Land use, risk, and superfund cleanups: At the nexus of policy and practice

Public Works Management and Policy

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 31-40

  Hersh, Robert ^a   Wernstedt, Kris ^a  

^a RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004447875     PISSN: 1087724X     EISSN: 15527549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1087724X9941004     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Browner, C. M. (1997, March 12). Transcript of statement of Carol M. Browner, administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, before the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, 105th Cong., 1st Sess. 3.
2. English, M. R., Feldman, D. L., Inerfeld, R., & Lumley, J. (1997). Institutional controls at Superfund sites: A preliminary assessment of their efficacy and public acceptability. Knoxville, TN: Joint Institute for Energy and the Environment.
3. Hamilton, J. T., & Viscusi, W. K. (1995). The magnitude and policy implications of health risks from hazardous waste sites. In R. L. Revesz& R. B. Stewart (Eds.), Analyzing Superfund: Economics, science, and law(pp. 55-82). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
4. Hamilton, J. T.,& Viscusi, W. K. (1999). How costly is "clean" An analysis of the benefits and costs of Superfund site remediations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(1), 2-27.
5. Hirschhorn, J. S. (1992). Definition and analysis of stubborn Superfund problems. In Working papers on Superfund reform(pp. 53-82). Alexandria, VA: Clean Sites.
6. Mazurek, J., & Hersh, R. (1997). Land use and remedy selection: The Abex site. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
7. Probst, K., Fullerton, D., Litan, R., & Portney, P. (1995). Footing the bill for Superfund cleanups: Who pays and how?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and Resources for the Future.
8. Russell, M. (1995, January). Contamination or risk: Cost implications of alternative Superfund configurations. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Economics Association, Washington, DC.
9. Travis, C. (1995). Testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on Superfund, Waste Control, and Risk Assessment, 104th Cong., 1st Sess.
10. U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, Pub. L. No. 96-510, 94 Stat. 2767 (1980), codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675 (1988 and Supp. IV 1992).
11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1986). Interim guidance on Superfund selection of remedy(OSWERDirective No. 9355.0-19). Washington, DC: Author.
12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989a). The remedial investigation, site characterization and treatability studies(OSWER Directive No. 9355.3-01FS2). Washington, DC: Author.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989b). Risk assessment guidance for Superfund: Volume I. Human health evaluation manual (Part A)(Interim final report, EPA/540/1-89/002). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
14. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1991). Role of the baseline risk assessment in Superfund remedy selection decisions(OSWER Directive No. 9355.0-30). Washington, DC: Author.
15. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1995). Land use decisions in the remedial process(OSWER Directive No. 9355.0-55, EPA/540/R-95/037, PB95-963230). Washington, DC: Author.
16. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1995). Superfund: Operations and maintenance activities will require billions of dollars(GAO/RCED-95-259). Washington, DC: Author.
17. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1998a). Hazardous waste: Information on potential Superfund sites(GAO/RCED-99-22). Washington, DC: Author.
18. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1998b). Superfund: Times to complete site listing and cleanup(GAO/T-RCED-98-74). Washington, DC: Author.
19. Walker, K., Sadowitz, M.,& Graham, J. D. (1995). Confronting Superfund mythology. In R. L. Revesz & R. B. Stewart (Eds.), Analyzing Superfund: Economics, science, and law(pp. 25-53). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
20. Wernstedt, K., & Hersh, R. (1997). Land use and remedy selection: The Fort Ord site. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
21. Wernstedt, K., Hersh, R., & Probst, K. (1999). Grounding hazardous waste cleanups: A promising remedy?Land Use Policy, 16(1), 45-55.
22. Wernstedt, K.,& Probst, K. (1997). Land use and remedy selection: The Industri-Plex site. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.