Methodological issues in valuing forest ecosystem health

Ecosystem Health

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 54-55

  Hodges, Donald G ^a   Regens, James L ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004745276     PISSN: 10762825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arrow, K.K. & Fisher, A.C. (1974) Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 55, 313-319.
2. Bentkover, J.D. et al. (1986) Benefits Assessment: The State of the Art. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Boston.
3. Bishop, R.C. & Heberlein, T.A. (1990) The contingent valuation method. In: Johnson, R.L., Johnson, G.V. (eds.) Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Issues, Theory, and Applications, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
4. Boyle, K.J. & Bishop, R.C. (1987) The total value of wildlife: a case study involving endangered species. Water Resource Research 23, 943-950.
5. Cline, W.R. (1992) The Economics of Global Warming. Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C.
6. Cubbage, F.W. et al. (1993) Forest Resource Policy, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
7. d'Arge, R.C. et al. (1982) Carbon dioxide and intergenerational choice. American Economic Review 72, 251-256.
8. Fisher, A.C. & Hanemann, M.W. (1983) Endangered Species: The Economics of Irreversible Damage. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
9. Flint, M. (1992) Biological diversity and developing countries. In: Markandya A, Richardson, J, (eds.) Environmental Economics. pp. 437-469. St. Martin's Press, New York.
10. Freeman, A.M. (1979) The Benefits of Environmental Improvement: Theory and Practice. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
11. Harris, C.C. et al. (1989) Improving the contingent valuation method: a psychological perspective. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17, 213-229.
12. Hodges, D.G. et al. (1992) Regional forest migrations and potential economic effects. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 11, 1129-1136.
13. Holmes, T.P. & Kramer, R.A. (in press) Contingent valuation of ecosystem health. Ecosystem Health.
14. Johansson, P.O. (1987) The Economic Theory and Measurement of Environmental Benefits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
15. Krutilla, J.V. (1967) Conservation reconsidered. American Economic Review 57, 777-786.
16. Krutilla, J.V. & Fisher, A.C. (1975) The Economics of Natural Environments. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
17. Loomis, J.B. 1989. Test-Retest Reliability of Contingent Valuation Method: A Comparison of General Population and Visitor Response. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71, 76-84.
18. Mitchell, R.C. & Carson, R.T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods - The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources For The Future, Washington, D.C.
19. Randall, A. (1986) Human preferences, economics, and the preservation of species. In: Norton, B.G. (ed.) The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity. pp. 79-109. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
20. Regens, J.L. (1991) Measuring environmental benefits with contingent markets. Public Administration Review 51, 345-352.
21. Regens, J.L. et al. (1989) Climate change and U.S. forest markets. In: Topping, J.C. (ed.) Coping with Climate Change, pp. 303-309. Climate Institute, Washington, DC.
22. Smith, V.K. (1993) Nonmarket valuation of environmental resources: an interpretive appraisal. Land Economics 69, 1-26.
23. Stevens, B.H. (1991) Final Report on the Comparative Evaluations of Two Major Studies on the Employment Impacts of the ISC Northern Spotted Owl Conservation Strategy on Washington, Oregon, and California. American Forest Council, Forest Resources Technical Bulletin TB91-11. Washington, D.C.
24. Stevens, T.H. et al. (1991) Measuring the existence value of wildlife: what do CVM estimates really show? Land Economics 67, 390-400.
25. Weisbrod, B.A. (1964) Collective-consumption services of individual-consumption goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics 78, 471-477.