Unification of vertical datums by gps and gravimetric geoid models using modified stokes formula

Marine Geodesy

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 261-273

  Nahavandchi, Hossein ^a   Sjöberg, Lars E ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Geoid; Gps; Gravity; Modified stokes formula; Vertical datums

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004862881     PISSN: 01490419     EISSN: 1521060X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01490419809388142     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ekman, M. 1989. Impacts of geodynamic phenomena on systems for height and gravity. Bull. Géod. 63:281-296.
2. Ekman, M. 1992. Postglacial rebound and sea level phenomena with special reference to Fennoscadia and the Baltic Sea. Espoo, Finland: Nordic Geodetic Commission 3rd Research School.
3. Forsberg, R. 1990. NKG Nordic standard geoid 1989. Proc. General Meeting of the Nordic Geodetic Commission, Copenhagen, pp. 75-82.
4. Forsberg, R., J. Kaminskis, and D. Solheim. 1996. Geoid of the Nordic and Baltic region from gravimetry and satellite altimetry. Proc. Int. Symp. on Gravity, Geoid and Marine Geodesy' (GRAGEOMAR), Tokyo, 1AG Symp. Ser. Vol. 117, pp. 540-547. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
5. Heiskanen, W., and H. Moritz. 1967. Physical geodesy. San Francisco: Freeman.
6. Molodenskij, M. S., V. F. Eremeev, and M. I. Yurkina. 1962. Methods for study of the external gravitational field and figure of the Earth. Washington DC: Office of Technical Services, Department of Commerce.
7. Pan, M., and L. E. Sjöberg. 1998. Unification of vertical datums by GPS and gravimetric geoid models with application to Fennoscadia. J. Geod. 72:64-70.
8. Rapp, R. H., and N. Balasubramania. 1992. A conceptual formulation of a world height system, Dept. Geod. Sci. Rep. 421. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
9. Ries, J. C., R. J. Eanes, C. K. Shum, and M. M. Watkins. 1992. Progress in the determination of the gravitational coefficient of the Earth. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19(6):529-531.
10. Rummel, R., and P. Teunissen. 1988. Height datum defintion, height datum connection and the role of the geodetic boundary value problem. Bull. Géod. 62:477-498.
11. Sjöberg, L. E. 1980. Least squares combination of satellite harmonics and integral formulas in physical geodesy. Gerlands Beiträge zur Geophysik 89:371-377.
12. Sjöberg, L. E. 1983. Land uplift and its implications on the geoid in Fennoscadia. Tectonophysics 97:97-101.
13. Sjöberg, L. E. 1986. Comparison of some methods of modifying Stokes' formula. Bolletino di Geodesia E Scienze Affini 45(3).
14. Sjöberg, L. E. 1989. The secular change of gravity and the geoid in Fennoscadia. In S. Gregersen, and P. W. Bashman (eds.). Earthquakes at North-Atlantic passive margins: neotectonics and postglacial rebound, Series C, Vol. 226, pp. 125-139. Kluwer.
15. Sjöberg, L. E. 1991a. Refined least-squares modification of Stokes formula. Manuscr. Geod. 16:367-375. Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
16. Sjöberg, L. E. 1991b. Aland GPS levelling campaign in 1987. Bull. Géod. 65:209-217.
17. Sjöberg, L. E., and H. Fan. 1986. Studies on the secular land uplift and long periodic variations of sea level around the coasts of Sweden, Rep. 1003. Stockholm, Sweden: Department of Geodesy and Photogrammetry, Royal Institute of Technology.
18. Vanicek, P., and A. Kleusberg. 1987. The Canadian Geoid-Stokesian approach. Manuscr. Geod. 19: 119-128.
19. Vaníček, P., and L. E. Sjöberg. 1991. Reformulation of Stokes' theory for higher than second degree reference field and modification of integration kernels. J. Ceophys. Res. 96(B4):6529-6539.
20. Vincent, S., and J. Marsh, 1974. Gravimetric global geoid. In G. Veis fed., Proc. Int. Symp. on the Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy and Geodynamics, National Technical University, Athens, Greece.
21. Wenzel, H. G. 1982. Geoid determination by least squares combination using integral kernels. IAG General Meeting, Tokyo.