Differentiation of port wines by appearance using a sensory panel: Comparing free choice and conventional profiling

European Food Research and Technology

Volumn 211, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 65-71

  Cristovam, Eduarda ^a   Paterson, Alistair ^a   Piggott, John R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Appearance; Generalised; Port wines; Principal component analysis; Procrustes analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004906787     PISSN: 14382377     EISSN: 14382385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002170050590     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Reader HP, Dominguez M (1995) Fortified wines: sherry, port and Madeira. In: Lea AGH, Piggott JR (eds) Fermented beverage production. Blackie, London, pp 159-203
2. Francis FJ (1995) Food Qual Pref 6:149-155
3. Williams AA, Langron ST, Timberlake CF, Bakker J (1984) J Food Technol 19:659-671
4. Bakker J, Bridle P, Timberlake CF, Arnold GM (1986) Vitis 25:40-52
5. Lawless H, Liu Y-F (1997) J Sens Stud 4:317-332
6. Guy C, Piggott JR, Marie S (1989) Food Qual Pref 2:69-73
7. Noble AC (1984) J Sci Food Agric 35:88-98
8. Bakker J, Arnold GM (1993) Am J Enol Vitic 44:27-34
9. Williams A A, Langron SP (1984) J Sci Food Agric 35:558-568
10. MacFie HJ, Bratchell N (1989) J Sens Stud 4:129-148
11. Arnold GM, Williams AA (1986) The use of generalised Procrustes techniques in sensory analysis In: Piggott JR (ed) Statistical procedures in food research. Elsevier, London, pp 233-253
12. Piggott JR, Sharman K (1986) Methods to aid interpretation of multidimensional data In: Piggott JR (ed) Statistical procedures in food research. Elsevier, London, pp 181-232
13. Solomon GEA (1991) Language categorization in wine expertise. In: Lawless HT, Klein BP (eds) Sensory science theory and applications in food. IFT Basic Symposium Series, Dekker, New York, pp 269-294
14. Robertson G (1992) Port. Faber, London
15. Burnett JK (1985) Port. In: Birch GC, Lindley MG (eds) Alcoholic beverages. Elsevier, London, pp 161-169