Motor behavior

Introduction to Exercise Science

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 334-358

  Guadagnol, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003386191     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Guthrie ER. The psychology of learning. New York: Harper & Row, 1952.
2. Hick WE. On the rate of gain of information. Q J Exper Psychol 1952;4:11-26.
3. Proctor RW, Reeve TG, eds. Stimulus-response compatibility: an integrated perspective. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990.
4. Klapp ST. Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In: HN Zelaznick, ed. Advances in motor learning and control. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1996:13-35.
5. Guadagnoli MA, Reeve TG. Movement complexity and foreperiod effects on response latencies for aimed movements. J Hum Movement Stud 1992;23:29-39.
6. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychol 1969;30:270-315.
7. Sanders AF. Issues and trends in the debate on discrete vs. continuous processing of information. Acta Psychol 1990;74:123-167.
8. Atkinson RC, Shiffrin RM. The control of short-term memory. Sci Am 1971;225:82-90.
9. Baddley AD, Hitch G. Working memory. In: GH Bower, ed. Psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1974:47-89.
10. Miller GA The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 1956;63:81-97.
11. Guadagnoli MA, Dornier LA, Tandy R. Optimal length of summary knowledge of results: the influence of task related experience and complexity. J Exer Sport Psychol 1996;67:239-248.
12. Guadagnoli MA, Holcomb WR, Weber T. The relationship between contextual interference effects and performer experience on the learning of a putting task. J Hum Movement Stud 1999;37:19-36.
13. Shapiro DC, Schmidt RA. The schema theory: recent evidence and developmental implications. In: JAS Kelso, JE Clark, eds. The development of movement control and coordination. New York: Wiley, 1982:113-150.
14. Battig WF. The flexibility of human memory. In: LS Cermak, FIM Craik, eds. Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1979:24-33.
15. Shea CH, Kohl RM, Indermil C. Contextual interference: contributions of practice. Acta Psychol 1990;73:145-157.
16. Shea CH, Kohl RM. Specificity and variability of practice. Res Q Exer Sport 1990;61:169-177.
17. Kerr B, Booth R. Skill acquisition in elementary school children and Schema theory. In: DM Landers, RW Christina, eds. Psychology of motor behavior and sport. Vol. 2. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1977:395-404.
18. Lavery JJ. Retention of simple motor skills as a function of type of knowledge of results. Can J Psychol 1962;16:300-311.
19. Adams JA. A closed loop theory of motor learning. J Motor Behav 1971;3:111-149.
20. Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Rev 1975;82:225-260.
21. Schmidt RA, Lange C, Young DE. Optimizing summary knowledge of results. Hum Movement Sci 1990;9:325-348.
22. Keele SW, Posner MI. Processing visual feedback in rapid movement. J Exper Psychol 1968;77:155-158.
23. Henry FM, Rogers DE. Increased response latency for complicated movements and a "memory drum" theory of neuromotor reaction. Res Q 1960;31:448-458.
24. Haywood KM. Life-span and motor development. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1993.
25. Gabbard CG. Lifelong motor development. 2nd ed. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark, 1996.
26. Shirley MM. The first two years: a study of twenty-five babies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1931.
27. Heath GW, Hagberg JM, Ehsani AA, Holloszy JO. A physiological comparison of young and older endurance athletes. J Appl Physiol 1981;51:634-640.
28. Barinaga M. New imaging methods provide a better view into the brain. Science 1997;27:1974-1976.
29. Guadagnoli MA, Lance C, Kohl R. The degree of relationships between tests of cognitive ability. Under review.
30. Schmidt RA, Bjork RA. New conceptualization of practice: common principles in three research paradigms suggest important new concepts for practice. Psychol Sci 1992;4:207-217.
31. Fitts PM, Posner MI. Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1967.
32. Magill RA. Motor learning: concepts and applications. 4th ed. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark, 1993.
33. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1999.
34. Shea CH, Wright DL. An introduction to human movement: the sciences of physical education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1997.