Seasonal fluctuation of the Oomycetes in a polluted environment: Santigo River and affluents (Buenos Aires, Argentina);Variación estacional de los Oomycetes en un ambiente contaminado: Río Santiago y afluentes (Buenos Aires, Argentina)

Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 40-43

  Steciow, Mónica Mirta ^a  

^a Instituto de Botanica Carlos Spegazzini   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Aquatic ecosystems; Argentina; Oomycetes; Pollution; Seasonal fluctuation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003374039     PISSN: 11301406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Lund A. Studies on Danish freshwater Phycomycetes and notes on their occurrence particularly relative to the hydrogen ion concentration of the water. Mem Acad Roy Sci Danemark, Sect Sci 1934; 6:1-97
2. Wolf FT, Wolf FA. Aquatic Phycomycetes from the Everglades region of Florida. Lloydia 1941; 4:270-275.
3. Roberts RE. A study of the distribution of certain members of the Saprolegniales Trans Brit Mycot Soc 1963; 46:213-224.
4. Dayal R, Tandon RN. Ecological studies of some aquatic Phycomycetes II. Fungi in relation to chemical factors of the water. Hydrobiol 1953; 22:324-330.
5. Harvey JV. Relationship of aquatic fungi to water pollution Sewage Ind. Wastes 1952, 24:1159-1164
6. Suzuki S. Distribution of aquatic Phycomycetes in a river polluted by municipal wastes. J Waterw Sewer Assoc (Tokyo) 1960;35:51-54
7. Emerson R, Natvig DO. Adaptation of fungi to stagnant waters. En . Wickiow DT, Caroll QC. The fungal community: its organization and role in the ecosystem. Marcel Dekker, New York. 1981:109-128.
8. Cooke WB. Fungal populations in relation to pollution of The Bear River, Idaho-Utah. Utah Academy Proceedings 1967; 44:298-315
9. Steciow MM. Abundancia y frecuencia retativa de los Oomycetes en Rio Santiago y afluentes (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Rev Gayana Bot 1997; 54:39-52.
10. Khulbe RD. Distribution of aquatic fungi in relation to some ecological factors. Geobios 1981; 8.214-216.
11. Bhargava KS. Physiological studies on some members of the family Saprolegniaceae. II Sulphur and posphorous requirements. Proc Indian Acad Sci 1945; 21 B:344-349.
12. Bhargava KS. Physiological studies on some members of the family Saprolegniaceae. III. Nitrogen requirements. J Indian Bot Soc 1945; 24:67-72
13. Reischer HS Growth of Saprolegniaceae in sinthetic media. III. Nitrogen requirements and the role of Kreps cycle acids. Mycologia 1951; 43:319-328.
14. Dayal R. Nitrogen requirements of some members of the family Saprolegniaceae. Proc Nat Acad Sci India 1961; 31 B:332-336.
15. Dayal R. Sulphur requirements of some members of the family Saprolegniaceae. Proc Nat Acad Sci India 1961; 31 B:399-401.
16. Hughes GC. Seasonal periodicity of the Saprolegniaceae in the South-Eastern United States. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 1962; 45:519-531.
17. Khulbe RD, Bhargava KS. Frequency of water molds in relation to nitrate, sulphate and phosphate in some lakes of Nainital, India. Trop Ecol 1983, 24 180-187.
18. Whiffen AJ. Nutritional studies of representatives of five genera in the Saprolegniaceae. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 1945;61:114-123.
19. Hallett IC, Dick MW. Seasonal and diurnal fluctuations of Oomycete propagule numbers in the free water of a freshwater lake. J Ecol 1981; 69:671-692
20. Dick MW. Patterns of phenology in populations of zoosponc fungi. En: Carroll GC, Wicklow DT. The fungal community. Its organization and role in the ecosystems 2nd ed Mycology Series, vol 9. Marcel Dekker. Inc New York. 1992.355-382.
21. Willoughby LG, Collins VG. A study of the distribution of fungal spores and bacteria in Blelham Tarn and its associated streams. Nova Hedwigia 1966; 12:150-171
22. Cooke WB. Fungi in and near streams carrying acid mine drainage. Ohio J Sci 1976, 76:231-240.
23. Cooke WB Aquatic fungi in some Ohio streams. Ohio J Sci 1960; 60:144-149