The economic cost of the 1996 controlled flood

Geophysical Monograph Series

Volumn 110, Issue , 1999, Pages 351-357

  Harpman, David A ^a  

^a U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004784241     PISSN: 00658448     EISSN: 23288779     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1029/GM110p0351     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Bishop, R.C., KJ. Boyle, M.P. Welsh, R.M. Baumgartner, and P.C. Rathbun, Glen Canyon Dam Releases and Downstream Recreation: An Analysis of User Preferences and Economic Values. Glen Canyon Environmental Studies Report #27/87, 188 pp., Hagler Bailly Consult. Inc., Madison, WI, 1987. (NTIS No. PB88-183546/AS)
2. Brower, D.R., Let the river run through it, Sierra, Mar./Apr., pp. 42-43, 1997.
3. Bureau of Reclamation, Colorado River Simulation System-System Overview, 140 pp., Bur. Reel., Denver, CO, 1987.
4. Bureau of Reclamation, Colorado River Simulation System-User's Manual, 182 pp., Bur. Reel., Denver, CO, 1988.
5. Bureau of Reclamation, Glen Canyon Dam Interim Operating Criteria: Finding of No Significant Impact and Environmental Assessment, 71 pp., Bur. Reel., Salt Lake City, UT, 1991.
6. Bureau of Reclamation, Operation of Glen Canyon Dam: Final Environmental Impact Statement, 331 pp., Bur. Reel., Denver, CO, 1995.
7. Bureau of Reclamation, Glen Canyon Dam Beach/habitatbuilding Test Flow: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact, 68 pp., Bur. Reel, Salt Lake City, UT, 1996.
8. Environmental Defense Fund, ELFIN User's Manual, pp. VII-1-VII-4, Environ. Defense Fund, Oakland, CA, 1995.
9. Harpman, D.A., Glen Canyon Dam Beach/Habitat-Building Test Flow-An Ex Post Analysis of Hydropower Cost, 53 pp., Bur. Reel. Rept. #EC-97-01, Denver, CO, 1997 (NTIS No. PB97-159321).
10. Harpman, D.A., M.P. Welsh, and R.C. Bishop, Nonuse economic value: Emerging policy analysis tool, Rivers (4)4, 280-291, 1995.
11. Martin, R., A Story That Stands like a Dam, Glen Canyon and the Struggle for the Soul of the West, 354 pp., Henry Holt Co., New York, 1989.
12. Nathanson, M.N., Updating the Hoover Dam documents, 600 pp., U.S. Govt. Print. Off., Denver, CO, 1980.
13. Power Resources Committee, Power System Impacts of Potential Changes in Glen Canyon Power Plant Operations, Phase III Final Report, 305 pp., Stone Webster Manage. Consult., Inc., Denver, CO, 1995 (NTIS No. PB96-114004).
14. Staschus, K., A.M. Bell, and E. Cashman, Usable hydro capacity, electric utility production simulations, and reliability calculations, IEEE Trans. Power Sys., 5(2), 531-538, 1990.
15. Welsh, M.P, R.C. Bishop, M.L. Phillips, and R.M. Baumgartner. Glen Canyon Dam, Colorado River Storage Project, Arizona— Nonuse Value Study Final Report, 400 pp., Hagler Bailly Consult., Madison, WI, 1995. (NTIS No. PB98-105406).
16. Western Area Power Administration, Adjusted final post-1989 allocation of power: Salt Lake City area integrated power projects, Federal Register 54(163), pp. 35235-35239, 1989.
17. Western Area Power Administration, Financial Assessment High Discharge Experimental Flow Glen Canyon Dam (Qmax = 33,200) WY1994, 20 pp., West. Area Power Admin., Salt Lake City,UT, 1993a.
18. Western Area Power Administration, Financial Assessment High Discharge Experimental Flow Glen Canyon Dam (Qmax = 45,000) WY1994, 20 pp., West. Area Power Admin., Salt Lake City, UT, 1993b.
19. Western Area Power Administration, Financial Assessment High Discharge Experimental Flow Glen Canyon Dam (Qmax = 45,000) WY 1994 (Revised), 20 pp., West. Area Power Admin., Salt Lake City, UT, 1993c.
20. Western Area Power Administration, Western Financial Assessment: High Discharge Experimental Flow (Qmax = 52,000 and Qmax = 45,000 cfs) WY 1995, 25 pp., West. Area Power Admin., Salt Lake City, UT, 1994.
21. Wood, A.J. and B.F. Wollenberg, Power Generation, Operation and Control, 2nd ed., pp. 209-263, John Wiley, New York, 1996.