The "paradigm of family transcendence": Not a paradigm, questionably transcendent, but valuable, nonetheless

Journal of Marriage and Family

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 556-564

  Berscheid, Ellen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attraction; Interaction; Kin; Morphology; Relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004668185     PISSN: 00222445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/353716     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adams, B. N. (1988). Fifty years of family research: What does it mean? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 5-17.
2. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
3. Bahr, H. M., & Bahr, K. S. (1996). A paradigm of family transcendence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 541-555.
4. Berscheid, E. (1983). Emotion. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R., Close relationships (pp. 110-168). New York: Freeman.
5. Berscheid, E. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 79-129.
6. Berscheid, E., & Lopes, J. (in press). A temporal view of satisfaction, stability, and the environmental context of relationships. In R. J. Sternberg & M. Hojjat (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships. New York: Guilford.
7. Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. (in press). Interpersonal attraction and close relationships. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.). New York: Random House.
8. Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). Issues in studying close relationships: Conceptualizing and measuring closeness. In C Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 63-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Beutler, I. F., Burr, W. R., Bahr, K. S., & Herrin, D. A. (1989). The family realm: Theoretical contributions for understanding its uniqueness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 805-816.
10. Blumstein, P., & Kollock, P. (1988). Personal relationships. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 467-490.
11. Burman, B., & Margolin, G. (1992). Analysis of the association between marital relationships and health problems: An interactional perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 39-63.
12. Clark, M. S., & Reis, H. T. (1988). Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 609-672.
13. Coyne, J. C., & Downey, G. (1991). Social factors and psychopathology: Stress, social support and coping process. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 401-425.
14. Darley, J. M., & Berscheid, E. (1967). Increased liking as a result of the anticipation of personal contact. Human Relations, 20, 29-40.
15. Epstein, A. (1995, March 23). One house, one family, high court rules: AFDC to be based on numbers, not blood ties. Saint Paul Pioneer Press, p. A4.
16. Family values strong, but outlook troubling. (1989, October 10). Saint Paul Pioneer Press, p. A3.
17. Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723.
18. Fitz, D., & Gerstenzang, S. (1978). Anger in everyday life: When, where, and with whom? St. Louis: University of Missouri. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 160 966).
19. Funder, D. C., & Dobroth, K. N. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
20. Goldstein, A. G., & Papageorge, J. (1980). Judgments of facial attractiveness in the absence of eye movements. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 269-270.
21. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1990). What is family? Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
22. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
23. Hettema, J. M., Neale, M. C., & Kendler, K. S. (1995). Physical similarity and the equal-environment assumption in twin studies of psychiatric disorders Behavior Genetics, 25, 327-335.
24. Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. New York: Freeman.
25. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Malarkey, W. B., Cacioppo, J. T., & Glaser, R. (1994). Stressful personal relationships: Immune and endocrine function. In R. Glaser & J. K. Kiecolt-Glaser (Eds.), Handbook of human stress and immunity (pp. 321-339). New York: Academic Press.
26. Marks, S. R. (1994). Intimacy in the public relam: The case of co-workers. Social Forces, 72, 843-858.
27. Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary (10th ed.). (1993). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
28. Plomin, R., Willerman, L., & Loehlin, J. C. (1976). Resemblance in appearance and the equal environment assumption in twin studies of personality traits. Behavior Genetics, 6, 43-52.
29. Reiss, D. (1995). Genetic influence on family systems: Implications for development. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 543-560.
30. Rook, K. (1984). The negative side of social interaction: Impact on psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1097-1108.
31. Scanzoni, J., Polonko, K., Teachman, J., & Thompson, L. (1989). The sexual bond: Rethinking families and close relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Scarr, S., & Carter-Saltzman, L. (1979). Twin method: Defense of a critical assumption. Behavior Genetics, 9, 527-778.
33. Surra, C. A. (1991). What is family? No answer yet. Contemporary Psychology, 36, 897.
34. Thomas, D. L., & Wilcox, J. E. (1987). The rise of family theory: A historical and critical analysis. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 81-102). New York: Plenum.