|
|
|
Volumn 41, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 329-373
|
|
End-of-life decision making, therapeutic jurisprudence, and preventive law: hierarchical v. consensus-based decision-making model.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CONSENSUS;
CUSTODY;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
FAMILY;
HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL;
HUMAN;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LIVING WILL;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
TERMINAL CARE;
THEORETICAL MODEL;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES;
CONSENSUS;
DECISION MAKING;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FAMILY;
HEALTH PERSONNEL;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MODELS, THEORETICAL;
NEGOTIATING;
PHYSICIAN'S ROLE;
PROXY;
TERMINAL CARE;
|
|
EID: 0004724707
PISSN: 0004153X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (7)
|
|
References (0)
|
