Projection Dynamics in Godunov-Type Schemes

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 142, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 412-427

  Xu, Kun ^a   Hu, Jishan ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERFACE STATES; PHASE INTERFACES; SHEAR FLOW;

ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA; DENSITY FLUCTUATION; EULER SOLUTIONS; FIRST ORDER; FLOW VARIABLE; GAS EVOLUTION; GODUNOV-TYPE SCHEMES; NUMERICAL FLUX; PRESSURE WIGGLES; RIEMANN SOLVER;

SHEAR WAVES;

EID: 0003864752     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1998.5923     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abgrall R. How to prevent pressure oscillations in multicomponent flow calculations: A quasi conservative approach. J. Comput. Phys. 125:1996;150.
2. M. Arora, P. Roe, On post-shock oscillations due to shock capturing schemes in unsteady flows, J. Comput. Phys.
3. Colella P., Woodward P. The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas dynamical calculations. J. Comput. Phys. 54:1984;174.
4. Gilbarg D., Paolucci D. The structure of shock waves in the continuum theory of fluids. J. Rational Mech. Anal. 2:1953;617.
5. Hui W. H. Accurate Computation of Discontinuous Flow - The Role of Coordinates, 2nd Asia CFD Conference. 1996.
6. Jin S., Liu J. The effects of numerical viscosity I: Slowly moving shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 126:1996;373.
7. Karni S., Canic S. Computations of slowly moving shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 136:1997;132.
8. Karni S. Multicomponent flow calculations by a consistent primitive algorithm. J. Comput. Phys. 112:1994;31.
9. Larrouturou B. How to preserve the mass fraction positive when computing compressible multi-component flow. J. Comput. Phys. 95:1991;59.
10. Lin H. C. Dissipation additions to flux-difference splitting. J. Comput. Phys. 117:1995;20.
11. M. S. Liou, Probing numerical fluxes: Mass flux, positivity, and entropy-satisfying property, 1997.
12. Noh W. F. Errors for calculations of strong shocks using an artificial viscosity and an artificial heat flux. J. Comput. Phys. 72:1987;78.
13. Quirk J. A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate. Int. J. for Num. Methods in Fluids. 18:1994;555.
14. Roberts T. W. The Behavior of flux difference splitting near slowly moving shock waves. J. Comput. Phys. 90:1990;141.
15. Sweby P. R. High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Num. Anal. 21:1984;995.
16. Woodward P., Colella P. The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54:1984;115.
17. Xu K., Martinelli L., Jameson A. Gas-kinetic finite volume methods, flux-vector splitting and artificial diffusion. J. Comput. Phys. 120:1995;48.
18. Xu K. Gas-Kinetic Schemes for Unsteady Compressible Flow Simulations. 1998;von Karman Institute.
19. K. Xu, J. Hu, Projection dynamics in Godunov-type schemes: To the physical understanding of postshock oscillations, http://www.math.ntnu.no/conservation/.
20. Zel'dovich Ya. B., Raizer Yu. P. Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena. 1966.