Phantom cultures of the Levantine Epipaleolithic

Antiquity

Volumn 70, Issue 267, 1996, Pages 139-147

  Barton, C Michael ^b   Neeley, Michael P ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004759705     PISSN: 0003598X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00082995     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BAMFORTH, D.B. 1986. Technological efficiency and tool curation, American Antiquity 51: 38-50.
2. BARTON, C.M. 1988. Lithic variability and Middle Paleolithic behavior: new evidence from the Iberian Peninsula. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series S408.
3. 1990. Stone tools and Paleolithic settlement in the Iberian Peninsula, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 56: 15-32.
4. 1991. Retouched stone tools: fact or fiction? Paradigms for interpreting chipped stone, in Clark 1991b: 143-63.
5. BARTON, C.M., D.I. OLSZEWSKI & N.R. COINMAN. 1996. Beyond the graver: reconsidering burin function, Journal of Field Archaeology 23: 1-15.
6. CLARK, G.A. 1989. Romancing the stones: biases, style and lithics at La Riera, in D.O. Henry & G.H. Odell (ed.), Alternative approaches to lithic analysis: 27-50. Washington (DC): American Anthropological Association. Archaeological papers 1.
7. 1991a. Introduction, in Clark 1991b: 3-22.
8. (Ed.). 1991b. Perspectives on the past: theoretical biases in Mediterranean hunter-gatherer research. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press.
9. DIBBLE, H. 1987. The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic scraper morphology, American Antiquity 52: 109-17.
10. 1988. Typological aspects of reduction and intensity of utilization of lithic resources in the French Mousterian, in H.L. Dibble & A. Montet-White (ed.), Upper Pleistocene prehistory of western Eurasia: 181-97. Philadelphia (PA): University Museum, University of Pennsylvania.
11. DUNNELL, R. 1986. Methodological issues in Americanist artifact classification, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 9: 149-207.
12. 1989. Aspects of the application of evolutionary theory in archaeology, in C.C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (ed.), Archaeological thought in America: 35-49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. FELLNER, R. 1995. Technology or typology?: a response to Neeley & Barton, Antiquity 69: 381-3.
14. FLENNIKEN, J. & A.W. RAYMOND. 1986. Morphological projectile point typology: replication, experimentation, and technological analysis, American Antiquity 51(3): 603-14.
15. FLENNIKEN, J. & P. WILKE. 1989. Typology, technology and chronology of Great Basin dart points, American Anthropologist 91(1): 149-58.
16. GORING-MORRIS, A.N. 1987. At the edge: terminal Pleistocene hunter-gatherers in the Negev and Sinai. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series S361.
17. GOULD, R., D. KOSTER & A. SONTZ. 1971. The lithic assemblage of the Western Desert Aborigines of Australia, American Antiquity 36(2): 149-68.
18. HENRY, D.O. 1989. From foraging to agriculture: the Levant at the end of the Ice Age. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press.
19. HOFFMAN, C.M. 1985. Projectile point maintenance and typology: assessment with factor analysis and canonical correlation in C. Carr (ed.), For concordance in archaeological analysis: 566-612. Prospect Heights (IL): Waveland Press.
20. KAUFMAN, D. 1995. Microburins and microliths of the Levantine Epipaleolithic: a comment on the paper by Neeley & Barton, Antiquity 69: 375-81.
21. KUHN, S.L. 1994. A formal approach to the design and assembly of mobile toolkits, American Antiquity 59(3): 426-42.
22. MAYR, E. 1976. Typological versus population thinking, in E. Mayr, Evolution and the diversity of life: 26-9. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
23. NEELEY, M.P. & C.M. BARTON. 1994. A new approach to interpreting late Pleistocene microlith industries in southwest Asia, Antiquity 68: 275-88.
24. NELSON, M.C. 1991. The study of technological organization, Archaeological Method and Theory 3: 57-100.
25. OLSZEWSKI, D.I. & C.M. BARTON. 1990. A note on biases in early excavations at Mugharet el-Wad and Nahal Oren, Levant 22: 43-6.
26. OLSZEWSKI, D.I. et al. 1994. The 1993 excavations at Yutil al-Hasa (WHS-784), an Upper/Epipaleolithic site in west-central Jordan, Paléorient 20: 129-41.
27. PALMER, C.T., B.E. FREDRICKSON & C.F. TILLEY. 1995. On cultural group selection, Current Anthropology 36: 657-8.
28. ROLLAND, N. 1981. The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic variability, Man 16: 15-42.
29. ROLLAND, N. & H.L. DIBBLE. 1990. A new synthesis of Middle Paleolithic variability. American Antiquity 55(3): 480-99.
30. SACKETT, J.R. 1982. Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 59-112.
31. 1985. Style and ethnicity in the Kalahari: a reply to Wiessner, American Antiquity 50: 154-9.
32. SAVAGE, S.L. 1990. Modeling the late Archaic social landscape, in K.M.S. Allen, S.W. Green & E.B.W. Zubrow (ed.), Interpreting space: GIS and archaeology: 330-55. London: Taylor & Francis.
33. SINOPOLI, C.M. 1991. Style in arrows: a study of an ethnographic collection from the western United States, Michigan discussions in anthropology, hunter-gatherer studies 10: 63-87.