New findings on the contempt expression

Cognition and Emotion

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 379-408

  Alvarado, Nancy ^a,c   Jameson, Kimberly ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003197667     PISSN: 02699931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/026999396380196     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alvarado, N. (1993). The labeling of emotion. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Irvine. University Microfilms International. Ann Arbor, MI. Microfilm no. 9323902.
2. Alvarado, N. (submitted). Congruence of meaning between facial expressions of emotion and selected emotion terms. Unpublished manuscript.
3. Batchelder, W.H., & Bershad, N.J. (1979). The statistical analysis of a Thurstonian model for rating chess players. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 39-60.
4. Batchelder, W.H., & Romney, A.K. (1988). Test theory without an answer key. Psychometrika, 53, 71-92.
5. Batchelder, W.H., & Romney, A.K. (1989). New results in test theory without an answer key. In E. Roskam (Ed.), Mathematical psychology in progress (pp. 229-248). Heidelberg: Springer.
6. Borgatti, S. (1993). Reference manual: Anthropac 4.02. Columbia, SC: Analytic Systems Inc.
7. Burton, M.L., & Nerlove, S.B. (1976). Balanced designs for triad tests: Two examples from English. Social Science Research, 5, 247-267.
8. Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell's mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin, 155, 268-287.
9. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
10. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1978). The facial action coding system. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
11. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1986). A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 10, 159-168.
12. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1988). Who knows what about contempt: A reply to Izard and Haynes. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 17-22.
13. Ekman, P., & Heider, K. (1988). The universality of a contempt expression: A replication. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 303-308.
14. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Matsumoto, D. (1991a). Contradictions in the study of contempt: What's it all about? Reply to Russell. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 293-296.
15. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Matsumoto, D. (1991b). Confusions about context in the judgement of facial expression: A reply to "The contempt expression and the relativity thesis". Motivation and Emotion, 15, 169-176.
16. Fridlund, A. (1994). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Goodman, L., & Kruskal, W. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 733-764.
18. Green, P., Carmone, Jr. F., & Smith, S. (1989). Multidimensional scaling: Concepts and applications. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19. Izard, C. (1994). Innate and universal facial expressions: Evidence from developmental and cross-cultural research. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 288-299.
20. Izard, C., & Haynes, O. (1988). On the form and universality of the contempt expression: A challenge to Ekman and Friesen's claim of discovery. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 1-16.
21. Jameson, K. A. (in press). Numerical scaling techniques for evaluating generative models of orthographies. Acta Psychologica, 93.
22. Matsumoto, D. (1992). More evidence for the universality of a contempt expression. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 363-368.
23. Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1988). Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press..
24. Osgood, C. (1966). Dimensionality of the semantic space for communication via facial expressions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 7, 1-30.
25. Roberts, J., & Wedell, D. (1994). Context effects on similarity judgments of multidimensional stimuli: Inferring the structure of the emotion space. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-38.
26. Rosenberg, E., & Ekman, P. (1995). Conceptual and methodological issues in the judgment of facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 19 (2), 111-138.
27. Russell, J. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.
28. Russell, J. (1991a). The contempt expression and the relativity thesis. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 149-168.
29. Russell, J. (1991b). Negative results on a reported facial expression of contempt. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 281-291.
30. Russell, J. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102-141.
31. Russell, J., & Bullock, M. (1986). Fuzzy concepts and the perception of emotion in facial expressions. Social Cognition, 4, 309-341.
32. Russell, J., & Fehr, B. (1987). Relativity in the perception of emotion in facial expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 223-237.
33. Russell, J., Lewicka, M., & Niit, T. (1989). A cross-cultural study of a circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 848-856.
34. Schlosberg, H. (1954). Three dimensions of emotion. Psychological Review, 61, 81-88.
35. Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061-1086.
36. Shepard, R. (1974). Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects. Psychometrika, 39, 373-421.
37. Thurstone, L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.
38. Weller, S., & Romney, A. (1988). Systematic data collection. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.