Gender Differences in Supervisory Authority: Variation among Advanced Industrialized Democracies

Social Science Research

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 23-49

  Rosenfeld, Rachel A ^a   Van Buren, Mark E ^b   Kalleberg, Arne L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003118611     PISSN: 0049089X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ssre.1997.0609     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bergmann B. R. The Economic Emergence of Women. 1986;Basic Books, New York.
2. Berk R. A. An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review. 48:1983;386-398.
3. Blossfeld H.-P. The New Role of Women: Family Formation in Modern Societies. 1995;Westview, Boulder.
4. Boyd M., Mulvihill M. A., Myles J. Gender, power, and postindustrialism. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. 28:1991;407-436.
5. Brüderl, J. Preisendörfer, P. Ziegler, R. 1991, Upward mobility in organizations: The effects of hierarchy and opportunity structure, Institute of Sociology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
6. Bryk A. S., Raudenbush S. W. Hierarchical Linear Models. 1992;Sage, Newbury Park.
7. Burstein P. Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity in the United States since the New Deal. 1985;Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
8. Cameron D. Social democracy, corporatism, labour quiescence and the representation of economic interest in advanced capitalist society. Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. 1984;Oxford Univ. Press, New York. p. 143-178.
9. Castles F. Social protection by other means: Australia's strategy of coping with external vulnerability. Castles Francis. The Comparative History of Public Policy. 1989;16-55 Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
10. Chafetz J. S. Sex and Advantage: A Comparative, Macro-Structural Theory of Sex Stratification. 1984;Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa.
11. Chafetz J. S., Dworkin A. G. Female Revolt: Women's Movements in World and Historical Perspective. 1986;Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa.
12. Chafetz J. S., Dworkin A. G. Action and reaction: An integrated, comparative perspective on feminist and antifeminist movements. Kohn Melvin. Cross-national Research in Sociology. 1989;329-350 Sage, Newbury Park.
13. Charles M. Cross-national variation in occupational segregation. American Sociological Review. 57:1992;483-502.
14. Dahlerup D. Is the new women's movement dead? Decline or change of the Danish movement. Dahlerup Drude. The New Women's Movement: Feminism and Political Power in Europe and the USA. 1986;217-244 Sage, London.
15. DiPrete T. A. The Bureaucratic Labor Market: The Case of the Federal Civil Service. 1989;Plenum, New York.
16. DiPrete T. A., Forristal J. D. Multilevel models: Method and substance. Annual Review of Sociology. 20:1994;331-357.
17. Eisenstein, H. 1995, The Australian femocratic experiment: A feminist case for bureaucracy, in, Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women's Movement, Myra, Marx, FerreePatricia, Yancy, Martin, 69, 83, Temple Univ. Press, Philadelphia.
18. England P. Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. 1992;Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
19. Esping-Andersen G. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. 1990;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
20. Goldstein H. Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. 1987;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
21. Goldstein H. Improved estimation for logit and loglinear multilevel models. Multilevel Modelling Newsletter. 6:1994.
22. Gorman, E. 1996, Can motivational differences help to explain the marriage gap in men's earnings? Evidence from men's job-shifting patterns, Department of Sociology, Harvard University.
23. Gregory R. G., Anstie R., Daly A., Ho V. Women's pay in Australia, Great Britain, and the United States: The role of laws, regulations, and human capital. Michael Robert T., Hartmann Heidi, O'Farrell Brigid. Pay Equity: Empirical Inquiries. 1989;222-242 National Academy, Washington.
24. Haas L. Equal Parenthood and Social Policy: A Study of Parental Leave in Sweden. 1992;State Univ. of New York Press, Albany.
25. Hachen D. S. Jr. Gender differences in job mobility rates in the United States. Social Science Research. 17:1988;93-116.
26. Ilon L., Wright E. O. Comparative Project on Class Structure and Class Consciousness: User's Guide for Machine-Readable Data File. 1989;Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
27. Ishida, H. 1994, Gender inequality in authority and autonomy in the Japanese workplace: A cross-national comparison with the United States and Britain.
28. Jacobs J. A. Women's entry into management: Trends in earnings, authority and values among salaried managers. Administration Science Quarterly. 37:1992;282-301.
29. Kalleberg A. L. Comparative perspectives on work structures and inequality. Annual Review of Sociology. 14:1988;203-225.
30. Kalleberg, A. L. Rosenfeld, R. A. 1991, Labor Market Segmentation and Gender Stratification [machine readable data set and codebook], Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
31. Kilbourne, B. S. 1991, Occupational Skills, Gender, and Earnings, University of Texas-Dallas.
32. Kolberg J. E. The gender dimension of the welfare state. Kolberg Jon E. The Welfare State as Employer. 1991;119-148 M. E. Sharp, Armonk.
33. Lehmbruch G. Concentration and the structure of corporatist networks. Goldthorpe John H. Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. 1984;60-80 Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
34. Lincoln J. R., Kalleberg A. L. Culture, Control, and Commitment. 1990;Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
35. Mason W. M., Wong G. Y., Entwisle B. Contextual analysis through the multilevel linear model. Leinhardt Samuel. Sociological Methodology 1983-84. 1983;72-103 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
36. McGuire G. M., Reskin B. F. Authority hierarchies at work: The impact of race and sex. Gender and Society. 7:1993;487-506.
37. MLn Release Note: Version 1.0a. 1995;University of LondonMultilevel Models Project, Institute of Education.
38. Rasbash J., Woodhouse G. MLn Command Reference. 1995;University of LondonInstitute of Education.
39. Reskin B. Bringing the men back in: Sex differentiation and the devaluation of women's work. Gender and Society. 2:1988;58-81.
40. Reskin B., Padavic I. Women and Men at Work. 1994;Pine Forge, Thousand Oaks.
41. Rodriguez, G. Goldman, N. 1993, An assessment of estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary responses.
42. Rosenfeld R. A. Job mobility and career processes. Annual Review of Sociology. 18:1992;39-61.
43. Rosenfeld R. A., Birkelund G. E. Women's part-time work: A cross-national comparison. European Sociological Review. 11:1995;111-134.
44. Rosenfeld R. A., Kalleberg A. L. A cross-national comparison of the gender gap in income. American Journal of Sociology. 96:1990;69-106.
45. Rosenfeld R., Kalleberg A. L. Gender inequality in the labor market: A cross-national perspective. Acta Sociologica. 34:1991;207-225.
46. Ruggie M. The State and Working Women. 1984;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
47. Skard T., Haavio-Mannila E. Equality between the sexes - myth or reality in Norden. Daedalus. 113:1984;141-167.
48. Sørensen, A. M. 1996, Gender stratification in industrial societies: Why have comparative studies not fulfilled their promise.
49. Stolzenberg R. M., Relles D. A. Theory testing in a world of constrained research design. Sociological Methods and Research. 18:1990;395-415.
50. Tomaskovic-Devey D. Gender and Racial Inequality at Work: The Sources and Consequences of Job Segregation. 1993;ILR, Ithaca.
51. Wilkinson L. Scatterplot matrices. SYGRAPH: The System for Graphics. 1990;SYSTAT, Evanston. p. 284-321.
52. Wolf W. C., Fligstein N. D. Sex and authority in the workplace: The causes of sexual inequality. American Sociological Review. 44:1979;235-252.
53. Wright E. O. The comparative project on class structure and class consciousness: An overview. Acta Sociologica. 32:1989;3-22.
54. Wright E. O., Baxter J., Birkelund G. E. The gender gap in workplace authority: A cross-national study. American Sociological Review. 60:1995;407-435.