Event history analysis of authors' reputation: Effects of critics' attention on debutants' careers

Poetics

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 317-333

  Van Rees, Kees ^a   Vermunt, Jeroen ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004532738     PISSN: 0304422X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0304-422X(96)00002-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allison, P.D., 1982. Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. S. Leinhardt (ed.), Sociological methodology, 61-98. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Allison, P.D., 1984. Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Blossfeld, H., A. Hamerle and K.U. Mayer, 1989. Event history analysis: Statistical theory and application in the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bourdieu, P., 1980. The production of belief: Contribution to an economy of symbolic goods. Media, Culture and Society 2, 261-293.
5. Bourdieu, Pierre, 1984 [1979]. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Bourdieu, P., 1983. The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics 12, 311-355.
7. Dorleijn, G.J. and C.J. van Rees, 1995. Literatuuropvattingen in het literaire veld: Een toelichtende reactie [Conceptions of literature in the literary field: an explanatory reply]. Spektator 24, 183-187.
8. Haberman, S.J., 1978. Analysis of quantitative data, Vol. 1, Introduction topics. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.
9. Hachen, D.S., 1988. The competing risk model: A method for analyzing processes with multiple types of events. Sociological Methods and Research 17, 21-54.
10. Janssen, Susanne, 1994. In het licht van de kritiek. Variaties en patronen in de aandacht van de literatuurkritiek voor auteurs en hun werken. [In light of criticism: Variations and patterns of reviewers' attention for writers and their work.] Doctoral dissertation, University of Tiburg.
11. Mare, R.D., 1994. Discrete-time bivariate hazards with unobserved heterogeneity: A partially observed contingency table approach. P.V. Marsden (ed.), Sociological methodology, 341-385. Oxford: Blackwell.
12. Nooy, W. de, 1991. Social networks and classification in literature. Poetics 20, 507-537.
13. Rees, C.J. van, 1983. How a literary work becomes a masterpiece. Poetics 12: 397-417.
14. Rees, C.J. van, 1987. How reviewers reach consensus on the value of literary works. Poetics 16, 275-294.
15. Rees, C.J. van and G.J. Dorleijn, 1994. Literatuuropvattingen in het literaire veld. Over de integratie van twee benaderingen. [Conceptions of literature in the literary field: On the integration of two approaches]. Spektator 23(2), 91-114.
16. Rees, C.J. van, H. Verdaasdonk, P. Bourdieu and S.J. Schmidt, 1991. Panel discussion on the structure of the literary field. In: E. Ibsch, D.Schram and G.Steen (eds.), Empirical studies in literature. Proceedings of the Second IGEL-conference, Amsterdam, 1989, 427-444. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
17. Smith, Edward E., 1988. Concepts and thought. In: R.J. Sternberg and Edward E. Smith (eds.), The psychology of human thought, 19-49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Verdaasdonk, H., 1987. Effects of acquired readership and reviewers' attention on the sales of new literary works. Poetics 16, 237-253.
19. Vermunt, J.K., 1993. LEM: Log-linear and event history analysis with missing data using the EM algorithm. WORC PAPER 93.09.015/7, Tilburg University.
20. Yamaguchi, K., 1991. Event history analysis. Applied Social Research Methods, Vol. 28. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.