Resonances while surmounting a fluctuating barrier

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 1170-1175

  Iwaniszewski, J ^a,b   Kaufman, I K ^a,c   McClintock, P V E ^a   McKane, A J ^d  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NICOLAUS COPERNICUS UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^c CENTER FOR GRAVITATION AND FUNDAMENTAL METROLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION TIME; FLUCTUATING BARRIER; META-STABLE STATE; NOISE STRENGTH; NON-MONOTONIC VARIATION; ORNSTEIN-UHLENBECK; POTENTIAL BARRIERS; RESONANT ACTIVATION;

CHEMICAL ACTIVATION;

EID: 0004269615     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.1170     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ch. R. Doering and J. C. Gadoua, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2318 (1992).
2. U. Zürcher and Ch. R. Doering, Phys. Rev. E 47, 3862 (1993)
3. Phys. Rev. EC. Van den Broeck, 47, 4579 (1993)
4. M. Bier and R. D. Astumian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1649 (1993)
5. M. Boguña, J. M. Porra, J. Masoliver, and K. Lindenberg, Phys. Rev. E 57, 3937 (1998).
6. P. Reimann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4576 (1995).
7. P. Reimann, Phys. Rev. E 52, 1579 (1995).
8. M. Marchi, F. Marchesoni, L. Gammaitoni, E. Menichella-Saetta, and S. Santucci, Phys. Rev. E 54, 3479 (1996).
9. F. Marchesoni, L. Gammaitoni, E. Menichella-Saetta, and S. Santucci, Phys. Lett. A 201, 275 (1995).
10. P. Reimann, R. Bartussek, and P. Hänggi, Chem. Phys. 235, 11 (1998).
11. J. Iwaniszewski, Phys. Rev. E 54, 3173 (1996).
12. P. Reimann, Phys. Rev. E 49, 4938 (1994).
13. P. Hänggi, Chem. Phys. 180, 157 (1994).
14. D. G. Luchinsky, P. V. E. McClintock, and M. I. Dykman, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 889 (1998).
15. The nonmonotonicities of (Formula presented) at the high-τ end in Figs. 11 and 22 and at the small-τ end in Figs. 44 and 55 must be understood as artifacts. The absolute value of Z in these cases is comparable with the accuracy of the measurement, so that the logarithmic scale of the ordinate enhances experimental errors in a misleading way.
16. R. S. Maier and D. L. Stein, Phys. Rev. E 48, 931 (1993)
17. D. G. Luchinsky and P. V. E. McClintock, Nature (London) 389, 463 (1997).
18. P. Reimann and T. C. Elston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5328 (1996).
19. P. Pechukas and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2772 (1994).
20. P Reimann, G. J. Schmid, and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1 (1999).