Reconciling the design of CDM with inborn paradox of additionality concept

Climate Policy

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 75-83

  Sugiyama, Taishi ^a   Michaelowa, Axel ^b  

^a CENTRAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY   (Japan)

^b 1 6 1 Otemachi Chiyodaku 100   (Japan)

Author keywords

Clean development mechanism; Greenhouse gas emission; Grubb's paradox

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003134201     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1469-3062(00)00005-X     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baumert, K., 1999. Understanding additionality. In: Goldemberg, J., Reid, W. (Eds.), Promoting Development While Limiting Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Trends and Baselines. New York, pp. 135-143.
2. Bedi, C., 1994. No regrets under joint implementation? In: Ghosh, P., Puri, J. (Eds.), Joint Implementation of Climate Change Commitments. New Delhi, pp. 103-107.
3. Chayes, A., Chayes, A.H., 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
4. Chomitz, K., 1998. Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Through DSM Projects: Lessons Learned from DSM Evaluation in the United States. World Bank, Washington.
5. DeSombre, E.R., Kaufmann, J., 1996. The montreal protocol multilateral fund: partial success story. In: Keohane, R.O., Levy, M.A. (Eds.), Institutions for Environemntal Aid. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Fankhauser, S., 1999. The GEF Incremental Cost Framework - Experience from Climate Change Projects, London.
7. Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C., Brack, D., 1998. The Kyoto Protocol. Earthscan, London.
8. International Energy Agency, 1997. Activities Implemented Jointly - Partnerships for Climate and Development, Paris.
9. ILO, 2000. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/norm/sources/glossry.htm# , Glossary in ILO homepage. Accessed August 2000.
10. Imai, H., Akita, J., Niizawa, H., Sawa, T., 1999. Some Consistency and Incentive Issues in CDM, Kyoto.
11. Ishii, A., 2000. Implementation of the protocols of the conventiion on long range transboundary air pollution. In: World Enviromental Policies, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Japan, pp. 82-89 (in Japanese).
12. Levy, M., 1995. European acid rain: the power of tote-board diplomacy. In: Haas, P., Keohane, R.O., Levy, M.A. (Eds.), Institutions for the Earth: Source of Effective International Environmental Protection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Meyers, S., 1999. Additionality of emissions reductions from clean development mechanism projects: issues and options for project-level assessment. LBNL-43704, Berkeley.
14. Michaelowa A. Joint implementation - the baseline issue. Global Environmental Change. 8(1):1998;81-92.
15. Nadel, S., Reid, M., Wolcott, D. (Eds.), 1992. Regulatory Incentives for Demand-Side Management. American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Washington, DC, Berkeley.
16. Philibert, C., 1999. Think Piece on the Additionality under the CDM, Paris.
17. Rentz H. Joint implementation and the question of additionality - a proposal for a pragmatic approach to identify possible joint implementation projects. Energy Policy. 4:1998;275-279.
18. Rolfe, C., 1998. Additionality: What is it? Does it Matter? Vancouver.
19. Sugiyama, T., Michaelowa, A., 2000. What must COP6 decide?: Extended flexibility backed by transparency and responsibility. CRIEPI Working Paper Y99911, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry.
20. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1997. Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. FCCC/CP/L.7/Add.1, Kyoto.
21. Varming, S., Larsen, P., Christensen, B., 1998. Possibilities of AIJ: two Polish cases. In: Riemer, P., Smith, A., Thambimuthu, K. (Eds.), Greenhouse Gas Mitigation. Technologies for Activities Implemented Jointly. Amsterdam, pp. 529-534.
22. Victor, D., 1998. The operation and effectiveness of the montreal protocol's non-compliance procedure. In: Victor, D., Raustiala, K., Skolnikoff, E.B. (Eds.), The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Wettestad, J., 1998. Participation in NOx policy-making and implementation in The Netherlands, UK, and Norway: different approaches but similar results? In: Victor, D., Raustiala, K., Skolnikoff, E.B. (Eds.), The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.