Effects of Hunger State on Within-Session Response Decreases under CRF Schedule

Learning and Motivation

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-20

  Aoyama, Kenjiro ^a  

^a DOSHISHA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004581996     PISSN: 00239690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/lmot.1999.1040     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aitken C. M. Jr., Braggio J. T., Ellen P. Effects of prefeeding on the DRL performance of rats with septal lesions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 89:1975;546-555.
2. Aoyama K. Satiation effect on within-session changes in rat feeding behavior. Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology. 47:1997;37-45.
3. Aoyama K. Within-session response rate in rats decreases as a function of amount eaten. Physiology & Behavior. 64:1998;765-769.
4. Balagura S., Coscina D. V. Periodicity of food intake in the rat as measured by an operant response. Physiology & Behavior. 3:1968;641-643.
5. Bare J. K., Cicala G. Deprivation and time of testing as determinants of food intake. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 53:1960;151-154.
6. Batten D. E., Shoemaker H. A. The effects of deprivation and incentive palatability on a conditioned operant response. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 54:1961;577-579.
7. Bousfield W. A. Quantitative indices of the effects of fasting on eating-behavior. Journal of Genetic Psychology. 46:1935;476-479.
8. Collier G., Hirsch E., Kanarek R. The operant revisited. Honig W. K., Staddon J. E. R. Handbook of operant behavior. 1977;28-52 Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
9. Collier G. H., Rovee-Collier C. K. A comparative analysis of optimal foraging behavior: Laboratory simulations. Kamil A. C., Sargent T. Foraging behavior: Ecological, ethological and psychological approaches. 1981;39-76 Garland, New York.
10. Davis J. D., Smith G. P. Analysis of lick rate measures the positive and negative feedback effects of carbohydrates on eating. Appetite. 11:1988;229-238.
11. Eisman E., Linton M., Theios J. The relationship between response strength and one parameter of the hunger drive. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 53:1960;359-363.
12. Killeen P. R. Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: The dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 64:1995;405-431.
13. Kissileff H. R. Food-associated drinking in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 67:1969;284-300.
14. Kissileff H. R., Thornton J. Facilitation and inhibition in the cumulative food intake curve in man. Morrison A. J., Strick P. Changing concepts of the nervous system. 1982;585-607 Academic Press, New York.
15. Kissileff H. R., Thornton J., Becker E. A. A quadratic equation adequately describes the cumulative food intake curve in man. Appetite. 3:1982;255-272.
16. Kohn M. Satiation of hunger from food injected directly into the stomach versus food ingested by mouth. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 44:1951;412-422.
17. Levitsky D. A. Feeding patterns of rats in response to fasts and changes in environmental conditions. Physiology & Behavior. 5:1970;291-300.
18. McCleery R. H. On satiation curves. Animal Behaviour. 25:1977;1005-1015.
19. McSweeney F. K. Rate of reinforcement and session duration as determinants of within-session patterns of responding. Animal Learning & Behavior. 20:1992;160-169.
20. McSweeney F. K., Hinson J. M., Cannon C. B. Sensitization-habituation may occur during operant conditioning. Psychological Bulletin. 120:1996;256-271.
21. McSweeney F. K., Roll J. M. Do animals satiate or habituate to repeatedly presented reinforcers? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 5:1998;428-442.
22. McSweeney F. K., Roll J. M., Weatherly J. N. Within-session changes in responding during several simple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 62:1994;109-132.
23. Premack D. Predicting instrumental performance from the independent rate of the contingent response. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 61:1961;163-171.
24. Roll J. M., McSweeney F. K., Johnson K. S., Weatherly J. N. Satiety contributes little to within-session decreases in responding. Learning and Motivation. 26:1995;323-341.
25. Shuford E. H. J. Palatability and osmotic pressure of glucose and sucrose solutions as determinants of intake. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 52:1959;150-153.
26. Skinner B. F. Drive and reflex strength. Journal of General Psychology. 6:1932a;22-37.
27. Skinner B. F. Drive and reflex strength. II. Journal of General Psychology. 6:1932b;38-48.
28. Swithers S. E., Martinson F. A. Habituation of oral responding in adult rats. Behavioral Neuroscience. 112:1998;213-224.
29. Teitelbaum P., Campbell B. A. Ingestion patterns in hyperphagic and normal rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 51:1958;135-141.
30. Weingarten H. P. Conditioned cues elicit feeding in sated rats: A role for learning in meal initiation. Science. 220:1983;431-433.
31. Weingarten H. P., Martin G. M. Mechanisms of conditioned meal initiation. Physiology & Behavior. 45:1989;735-740.