Using conceptual categories of questions to measure differences in retrieval performance

Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting

Volumn 33, Issue , 1996, Pages 238-242

  Keyes, John G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004908720     PISSN: 00447870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Filmore, C.J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1-88). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2. Graesser, A.C., Murachver, T. (1985). Symbolic procedures of question answering. In A.C. Graesser, J.B. Black (Eds.), The psychology of questions. Lawrence Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, 15-88.
3. Lehnert, W.G. (1978). The process of question answering: A computer simulation of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Liddy, E.D. (1993). An alternative representation for documents and queries. 14th National Online Meeting: proceedings, 1993, 279-284.
5. Porter, M.F. (1980). An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14(3), 130-137.
6. Robertson, S.E. (1974). Specificity and weighted retrieval. Journal of documentation, 30, 41-46.
7. Salton, G., McGill, M.J. (1983). Introduction to modem information retrieval. New York: McGraw Hill.
8. Vicekry, B., Vickery, A. (1992). An application of language processing for a search interface. Journal of documentation, 48, 255-275.