Theoretical Studies of the Reactions of the Sulfur-Sulfur Bond. 1. General Heterolytic Mechanisms

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 99, Issue 9, 1977, Pages 2926-2930

  Pappas, Jan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005259357     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: 15205126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja00451a013     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. J. L. Kice, Acc. Chem. Res., 1, 58 (1968).
2. L. Kice, “Sulfur in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry”, Vol. 1, A. Senning, Ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, N.Y. 1971, pp 153-208.
3. E. Ciuffarin and A. Fava, Prog. Phys. Org. Chem., 6, 81 (1968).
4. Yu. M. Torchinskii, “Sulfhydryl and Disulfide Groups of Proteins”, Studies in Soviet Science, Consultants Bureau, N. Y., 1974.
5. P. C. Jocelyn, “Biochemistry of the SH Group”, Academic Press, New York, N.Y., 1972, pp 116-136.
6. J. O. Edwards and R. G. Pearson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 84, 16 (1962).
7. J. Almlöf, USIP-Report 72-09, University of Stockholm, 1972.
8. B. Roos and P. Siegbahn, Theor. Chim. Acta, 17, 199, 209 (1970).
9. S. Huizinaga, J. Chem. Phys., 42, 1293 (1967).
10. H. Yamabe, H. Kato, and T. Yonezawa, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 44, 604 (1971).
11. J. A. Pappas, Chem. Phys., 12,397 (1976). Dr. D. B. Boyd has kindly pointed out that he (based on EH calculations and not CNDO as stated in this reference) and the author agree that there seems to be no effect from methyl substitutions on the gross charges on sulfur which can be correlated with the ionization potentials of the disulfide moiety. Dr. Boyd has, however, not correlated changes in the S-R overlap populations with these ionization potentials.
12. J. L. Kice and E. H. Morkved, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86, 2270 (1964);
13. J. L. Kice and G. Guaraldi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 5236 (1966);
14. J. L. Kice, C. G. Vernier, and L. Heasley, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 3557 (1967).
15. C. G. Swain and C. B. Scott, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 75, 141 (1953);
16. C. G. Swain, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 70, 1119 (1948).
17. Although H- and H+ do not simultaneously exist as free ions, H- was included to compare the efficiencies of the concomitant and the nucleophilic reactions as H- is known to cleave R2S2 in aprotic solvents like DMSO. See L. H. Krull and M. Friedmann, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 29, 373 (1969).
18. A. A. Painter and F. E. Hunter, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 40, 387 (1970).
19. H. Kistenmacher, H. Popkie, and E. Clementi, J. Chem. Phys., 61, 799 (1974).
20. A. Gawron, “The Chemistry of Organic Sulfur Compounds”, Vol. 2, N. Karasch and C. Y. Meyers, Ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1966, p 351.
21. G. H. F. Diercksen, W. P. Kraemer, and B. Roos, Theor. Chim. Acta, 36, 249 (1975).
22. C. D. West, J. Phys. Chem., 39, 493 (1935).
23. J. I. Brauman and L. K. Blair, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 92, 5986 (1970);
24. P. Kriemler and S. E. Buttrill, 92, 1123 (1970).
25. R. Juza, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 231, 121 (1937).
26. R. Gaspar, I. Tamassy-Lentei, and V. Kruglyak, J. Chem. Phys., 36, 740 (1962).
27. S. L. Chong, R. A. Myers, and J. L. Franklin, J. Chem. Phys., 56, 2427 (1972).