Interaction Games: Using Familiar Concepts in User-Interface Design

Journal of Visual Languages and Computing

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 509-521

  Fach, Peter W ^a  

^a RWG GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003650767     PISSN: 1045926X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jvlc.1999.0135     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Card S. K., Moran T. P., Newell A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. 1983;Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
2. Pane S. J., Green T. R. G. Task-action-grammars: a model of the mental representation of task languages. Human-Computer Interaction. 2:1986;93-133.
3. Wilson S., Johnson P., Kelly C., Cunningham J., Markopoulos P. Beyond hacking: a model-based approach to user interface design. HCI'93 Conference Proceedings. 1993;University Press, Cambridge. p. 217-231.
4. Schlungbaum E., Elwert T. TADEUS - a model-based approach to the development of Interactive Software Systems. Rostocker Informatik-Berichte. 17:1995;93-104.
5. Puerta A. R. A model-based interface development environment. IEEE Software. 14:1997;40-44.
6. Bürkle U., Gryczan G., Züllighoven H. Object-oriented system development in a banking project: methodology, experience, and conclusions. Human-Computer Interaction. 10:1995;293-336.
7. Janssen C., Weisbecker A., Ziegler J. Generating user interfaces from data models and dialogue net specifications. Ashlund S., Mullet K., Henderson A., Hollnagel E., White E. CHI'93 Conference Proceedings. 1993;418-423 ACM, New York.
8. Bodart F., Hennebert A.-M., Leheureux J.-M., Provot I., Sacre B., Vanderdonckt J. Towards a systematic building of software architectures: the TRIDENT methodological guide. Palanque P., Bastide R. Design, Specification, and Verification of Interactive Systems. 1995;262-278 Springer, Wien.
9. Lorenzen P. Logik und Agon. Lorenzen P., Lorenz K. Dialogische Logik. 1978;1-8 Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.
10. Jeremaes P. Formal analysis of co-operative problem solving dialogs: tools and techniques. Diaper D. INTERACT 90 Conference Proceedings. 1990;155-161 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
11. Hoepelman J., van Hoof T. Default and dogma. Krabbe E. C. W., Dalitz R. J., Smit P. A. Empirical logic and public debate. 1990;141-158.
12. Fach P. W., Bannert M., Kunkel K. From conflict to dialogue: on attack and defense in on-line assistance. Grechening T., Tscheligi M. Human Computer Interaction. Vienna Conference, VCHCI'93. 1993;103-113 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
13. Beun R.-J. Rules in dialogue. Brouwer-Janse M. D., Harrington T. L. Human-Machine Communication for Educational Systems Design. 1984;79-88 Springer, Berlin.
14. Fach P. W. Dialogspiele in der Mensch-Computer-Interaction: Eine Fallstudie am Beispiel von Online-Hilfen. 1997;Waxmann Verlag, Münster.
15. Machate J. Fokussierung im Dialog: Aspekte der Fokusintonation im Deutschen. 1996;Springer, Berlin.
16. Barth E. M., Krabbe E. C. W. From Axiom to Dialogue. 1982;de Gruyter, Berlin.
17. Paternò F., Mancici C., Meniconi S. ConcurTaskTrees: a diagrammatic notation for specifying task models. Howard S., Hammond J., Lindgaard G. Interact'97 Conference Proceedings. 1997;362-369 Chapman and Hall, London.
18. van der Veer G. C., Lenting B. F., Bergevoet B. A. J. GTA: groupware task analysis - modeling complexity. Acta Psychologica. 91:1996;297-322.
19. Bäumer D., Gryczan G., Knoll R., Lilienthal C., Riehle D., Züllighoven H. Framework development for large systems. Communications of the ACM. 40:1997;52-95.
20. Hartson R., Gray P. D. Temporal aspects of tasks in the user action notation. Human-Computer Interaction. 7:1992;1-45.