Sensitivity Analysis in Biomolecular Simulation

Reviews in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 12, Issue , 1998, Pages 281-326

  Wong, Chung F ^a   Thacher, Tom ^b   Rabitz, Herschel ^c  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Virtual Chemistry Inc   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMOLECULAR SIMULATION; ERROR PROPAGATION ANALYSIS; FORCE FIELD PARAMETERS;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0003790282     PISSN: 10693599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. J. A. McCammon and S. C. Harvey, Dynamics of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
2. C. L. Brooks III, M. Karplus, and B. M. Pettitt, Proteins: A Theoretical Perspective of Dynamics, Structure, and Thermodynamics, Wiley, New York, 1988.
3. T. P. Lybrand, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1990, Vol. 1, pp. 295-320. Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems Using Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Perturbation Methods.
4. A. E. Torda and W. F. van Gunstersen, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1992, Vol. 3, pp. 143-172. Molecular Modeling Using NMR Data.
5. T. P. Straatsma, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1996, Vol. 9, pp. 81-127. Free Energy by Molecular Simulation.
6. R. Tomovick and M. Vukobratovic, General Sensitivity Theory, American Elsevier, New York, 1972.
7. P. Franck, Introduction to System Sensitivity Theory, Academic Press, New York, 1987.
8. L. Eno and H. Rabitz, Adv. Chem. Phys., 51, 177 (1982), Sensitivity Analysis and Its Role in Quantum Scattering Theory.
9. H. Rabitz, M. Kramer, and D. Dacol, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 34, 419 (1983). Sensitivity Analysis in Chemical Kinetics.
10. H. Rabitz, Chem. Rev., 87, 101 (1987). Chemical Dynamics and Kinetics Phenomena as Revealed by Sensitivity Analysis Techniques.
11. H. Rabitz, Science, 246, 221 (1989). System Analysis at the Molecular Scale.
12. G. E. Forsythe, M. A. Malcolm, A. Michael, and C. B. Moler, Computer Methods for Mathematical Computations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977.
13. T. W. Anderson, An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1958.
14. U. Dinur and A. T. Hagler, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 99-164. New Approaches to Empirical Force Fields.
15. J. P. Bowen and N. L. Allinger, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 81-97. Molecular Mechanics: The Art and Science of Parameterization.
16. W. F. van Gunsteren and H. J. C. Berendsen, GROMOS, Groningen, Netherlands, 1987.
17. S.-b. Zhu and C. F. Wong, J. Chem. Phys., 98, 8892 (1993). Sensitivity Analysis of Water Thermodynamics.
18. R. E. Bleil, C. F. Wong, and H. Rabitz, J. Phys. Chem., 99, 3379 (1995). Sensitivity Analysis of a Two-Dimensional Lattice Model of Protein Folding.
19. H. Zhang, C. F. Wong, T. Thacher, and H. Rabitz, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet., 23, 218 (1995). Parametric Sensitivity Analysis of Avian Pancreatic Polypeptide (APP).
20. B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus, J. Comput. Chem., 4, 187 (1983). CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, and Dynamics Calculations.
21. S. J. Weiner, P. A. Kollman, D. A. Case, U. C. Singh, C. Ghio, G. Alagona, S. Profeta Jr., and P. Weiner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106, 765 (1984). A New Force Field for Molecular Mechanical Simulation of Nucleic Acids and Proteins.
22. R. Susnow, R. B. Nachbar Jr., C. Schutt, and H. Rabitz, J. Phys. Chem., 95, 8585 (1991). Sensitivity of Molecular Structure to Intramolecular Potentials.
23. R. Susnow, R. B. Nachbar Jr., C. Schutt, and H. Rabitz, J. Phys. Chem., 95, 10662 (1991). Study of Amide Structure Through Sensitivity Analysis.
24. C. F. Wong, C. Zheng, J. Shen, J. A. McCammon, and P. G. Wolynes, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 3100 (1993). Cytochrome c: A Molecular Proving Ground for Computer Simulations.
25. P. H. Hünenberger, A. E. Mark, and W. F. van Gunsteren, J. Mol. Biol, 252, 492 (1995). Fluctuation and Cross-Correlation Analysis of Protein Motions Observed in Nanosecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
26. M. Born and K. Huang, Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices, Clarenden Press, Oxford, 1954.
27. M. Karplus and J. N. Kushick, Macromolecules, 14, 325 (1981). Method for Estimating the Configurational Entropy of Macromolecules.
28. R. M. Levy, M. Karplus, J. Kushick, and D. Perahia, Macromolecules, 17, 1370 (1984). Evaluation of the Configurational Entropy for Proteins: Application to Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an α-Helix.
29. C. F. Wong and H. Rabitz, J. Phys. Chem., 95, 9628 (1991). Sensitivity Analysis and Principal Component Analysis in Free Energy Calculations.
30. H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, and J. Hermans, in Intermolecular Forces, B. Pullman, Ed., Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981, pp. 331ff.
31. W. L. Jorgensen, J. Chandrasekhar, J. D. Madura, R. W. Impey, and M. L. Klein, J. Chem. Phys., 79, 926 (1983). Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water.
32. M. Sprik and M. L. Klein, J. Chem. Phys., 89, 7556 (1988). A Polarizable Model for Water Using Distributed Charge Sites.
33. J. W. Halley, J. R. Rustad, and A. Rahman, J. Chem. Phys., 98, 4110 (1993). A Polarizable, Dissociating Molecular Dynamics Model for Liquid Water.
34. D. N. Bernardo, Y. Ding, and K. Krogh-Jespersen, J. Phys. Chem., 98, 4180 (1994). An Anisotropic Polarizable Water Model: Incorporation of All-Atom Polarizabilities into Molecular Mechanics Force Fields.
35. R. D. Mountain, J. Chem. Phys., 103, 3084 (1995). Comparison of a Fixed-Charge and a Polarizable Water Model.
36. I. M. Svishchev, P. G. Kusalik, and R. J. Boyd, J. Chem. Phys., 105, 4742 (1996). Polarizable Point-Charge Model for Water: Results Under Normal and Extreme Conditions.
37. A. A. Chialvo and P. T. Cummings, J. Chem. Phys., 105, 8274 (1996). Engineering a Simple Polarizable Model for the Molecular Simulation of Water Applicable over Wide Ranges of State Conditions.
38. S. Zhu, S. Yao, J. Zhu, S. Singh, and G. W. Robinson, J. Phys. Chem., 95, 6211 (1991). A Flexible/Polarizable Simple Point Charge Water Model.
39. S.-b. Zhu, S. Singh, and G. W. Robinson, J. Chem. Phys., 95, 2791 (1991). A New Flexible/Polarizable Water Model.
40. S.-b. Zhu and C. F. Wong, J. Phys. Chem., 98, 4695 (1994). Sensitivity Analysis of a Polarizable Water Model.
41. S.-b. Zhu and C. F. Wong, J. Chem. Phys., 99, 9047 (1993). Sensitivity Analysis of Distribution Functions of Liquid Water.
42. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.
43. W. Yu, C. F. Wong, and J. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 15280 (1996). Brownian Dynamics Simulations of Polyalanine in Salt Solutions.
44. S. Huston and P. J. Rossky, J. Phys. Chem., 93, 7888 (1989). Free Energies of Association for the Sodium-Dimethyl Phosphate Ion Pair in Aqueous Solution.
45. J. S. Bader and D. Chandler, J. Phys. Chem., 96, 6423 (1992). Computer Simulation Study of the Mean Forces Between Ferrous and Ferric Ions in Water.
46. H. Schreiber and O. Steinhauser, Biochemistry, 31, 5856 (1992). Cutoff Size Does Strongly Influence Molecular Dynamics Results on Solvated Polypeptides.
47. G. K. Ackers and F. R. Smith, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 54, 597 (1985). Effects of Site-Specific Amino Acid Modification on Protein Interactions and Biological Function.
48. S. M. Green and D. Shortle, Biochemistry, 32, 10131 (1993). Patterns of Nonadditivity Between Pairs of Stability Mutations in Staphylococcal Nuclease.
49. V. J. LiCata and G. K. Ackers, Biochemistry, 34, 3133 (1995). Long-Range, Small Magnitude Nonadditivity of Mutational Effects in Proteins.
50. A. R. Fersht, A. Matouschek, and L. Serrano, J. Mol. Biol., 224, 771 (1992). The Folding of an Enzyme. I. Theory of Protein Engineering Analysis of Stability and Pathway of Protein Folding.
51. P. R. Gerber, A. E. Mark, and W. F. van Gunsteren, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 7, 305 (1993). An Approximate But Efficient Method to Calculate Free Energy Trends by Computer Simulation: Application to Dihydrofolate Reductase-Inhibitor Complexes.
52. P. Cieplak, D. A. Pearlman, and P. A. Kollman, J. Chem. Phys., 101, 627 (1994). Walking on the Free Energy Hypersurface of the 18-Crown-6 Ion System Using Free Energy Derivatives.
53. P. Cieplak and P. A. Kollman, J. Mol. Recognit., 9, 103 (1996). A Technique to Study Molecular Recognition in Drug Design: Preliminary Application of Free Energy Derivatives to Inhibition of a Malarial Cysteme Protease.
54. R. M. Levy, M. Belhadj, and D. B. Kitchen, J. Chem. Phys., 95, 3627 (1991). Gaussian Fluctuation Formula for Electrostatic Free-Energy Changes in Solution.
55. as of Ionizable Residues in Proteins: An Explicit Solvent Calculation for Lysozyme.
56. T. Simonson, C. F. Wong, and A. T. Brünger, J. Phys. Chem. A, 101, 1935 (1997). Classical and Quantum Simulations of Tryptophan in Solution.
57. R. W. Zwanzig, J. Chem. Phys., 22, 1420 (1954). High-Temperature Equation of State by Perturbation Method. I. Nonpolar Gases.
58. J. Åqvist, C. Medina, and J.-E. Samuelsson, Protein Eng., 7, 385 (1994). A New Method for Predicting Binding Affinity in Computer-Aided Drug Design.
59. A. Warshel and S. T. Russell, Q. Rev. Biophys., 17, 283 (1984). Calculations of Electrostatic Interactions in Biological Systems and in Solutions.
60. B. Roux, H.-a. Yu, and M. Karplus, J. Phys. Chem., 94, 4683 (1990). Molecular Basis for the Born Model of Ion Solvation.
61. H. A. Carlson and W. L. Jorgensen, J. Phys. Chem., 99, 10667 (1995). An Extended Linear Response Method for Determining Free Energies of Hydration.
62. M. D. Paulsen and R. L. Ornstein, Protein Eng., 9, 567 (1996). Binding Free Energy Calculations for P450cam-Substrate Complexes.
63. A. Amadei, A. B. M. Linssen, and H. J. C. Berendsen, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet., 17, 412 (1993). Essential Dynamics of Proteins.
64. D. M. F. van Aalten and A. Amadei, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet., 22, 45 (1995). The Essential Dynamics of Thermolysin: Confirmation of the Hinge-Bending Motion and Comparison of Simulations in Vacuum and Water.
65. R. M. Scheek, N. A. J. Van Nuland, B. L. De Groot, A. B. M. Linssen, and A. Amadei, J. Biomol. NMR, 6, 106 (1995). Structure from NMR and Molecular Dynamics: Distance Restraining Inhibits Motion in Essential Subspace.
66. D. van der Spoel, B. L. de Groot, S. Hayward, H. J. C. Berendsen, and H. J. Vogel, Protein Sci., 5, 2044 (1996). Bending of the Calmodulin Central Helix: A Theoretical Study.
67. A. Garcia, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 2696 (1992). Large-Amplitude Nonlinear Motions in Proteins.
68. T. Ichiye and M. Karplus, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet., 11, 205 (1991). Collective Motions in Proteins: A Covariance Analysis of Atomic Fluctuations in Molecular Dynamics and Normal Mode Simulations.
69. A. Kitao, F. Hirata, and N. Gō, Chem. Phys., 158, 447 (1991). The Effects of Solvent on the Conformation and the Collective Motions of Protein: Normal Mode Analysis and Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Melittin in Water and in Vacuum.
70. S. Hayward, A. Kitao, F. Hirata, and N. Gō, J. mol. Biol., 234, 1207 (1993). Effect of Solvent on Collective Motions in Globular Proteins.
71. N. Kobayashi, T. Yamato, and N. Gō, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet., 28, 109 (1997). Mechanical Property of a TIM-Barrel Protein.
72. N. Gō, T. Noguti, and T. Nishikawa, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 80, 3696 (1983). Dynamics of a Small Globular Protein in Terms of Low-Frequency Vibrational Modes.
73. B. R. Brooks and M. Karplus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 80, 6571 (1983). Harmonic Dynamics of Proteins: Normal Modes and Fluctuations in Bovine Pancreatic Trypsin Inhibitor.
74. M. Levitt, C. Sander, and P. S. Stern, J. Mol. Biol., 181, 423 (1985). Protein Normal-Mode Dynamics: Trypsin Inhibitor, Crambin, Ribonuclease and Lysozyme.
75. T. Simonson and D. Perahia, Biophys. J., 61, 410 (1992). Normal Modes of Symmetric Protein Assemblies: Application to the Tobacco Mosaic Virus Protein Disk.
76. R. C. Wade, Trans. Biochem. Soc., 24, 254 (1996). Brownian Dynamics Simulations of Enzyme-Substrate Encounter.
77. S. H. Northrup, S. A. Allison, and J. A. McCammon, J. Chem. Phys., 80, 1517 (1984). Brownian Dynamics Simulation of Diffusion-Influenced Biomolecular Reactions.
78. S. H. Northrup, J. O. Boles, and J. C. L. Reynolds, Science, 241, 67 (1988). Brownian Dynamics of Cytochrome c and Cytochrome c Peroxidase Association.
79. R. C. Wade, M. E. Davis, and B. A. Luty, Biophys. J., 64, 9 (1993). Gating of the Active Site of Triose Phosphate Isomerase: Brownian Dynamics Simulations of Flexible Peptide Loops in the Enzyme.
80. W. L. Jorgensen and J. Tirado-Rives, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 1657 (1988). The OPLS Potential Functions for Proteins. Energy Minimizations for Crystals of Cyclic Peptides and Crambin.
81. C. I. Bayly, P. Cieplak, W. D. Cornell, and P. A. Kollman, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 10269 (1993). A Well-Behaved Electrostatic Potential Based Method Using Charge Restraints for Deriving Atomic Charges: The RESP Model.
82. F. A. Momany, J. Phys. Chem., 82, 592 (1978). Determination of Partial Atomic Charges from Ab Initio Molecular Electrostatic Potentials. Application to Formamide, Methanol, and Formic Acid.
83. S. R. Cox and D. E. Williams, J. Comput. Chem., 2, 304 (1981). Representation of the Molecular Electrostatic Potential by a Net Atomic Charge Model.
84. U. C. Singh and P. A. Kollman, J. Comput. Chem., 5, 129 (1984). An Approach to Computing Electrostatic Charges for Molecules.
85. C. F. Wong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 3208 (1991). Systematic Sensitivity Analyses in Free Energy Perturbation Calculations.