False principles of welfare reform

Australian Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 189-205

  Goodin, Robert E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005000965     PISSN: 01576321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2001.tb01098.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Arneson, R.J. (1990) 'Is work special? Justice and the distribution of employment', American Political Science Review, 84 (4), 1127-47.
2. Atkinson, A.B. (1990) 'Income maintenance for the unemployed in Britain and the response to high unemployment', Ethics 100 (3), 569-85.
3. Atkinson, A.B. (1996) 'The case for a participation income', Political Quarterly, 67 (1), 67-70.
4. Blair, T. (1996) New Britain: My Vision of a Young Country, London, Fourth Estate.
5. Blaug, M. (1963) 'The myth of the old Poor Law and the making of the new', Journal of Economic History, 23 (2), 151-84.
6. Blomfield, L. et al. (1834) Report from His Majesty's Commission for Enquiring into the Administration and Practical Operation of the Poor Law, London, HMSO, 1834. Reprinted in part as S.G. & E.O.A. Checkland (eds) The Poor Law Report of 1834, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1974.
7. Blomfield, L. et al. (1834) Report from His Majesty's Commission for Enquiring into the Administration and Practical Operation of the Poor Law, London, HMSO, 1834. Reprinted in part as S.G. & E.O.A. Checkland (eds) The Poor Law Report of 1834, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1974.
8. Burtless, G.T., Weaver, K. & Wiener, J.M. (1997) 'The future of the social safety net'. In R.D. Reischauer (ed.) Setting National Priorities: Budget Choices for the Next Century, Washington, D. C., Brookings Institution.
9. Clinton, W.J. (1996a) 'Presidential news conference: Clinton says welfare bill is a 'real step forward', Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 54 (31), 2216-18.
10. Clinton, W.J. (1996b) Statement by President William J. Clinton upon signing H.R. 3734. US Code, Congressional & Administrative News, 104th Congress -Second Session, 1996, 5, 2891-93.
11. Cohen, S. (1980) Folk Devils and Moral Panics, Oxford, Martin Robertson.
12. Davis, G., Sullivan, B. & Yeatman, A. eds (1997) The New Contractualism? South Melbourne, Macmillan Education Australia.
13. Dwyer, P. (1998) 'Conditional citizens? Welfare rights and responsibilities in the late 1990s', Critical Social Policy, 18 (4), 493-518.
14. Elster, J. (1988) 'Is there (or should there be) a right to work?' In A. Gutmann (ed.) Democracy and the Welfare State, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
15. Elster, J. (1989) 'Self-realization in work and politics: The Marxist conception of the good life'. In J. Elster & K.O. Moene (eds) Alternatives to Capitalism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
16. Elster, J. (2000) Ulysses Unbound, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
17. Etzioni, A., Glendon, M.A., Galston, W. et al. (1991) 'The responsive communitarian platform: Rights and responsibilities '. Reprinted in A. Etzioni, The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda, London, Fontana, 1995.
18. Etzioni, A., Glendon, M.A., Galston, W. et al. (1991) 'The responsive communitarian platform: Rights and responsibilities '. Reprinted in A. Etzioni, The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda, London, Fontana, 1995.
19. Galston, W.A. (2000) 'What about reciprocity?' Boston Review, 25 (5), 9.
20. Gingrich, N., Armey, D. and the House Republicans (1994) Contract with America, New York, Times Books, Random House.
21. Goodin, R.E. (1985a) 'Erring on the side of kindness in social welfare policy', Policy Sciences, 18 (3), 141-56.
22. Goodin, R.E. (1985b) Protecting the Vulnerable: A Re-Analysis of Our Social Responsibilities, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
23. Goodin, R E. (1988) Reasons for Welfare, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
24. Goodin, R.E. (1991) 'Permissible paternalism: In defense of the nanny state', The Responsive Community, 1 (Summer), 42-51. Reprinted in A. Etzioni, Rights and the Common Good, New York, St. Martin's Press, 1994; H. La Follette (ed.) Ethics in Practice: An Anthology, Oxford, Blackwell, 1997; A. Etzioni (ed.) The Essential Communitarian Reader, Lanham, Md., Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.
25. Goodin, R.E. (1991) 'Permissible paternalism: In defense of the nanny state', The Responsive Community, 1 (Summer), 42-51. Reprinted in A. Etzioni, Rights and the Common Good, New York, St. Martin's Press, 1994; H. La Follette (ed.) Ethics in Practice: An Anthology, Oxford, Blackwell, 1997; A. Etzioni (ed.) The Essential Communitarian Reader, Lanham, Md., Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.
26. Goodin, R.E. (1991) 'Permissible paternalism: In defense of the nanny state', The Responsive Community, 1 (Summer), 42-51. Reprinted in A. Etzioni, Rights and the Common Good, New York, St. Martin's Press, 1994; H. La Follette (ed.) Ethics in Practice: An Anthology, Oxford, Blackwell, 1997; A. Etzioni (ed.) The Essential Communitarian Reader, Lanham, Md., Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.
27. Goodin, R.E. (1991) 'Permissible paternalism: In defense of the nanny state', The Responsive Community, 1 (Summer), 42-51. Reprinted in A. Etzioni, Rights and the Common Good, New York, St. Martin's Press, 1994; H. La Follette (ed.) Ethics in Practice: An Anthology, Oxford, Blackwell, 1997; A. Etzioni (ed.) The Essential Communitarian Reader, Lanham, Md., Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.
28. Goodin, R.E. (1998) 'Social welfare as a collective social responsibility'. In D. Schmidtz & R.E. Goodin, Social Welfare and Individual Responsibility, New York, Cambridge University Press.
29. Goodin, R.E., Headey, B., Muffels, R. & Dirven, H-J. (1999) The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
30. Grubb, D. (2000) 'Eligibility criteria for unemployment benefits', OECD Economic Studies, 31, 147-84.
31. Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (1996) Democracy and Disagreement, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
32. Hughes, G. & Little, A. (1999) 'The contradictions of New Labour's communitarianism', Imprints, 4, 37-62.
33. Hume, D. (1760). 'Of the original contract', Pt 2, ch. 12 of Essays, Literary, Moral and Political, London, A. Millar.
34. Janoski, Thomas. (1994) 'Direct state intervention in the labor market: The explanation of active labor market policy from 1950 to 1988 in social democratic, conservative and liberal regimes'. In T. Janoski & A.M. Hicks (eds) The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State, New York, Cambridge University Press.
35. Keating, P.J. (1994) Working Nation: Policies and Programs, Canberra, AGSM.
36. Kildal, N. (1999) 'Justification of workfare: The Norwegian case', Critical Social Policy, 19 (3), 353-70.
37. King, D. (1995) Actively Seeking Work? The Politics of Unemployment and Welfare Policy in the United States and Great Britain, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
38. King, D. (1999) In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the USA and Britain, New York, Oxford University Press.
39. Lipsky, M. (1984) 'Bureaucratic disentitlement in social welfare programs', Social Service Review, 58 (1), 3-27.
40. Locke, J. (1993 [1697]) 'Draft of a representation containing a scheme of methods for the employment of the poor'. In D. Wootton (ed.) Political Writings of John Locke, New York, Mentor.
41. McClure, P. et al. (2000) Participation Support for a More Equitable Society, Final Report of the Reference Group on Welfare Reform, Canberra, Department of Family & Community Services.
42. MacGregor, S. (1999) 'Welfare, neo-liberalism and new paternalism: Three ways for social policy in late capitalist societies', Capital & Class, 67 (Spring), 91-118.
43. Martini, A. & Wiseman, M. (1997) 'Explaining the recent decline in welfare caseloads: Is the Council of Economic Advisers right?' Challenge, 40 (6), 6-20; at http:/ /www.urban.org/welfare/cea.htm
44. Mead, L. (1997a) 'Citizenship and social policy: T.H. Marshall and poverty', Social Philosophy & Policy, 14 (2), 197-230.
45. Mead, L. ed. (1997b) The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution.
46. Perri 6. (2000) 'Can the obligations in welfare-to-work schemes be morally justified?' Mimeo, Department of Politics, University of Strathclyde.
47. Rosanvallon, P. (2000) The New Social Question: Rethinking the Welfare State, trans. Barbara Harshav, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
48. Steiner, H. (1978) 'Can a social contract be signed by an invisible hand?' In P. Birnbaum, J. Lively & G. Parry (eds) Democracy, Consensus and Social Contract, London, Sage.
49. Titmuss, R. M. (1958) The social division of welfare: Some reflections on the search for equity'. In R.M. Titmuss, Essays on 'the Welfare State", London, Allen & Unwin.
50. UK Secretary of State for Social Security (1998) A New Contract for Welfare, Cm 3805. London, HMSO.
51. US Council of Economic Advisers (1997) Explaining the decline in welfare receipt, 1993-1996, Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office, at http:// www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/CEA/Welfare/
52. US. Council of Economic Advisers (1999) The effects of welfare policy and the economic expansion on welfare caseloads: an update, Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office, http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/CEA/html/ welfare/
53. White, S. (1997) Liberal equality, exploitation and the case for an unconditional basic income', Political Studies, 45, (3), 312-26.
54. White, S. (2000) Social rights and the social contract - Political theory and the new welfare politics', British Journal of Political Science, 30 (4), 507-32.
55. Widerquist, K. 'Reciprocity and the guaranteed income', Politics & Society, 27 (4), 387-402.
56. Yeatman, A. (1996) 'Interpreting contemporary contractualism', Australian Journal of Social Issues, 31 (1), 39-54.
57. Yeatman, A. (1997) 'Contract, status and personhood'. In G. Davis, B. Sullivan & A. Yeatman (eds) The New Contractualism? South Melbourne, Macmillan Education Australia.
58. Yeatman, A. (1999) 'Mutual obligation: What kind of contract is this?' Vol. 1 in S. Shaver & P. Saunders (eds) Social Policy for the 21st Century: Justice and Responsibility, SPRC Reports & Proceedings, No. 141, Kensington, N.S.W, Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.
59. Zedliewski, S.R. (1999) 'Work activity and obstacles to work amongTANF recipients'. Report # B-2, Series 'New Federalism: National Survey of America's Families'. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute, at http://newfederalism.urban.org/html/ series_b/b2/anf_b2.html