Sandercock: 'Expanding the language of planning'

European Planning Studies

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 545-548

  Healey, Patsy ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004504399     PISSN: 09654313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09654319908720536     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. SANDERCOCK, L. (1998) Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. London: Wiley.
2. RODRIGUEZ-BACHILLER, A. (1988) Town Planning Education. Aldershot: Gower.
3. This is reflected in the difficulty of translating the very word 'planning' into different European languages (WILLIAMS, R.H. (1996) European Spatial Policy and Planning. London: Paul Chapman Publishing).
4. For example, in Germany and Italy, and parts of Eastern Europe.
5. As in much of Eastern Europe.
6. RTPI (1990) Education Policy. London: RTPI.
7. See AESOP (1995) Statement on Education Policy. Stockholm: KTH.
8. Scandinavia in the present period seems to be a rich source of such examples.
9. Bo.NTICUOGU, S. and MARECGI, M. (Eds) (1997) // tempo e la cittajra natura e sloria: Allante di progetti sui tempi delta citta. Rome: Institute Nazionale di Urbanistica;
10. MADANIPOUR, A., CARS, G. and ALLEN, J. (1998) Social Exclusion in European Cities: processes experiences and responses. London: Jessica Kingsley.
11. FRJEDMANN.J. (1987) Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. SCHON, D. (1983) The Reßectize Practitioner. New York: Basic
13. Books; SCHON, D. and REIN, M. (1994) Frame Reflection. New York: Basic Books.
14. HEALEY, P. (1991) The content of planning education programmes, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 18(2), pp. 177-189.
15. FORESTER, J. (1989) Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.