|
|
|
Volumn 9, Issue , 1999, Pages
|
|
Too many physicians: physician-assisted suicide after Glucksberg/Quill.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;
ACTIVE EUTHANASIA;
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
CANADA;
COMPASSION IN DYING V. STATE OF WASHINGTON;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DEATH WITH DIGNITY ACT (OREGON);
ETHICS;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
NETHERLANDS;
PAIN;
PALLIATIVE THERAPY;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PHYSICIAN;
POLICY;
RIGHT TO DIE;
TERMINAL CARE;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UNITED STATES;
VACCO V. QUILL;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
COMPASSION IN DYING V. STATE OF WASHINGTON;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DEATH WITH DIGNITY ACT (OREGON);
LEGAL APPROACH;
VACCO V. QUILL;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
ANALGESICS, OPIOID;
CANADA;
COERCION;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
NETHERLANDS;
PAIN;
PALLIATIVE CARE;
PHYSICIANS;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RIGHT TO DIE;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
TERMINAL CARE;
TERMINALLY ILL;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
WEDGE ARGUMENT;
|
|
EID: 0004413522
PISSN: 10594280
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (3)
|
|
References (0)
|
