Creation of variability by mutation and tissue culture for improving plants

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 447, Issue , 1997, Pages 69-77

  Jain, S Mohan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Begonia; Brassica; Fragaria; Phytopthora cactorum; Saintpaulia

Indexed keywords

BEGONIA; BEGONIA ELATIOR; BRASSICA; BRASSICA NAPUS; FRAGARIA; FRAGARIA X ANANASSA; SAINTPAULIA; SAINTPAULIA IONANTHA;

EID: 0003121705     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Arnholdt-Schmitt, B., S. Herterich and K. H. Neumann, 1995. Physiological aspects of genome variability in tissue culture. I. Growth phase-dependent differentiated DNA methylation of the carrot genome (Daucus carota L.) during primary culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 809-815.
2. Arnholdt-Schmitt, B., 1995. Physiological aspects of genome variability in tissue culture. II. Growth phase-dependent quantitative variability of repetitive BstNl fragments of primary cultures of Daucus carota. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 816-823.
3. Bauman, H and G. J. De Klerk, 1995. Somaclonal variation in biotechnology of ornamental plants. In: Geneve, R., Preece, J. and S. Merkle (eds.), Biotechnology of ornamental plants, CAB International, Wallingford, UK (in press).
4. Buiatti, M, F. Gimelli, R. Venturo, P. Bogani and T. Piconi, 1986. Interclonal variability induced by in vitro and in vivo propagation in a vegetatively propagated plant, the carnation. In: J. Semal (ed.), Somaclonal variations and crop improvement, 251-256. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.
5. Damiani, F., M. Pezzotti and S. Arcioni, 1990. Somaclonal variation in Lotus corniculatus L. in relation to plant breeding purposes. Euphytica 46: 35-41.
6. De Klerk, G. J., T. J. Brugge and H. Bouman, 1990. An assay to measure the extent of variation in micropropagated plants of Begonia x hiemalis. Acta Bot. Neerl. 39: 145-151.
7. Deverno, L. L., 1995. An evaluation of somaclonal variation during somatic embryogenesis. In: Jain, S. M., P. K. Gupta and R. J. Newton (eds.), Somatic embryogenesis in woody plants, Vol 1, 361-377. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
8. Gavazzi, G., C. Tonelli, G. Todesco, E. Arreghini, F. Raffalid, F. Vecchio, G. Barbuzzi, M. G. Biasini and F. Sala, 1987. Somaclonal variation versus chemically induced mutagenesis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 733-738.
9. Jain, S. M., 1993. Somaclonal variation in Begonia x elatior and Saintpaulia ionantha plants. Sci. Hort. 54: 221-231.
10. Jain, S. M. and R. J. Newton, 1989. Evaluation of protoclonal variation versus chemically induced mutagenesis in Brassica napus. Curr. Sci. 58: 176-180.
11. Jain, S. M. and E. Pehu, 1992. The prospects of tissue culture and genetic engineering in strawbery improvement. Acta Agric. Scand., Sec B, Soil and Plant Sci., 42: 133-139.
12. Lorz, H. and R. Scowcroft, 1983. Variability among plants and their progeny regenerated from protplasts of Su/su heterozygotes of Nicotiana tabacum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 66: 67-75.
13. Maluszynski, M., B. S. Ahloowalia and B. Sigurbjornsson, 1995. Application of in vivo and in vitro mutation techniques for crop improvement. Euphytica 85: 303-315.
14. McCoy, T. J., R. L. Phillips and H. W. Rines, 1982. Cytogenetic analysis of plants regenerated from oat (Avena sativa) tissue culture: high frequency of partial chromosome loss. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 24: 34-50.
15. Micke, A., B. Donini and M. Maluszynski, 1990. Induced mutations for crop improvement. Mutat. Breed. Rev. 7: 1-41.
16. Murashige, T. and F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497.
17. Kaeppler, S. M. and R. L. Phillips, 1993. DNA methylation and tissue culture-induced variation in plants. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 29: 125-130.
18. Karp, A., 1991. On the current understanding of somaclonal varia-tion. In: Miflin, B. J. (ed.), Oxford Surveys of Plant Molecular and Cell Biology, Vol. 7., Oxford University Press: 1-58.
19. Karp, A., 1995. Somaclonal variation as a tool for crop improve-ment. Euphytica 85: 295-302.
20. Khalid, N., M. R. Davey and J. B. Power, 1989. An assessment of somaclonal variation in Chrysanthemum morifolium: the generation of plants of potential commercial value. Sci. Hort. 38: 287-294.
21. Radin, D. N. and P. S. Carlson, 1978. Herbicide-tolerant tobacco muta-nts selected in situ and recovered via regeneration from cell culture. Genet. Res. 32: 85-89.
22. Walbot, V., 1985. On the life stratgies of plants and animals. Trends Genet. 1: 165-169.