Sexual systems of new Caledonian Araliaceae: A preliminary phylogenetic reappraisal

Edinburgh Journal of Botany

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 221-228

  Schlessman, M A ^a   Plunkett, G M ^b   Lowry II, P P ^c,d   Lloyd, D G ^e  

^a VASSAR COLLEGE   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^d MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Andromonoecy; Apiaceae; Apiales; Dioecy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004597830     PISSN: 09604286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0960428601000592     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BAKER, H. G. (1967). Support for Baker's law - as a rule. Evolution 21: 853-856.
2. BAKER, H. G. & COX. P. A. (1984). Further thoughts on dioecism and islands. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 71: 244-253.
3. BAWA, K. S. (1980). Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 15-40.
4. BERTIN, R. I. (1982). The evolution and maintenance of andromonoecy. Evol. Theory 6: 25-32.
5. CARLQUIST, S. (1974). Island Biology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
6. GODLEY, E. J. (1979). Flower biology in New Zealand. New Zealand J. Bot. 17: 441-446.
7. KOUL, P., SHARMA, N. & KOUL, A. K. (1993). Pollination biology of Apiaceae. Curr. Sci. 50: 219-222.
8. LOWRY II, P. P., PLUNKETT, G. M. & OSKOLSKI, A. A. (2001). Early lineages in Apiales: insights from morphology, wood anatomy and molecular data. Edinb. J. Bot. 58 (2): 207-220.
9. MADDISON, W. P. & MADDISON, D. R. (1992). MacClade Versions. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
10. PLUNKETT, G. M., SOLTIS, D. E. & SOLTIS, P. S. (1996). Higher level relationships of Apiales (Apiaceae and Araliaceae) based on phylogenetic analysis of rbcL sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 499-515.
11. PLUNKETT, G. M., SOLTIS, D. E. & SOLTIS, P. S. (1997). Clarification of the relationship between Apiaceae and Araliaceae based on matK and rbcL sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 84: 565-580.
12. PLUNKETT, G. M., LOWRY II, P. P. & BURKE, M. K. (2001). The phylogenetic status of Polyscias (Araliaceae) based on nuclear ITS sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. (in press).
13. SAKAI, A. K., WAGNER, W. L., FERGUSON, D. M. & HERBST, D. R. (1995). Origins of dioecy in the Hawaiian flora. Ecology 76: 2517-2529.
14. SCHLESSMAN, M. A., LLOYD, D. G. & LOWRY II, P. P. (1990). Evolution of sexual systems in New Caledonian Araliaceae. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 55: 105-117.
15. THOMSON, J. D. & BARRETT, S. C. H. (1981). Selection for outcrossing, sexual selection, and the evolution of dioecy in plants. Amer. Naturalist 118: 443-449.
16. THOMSON, J. D. & BRUNET, J. (1990). Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 11-16.
17. WAGNER, W. L., HERBST, D. R. & SOHMER, S. H. (1990). Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawai'i. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press & Bishop Museum Press.
18. WILLSON, M. F. (1983). Plant Reproductive Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19. YAMPLOSKY, C. & YAMPLOSKY, H. (1922). Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Biblioth. Genet. 3: 1-62.