Strategies in Bozeman   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005346396     PISSN: 08944865     EISSN: 17416248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00015.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bell, F.L.S. (1932). A functional interpretation of inheritance and succession in central Polynesia. Oceania, 3, 167-206.
2. Benedict, B. (1968). Family firms and economic development. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 24, 1-19.
3. Chandler, A.D. (1977). The Visible Band: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Crutchfield, J.P.et al.(1986). Chaos. Scientific American, November, 46-57.
5. Danco, L. (1984). Personal communication.
6. Davis, P. (1983.). Realizing the potential of the family business. Organizational Dynamics, 12, 47-56.
7. Dyer, W.G. (1988). Culture and continuity in family firms. Family Business Review, 1(1), 37-50.
8. Earle, T. (1978). Economic and Social Organization of a Complex Chiefdom: the Halelea District, Kauai, Hawaii. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.
9. Firth, R. (1936). We the Tikopia, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
10. Fortes, M. (1958). Introduction. In J. Goody's (ed.) The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gluckman, M. (1954). Succession and civil war among the Bemba: An exercise in anthropological theory. Human Problems in British Central Africa, 16.
12. Goody, J. (1958). The Developmental cycle in Domestic Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Goody, J. (1966). Succession to High Office. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1-56.
14. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
15. Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic institutions as social constructions. Acta Sociologica, 35(1), 3-11.
16. Johnson, G.A. (1988). Organizational structure and scaler stress. In C. Renfrew (Ed.) Theory and Explanation in Archaeology. New York: Academic Press.
17. Kanter, R. (1989). Work and family in the U.S.: a critical review and agenda for research and policy. Family Business Review, 2(1), 77-114.
18. Johnson, A. and Earle, T. (1987). The Evolution of Human Societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
19. Kendall, P.M. (1965). Richard the Third. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Books
20. Kets de Vries, M.F. (1993). The dynamics of family-controlled firms. Organizational Dynamics, 21, 59-71.
21. Krueger, N. (1993). Growing up entrepreneurial? Paper presented to the Academy of Management, Atlanta.
22. Lansberg, I.,et al.(1988). Family business as an emerging field. Family Business Review, 1(1), 1-8.
23. Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: Dutton and Company.
24. Nadel, S.F. (1942). A Black Byzantium: The Kingdom of Nupe in Nigeria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Polanyi, B. (1944). The Great Transformation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
26. Rivers, W.H.R. (1914). Kinship and social organisation. London School of Economics and Political Science Studies, 36. London: Constable.
27. Searles, E. (1988). Predatory Kinship and the Creation of Norman Power, 840-1066. Berkley: University of California Press.
28. Stearns, M.L. (1984). Succession to chiefship in Haida society. In J. Miller and C. M. Eastman (Eds.), The Tsimshian and Their Neighbors of the North Pacific Coast. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
29. Stewart, A. (1993). A prospectus on the anthropology of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 71-91.
30. Stewart, A. (1989). Team Entrepreneurship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
31. Swisher, K. (1994). Dart asks Herbert Haft to prove TV accusations. Washington Post, October 10, 117, WB7.
32. Rogers, E.D. (1990). Succession in American rose-growing firms: A study of process in commercial polities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.
33. Torry, S. (1994). Haft vs. Haft, a one-family legal bonanza. The Washington Post, September 24, 117, p. D1.
34. Yanagisako, S.J. (1979). Domestic groups. Annual Review of Anthropology, 8, 161-205.