Audit, assessment and academic autonomy

Higher Education Quarterly

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 178-192

  Alderman, Geoffrey ^a  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003328960     PISSN: 09515224     EISSN: 14682273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.1996.tb01700.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Alderman, G. (1995), ‘Superior knowledge comes with age,’ Independent, 12 Oct., p. 15.
2. Committee of Vice-Chancellors & Principals (1995), Developing Quality Assurance in partnership with the institutions of higher education (London, July).
3. de Vries, P. (1996), ‘Could Criteria used in Quality Assessments be Classified as Academic Standards?’ (also in this issue). I am grateful to Dr. de Vries for furnishing me with a copy of this paper.
4. Higher Education Funding Council for England (1994), The Quality Assessment Method from April 1995 (Bristol, December).
5. Higher Education Funding Council for England (1995a), Review of Higher Education (Bristol).
6. Higher Education Funding Council for England (1995b), Developing Quality Assurance in Partnership with the Institutions of Higher Education (Bristol, June).
7. Higher Education Quality Council (1994), Learning from Audit (London, 1994).
8. Higher Education Quality Council (1995a), Audit Method and Procedures (London, 1995).
9. Higher Education Quality Council (1995b), The Mission of the HEQC (London, March).
10. Johnson, N. (1994), ‘Dons in Decline’, Twentieth Century British History, pp. 370–85.
11. Wagner, L. (1995) ‘Change and Continuity in Higher Education’, Inaugural Lecture by Professor Leslie Wagner, Vice-Chancellor, Leeds Metropolitan University (12 Jan.); I am grateful to Professor Wagner for providing me with a copy of this lecture.