REPEATING AND REMEMBERING FOREIGN LANGUAGE WORDS: DOES SEEING HELP?

Auditory-Visual Speech Processing 1998, AVSP 1998

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages 121-126

  Davis, Chris ^a   Kim, Jeesun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIO ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PROCESSING; VISUAL LANGUAGES;

'CURRENT; AUDIO-VISUAL; CONDITION; FOREIGN LANGUAGE; LIP READING; NON-NATIVE; NORMAL HEARING; PERFORMANCE; PRESENTATION MODES; VISUAL PRESENTATION;

AUDITION;

EID: 0005034273     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Dodd, B. (1977). The role of vision in the perception of speech. Perception, 6, 31-40.
2. Reisberg, D, McLean, J., & Goldfield, A. (1987). Easy to hear to understand: A lip-reading advantage with intact auditory stimuli. In B.Dodd and R. Cambell, (Eds.) Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp 97-113.
3. Rahman M.D.S., & Uddin N.H.M.S .(1998). A Pc-Based Audio-Visual Alphabet Learning System. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. 35(1), 37-46.
4. Cairns, P., Shillcock, R., Chater, N., & Levy, J. P. (1995). Bottom-up connectionist modelling of speech. Chapter 15. In Connectionist models of memory and language. J.P Levy, D Bairaktaris, JA. Bullinaria & P. Cairns (Eds.). UCL Press: London.
5. Werker, J. .F. & Logan, J. (1985). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 35-44.
6. Munhall, K. G. & Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. (1998) The moving face during speech communication. In R. Cambell, B. .Dodd, & D. Burnham (Eds.), Hearing by eye, Part 2: The psychology of speechreading and audiovisual speech. London: Taylor & Francis, Psychology Press.
7. Silsbee, P. L & Bovik, A. C. (1996). Computer lipreading for improved accuracy in automatic speech recognition, IEEE, Transactions on speech and audio processing, 4, 337-351.
8. Thompson, L. A. & Ogden, W. C. (1995). Visible speech improves human language understanding: Implications for speech processing system. Artificial Intelligence Review, 9, 347-358.
9. th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (3) (pp. 222 - 5). Stockholm, Sweden.
10. Sanders, D. & Goodrich, S. (1971). The relative contribution of visual and auditory attention. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 154-159.
11. Cohen, M. M., & Massaro, D. W. (1994) Development and Experimentation with Synthetic Visible Speech Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation, 26, 260-265