Soil-site relations for trembling aspen in Northwest Ontario

Northern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 146-153

  Carmean, Willard H ^a   Li, Janjun ^b  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ESRI Canada   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004094933     PISSN: 07426348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/njaf/15.3.146     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ADAMS, R.D. (ED.). 1990. Aspen symposium. '89 Proceedings. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-GTR-140. 348 p.
2. CARMEAN, W.H. 1972. Site index curves for upland oaks in the Central States. For. Sci. 18:109-120.
3. CARMEAN, W.H. 1975. Forest site quality evaluation in the United States. Adv. Agron. 27:209-269.
4. CARMEAN, W.H. 1985. Site quality for hardwoods in the boreal forest of Canada. P. 51-65 in Proc. of Kempe symp. "Broadleaves in Boreal Silviculture - an Obstacle or an Asset?" Rapporter 14, Swedish Univ. Agric. Sci. Fac. For., Umeå, Sweden. 252 p.
5. CARMEAN, W.H. 1996a. Forest site-quality estimation using forest ecosystem classification in Northwestern Ontario. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 39:493-508.
6. CARMEAN, W.H. 1996b. Site-quality evaluation, site-quality maintenance, and site-specific management for forest land in northwest Ontario. Ont. Min. Natur. Resour., Northwest Reg. Sci. and Tech. Unit, NWST Tech. Rep. TR-105, Thunder Bay, Ontario. 121 p.
7. CARMEAN, W.H., AND R.R. LAVALLEY. 1996. Soil-site relations for young white spruce plantations in north central Ontario. Lakehead Univ. Fac. For., Thunder Bay, ON. (unpublished ms.)
8. CARMEAN, W.H., J.T. HAHN, AND R.D. JACOBS. 1989. Site index curves for eastern forest species. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-GTR-128. 142 p.
9. CARMEAN, W.H., G. HAZENBERG, G.P. NIZNOWSKI AND K. DESCHAMPS. 1996. Height-growth and site-index curves for trembling aspen in Northwest Ontario. Lakehead Univ. Fac. For., Thunder Bay, Ontario, (unpublished ms.)
10. CHATFIELD, C. AND A.J. COLLINS. 1980. Introduction to multivariate analysis. Chapman and Hill, London, U.K. 246 p.
11. CHATTERJEE, S., AND B. PRICE. 1977. Regression analysis by example. Wiley, New York. 228 p.
12. COILE, T.S. 1952. Soil and the growth of forests. Adv. Agron. 4:330-398.
13. DAVIDSON, R.W., R.C. ATKINS, R.D. FRY, G.D. RACEY AND D.G. WEINGARTNER. 1988. A silvicultural guide for the poplar working group in Ontario. Ont. Min. Natur. Resour., Sci. and Tech. Ser., Vol. V, Toronto, Ontario. 67 p.
14. DAY, J.H. 1983. The Canadian Soil Information System (CanSIS) manual for describing soils in the field. Land Resour. Res. Inst., Agric. Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. 97 p.
15. DESCHAMPS, K.C. 1991. Height growth and site index curves of trembling aspen in North Central Ontario. M.Sc.F. thesis, Lakehead Univ. Sch. For., Thunder Bay, Ontario. 109 p.
16. DYER, M.E., AND R.L. BAILEY. 1987. A test of six methods for estimating tree heights from stem analysis data. For. Sci. 33:3-13.
17. ESU, I.E., AND D.F. GRIGAL. 1979. Productivity of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) as related to soil mapping units in Northern Minnesota. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43:1189-1192.
18. FRALISH, J.S. 1972. Youth, maturity, and old age, P. 52-58 in Aspen Symp. Proc. USDA. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-GTR-1. 54 p.
19. FRALISH, J.S., AND O.L. LOUCKS. 1975. Site quality evaluation models for aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) in Wisconsin. Can. J. For. Res. 5:523-528.
20. HAGGLUND, B. 1981. Evaluation of forest site productivity. Commonw. For. Bur., For. Abs. Rev. 42(11):515-527.
21. HEARNDEN, K.W., S.V. MILLSON AND W.C. WILSON. 1992. A report on the status of forest regeneration. Ontario Min. Natur. Resour., For. Audit Sec., Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. 117 p.
22. HUSCH, B., C.I. MILLER, AND T.W. BEERS. 1982. Forest mensuration. Wiley, New York. 402 p.
23. KITTEREDGE, J., JR. 1938. The interrelations of habitat, growth rate, and associated vegetation in the aspen community of Minnesota and Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 5:151-246.
24. LANNER, R.M. 1985. On the insensitivity of height growth to spacing. For. Ecol. Manage. 13:143-148.
25. LEBLANC, P.A. 1994. Soil-site relations for jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) in Northeastern Ontario. M.Sc. For. Thesis, Lakehead Univ. Sch. For., Thunder Bay, Ontario. 180 p.
26. LI, Y. 1991. Soil-site relations for trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) in Northwestern Ontario. M.Sc.For. thesis, Lakehead Univ. Sch. For., Thunder Bay, Ontario. 127 p.
27. MCKEAGUE, J.A. (ED.). 1978. Manual on soil sampling and methods of analysis. Ed. 2. Can. Soc. Soil Sci. 212 p.
28. MEYER, D. 1956. The relation of soil horizon texture and acidity to the site index of aspen in northern Minnesota. Univ. Minn. Sch. For., Minn. For. Note 52, St. Paul, MN. 2 p.
29. st century. For. Canada, Northwest Reg. and Poplar Council of Canada, Edmonton, Alberta. 172 p.
30. NAVRATIL, S., L.G. BRACE, E.A. SAUDER, AND S. Lux. 1994. Silvicultural and harvesting options to favor immature white spruce and aspen regeneration in boreal mixedwoods. Can. For. Serv. No. For. Cent. Inf. Rep. NOR-X-337, Edmonton, Alberta. 78 p.
31. NIE, N.H. 1983. SPSSX user's guide. McGraw-Hill, New York. 806 p.
32. ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES. 1993. The timber resources of Ontario - 1993. Ontario Min. Nat. Resour., Sault Ste. Marie, ON. 67 p.
33. PERALA, D.A. 1990. Quaking aspen, P. 555-569 in Silvics of North America: Vol. 2. Hardwoods.
34. Bums, R.M., and B.H. Honkala (tech. coords.). USDA For Serv. Agric. Handb. 654, Washington, DC. 877 p.
35. PETERSON, E.G., AND N.M. PETERSON. 1992. Ecology, management, and use of aspen and balsam poplar in the prairie provinces. For. Canada North. For. Cent. Spec. Rep. 1, Edmonton, AB. 252 p.
36. PRITCHETT, W.L., AND R.F. FISHER. 1987. Properties and management of forest soils. Ed. 2. Wiley, New York. 494 p.
37. SCHMIDT, M.G., AND W.H. CARMEAN. 1988. Jack pine site quality in relation to soil and topography in North Central Ontario. Can. J. For. Res. 18:297-305.
38. SHIELDS, W.J., JR., AND J.G. BOCKHEIM. 1981. Deterioration of trembling aspen clones in the Great Lakes region. Can. J. For. Res. 11:530-537.
39. SIMS, R.A., W.D. TOWILL, K.A. BALDWIN, AND G.M. WICKWARE. 1989. Field guide to the forest ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario. Ont. Min. Natur. Resour., Northwest. Ont. For. Tech. Dev. Unit, Thunder Bay, Ontario. 191 p.
40. SPURR, S.H., AND B.V. BARNES. 1980. Forest ecology. Ed. 3. Wiley, New York. 687 p.
41. STOECKELER, J.H. 1948. The growth of quaking aspen as affected by soil properties and fire. J. For. 46:727-737.
42. STOECKELER, J.H. 1960. Soil factors affecting the growth of quaking aspen forests in the Lake States. Univ. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 233, St. Paul, MN. 48 p.
43. STROTHMANN, R.O. 1960. Evaluating the growth potential of aspen lands in northern Minnesota. USDA For. Serv. Lake States For. Res. Sta., Sta. Pap. 86. 20 p.
44. VOIGT, G.K., M.L. HEINSELMAN, AND Z.A. ZASADA. 1957. The effect of soil characteristics on the growth of quaking aspen in northern Minnesota. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 21:649-652.
45. WEISBERG, S. 1980. Applied linear regression. Wiley, New York. 283 p.