Development of L2 intraword orthographic sensitivity and decoding skills

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 51-64

  Koda, Keiko ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003093822     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0026-7902.00005     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2. Barker, T. A., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (1992). The role of orthographic processing skills on five different reading tasks. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 346-345.
3. Berman, R. (1986). A crosslinguistic perspective: Morphology and syntax. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (2nd ed., pp. 429-447). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Blachman, B. A. (1991). Phonological awareness: Implications for prereading and early reading instruction. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processing in literacy (pp. 29-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Bowey, J. A., & Francis, J. (1991). Phonological analysis as a function of age and exposure to reading instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 91-121.
7. Bradley, L. (1988). Rhyme recognition and reading and spelling in young children. In R. L. Masland & M. W. Masland (Eds.), Pre-school prevention of reading failure (pp. 143-152). Parkton, MD: York Press.
8. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1991). Phonological skills before and after learning to read. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processing in literacy (pp. 37-45). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Bryant, P., MacLean, M., & Bradley, L. (1990). Rhyme, language, and children's reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 237-252.
10. Chilant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 55-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Duques, S. (1989). Grammatical deficiency in writing: An investigation of learning disabled college students. Reading and Writing, 2, 1-17.
12. Frost, R. (1994). Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading: Evidence from a deep and shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 116-129.
13. Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographic depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104-115.
14. Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Orthographic resources affect reading acquisition - If they are used. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 24-36.
15. Gleitman, L. R., & Rozin, P. (1978). The structure and acquisition of reading I: Relation between orthographies and the structure of language. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.), Towards a psychology of reading: The proceedings of the CUNY conference. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.
17. Gough, P. B. (1983). Context, form, and interaction. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 203-211). New York: Academic Press.
18. Hakuta, K. (1982). Interaction between particles and word order in the comprehension and production of simple sentences in Japanese children. Developmental Psychology, 18, 62-76.
19. Hatta, T. (1992). The effects of Kanji attributes on visual field differences: Examination with lexical decision, naming and semantic classification tasks. Neuropsychologia, 30, 361-371.
20. Henderson, L. (Ed.). (1984). Orthographies and reading: Perspective from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology and linguistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Henderson, L. (1985). Issues in the modeling of pronunciation assembly in normal reading. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 459-508). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Henderson, A. J., & Shores, R. E. (1982). How learning disabled students' failure to attend to suffixes affects their oral reading performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 178-182.
23. Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243-255.
24. Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). Reading in different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67-84). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
25. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Reading and the awareness of linguistic segments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201-212.
26. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1-33). International Academy of Research on Learning Disabilities Monograph Series. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
27. MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (Eds.). (1989). The Crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Massaro, D. W., Venezky, R. L., & Taylor, G. A. (1979). Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 107-124.
29. Mayzner, M. S., & Tresselt, M. E. (1965). Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1, 13-32.
30. Nakagawa, A. (1994). Visual and semantic processing in reading Kanji. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 864-875.
31. National Institute of Japanese Language. (1964). The development of language abilities in elementary school children: A six year follow-up study of the same children. Tokyo: Meiji Tosho Shuppan.
32. Patterson, K. E., & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an older interpretation. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 331-359). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Perfetti, C. A. (1986). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Perfetti, C. A. (1991). Representations and awareness in the acquisition of reading competence. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read (pp. 33-46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L. C., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283-319.
36. Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 24-33.
37. Rubin, H. (1991). Morphological knowledge and writing ability. In R. M. Joshi (Ed.), Written language disorders (pp. 43-69). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
38. Rusted, J. (1988). Orthographic effects for Chinese-English bilinguals in a picture-word interference task. Current Psychology: Research Reviews, 7, 207-220.
39. Segalowitz, N. S. (1986). Skilled reading in the second language. In J. Vaid (Ed.), Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neurological perspectives (pp. 3-19). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Segalowitz, N. S., Poulsen, C., & Komoda, M. (1991). Lower level components or reading skill in higher level bilinguals: Implications for reading instruction. AILA Review, 8, 15-30.
41. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
42. Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 1157-1249). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Slobin, D. I., & Bever, T. G. (1982). Children's use of canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229-265.
44. Stahl, S. A., & Murray, B. A. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 221-234.
45. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). The right and wrong place to look for cognitive locus of reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 154-177.
46. Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Changing models of reading and acquisition. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read (pp. 19-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness of kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 175-190.
48. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402-433.
49. Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Taft, M., & Zhu, X. P. (1995). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., & Peng, D.-L. (1995). Role of early presemantic phonological code in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 43-54.
53. Taylor, I. (1980). The Korean writing system: An alphabet? A syllabary? A logography? In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visual language (Vol. 2, pp. 67-82). New York: Plenum.
54. Taylor, I., & Olson, D. R. (1995). An introduction to reading the world's scripts. In I. Taylor & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 1-15). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
55. Taylor, I., & Park, K. (1995). Differential processing of content words and function words: Chinese characters vs. phonetic scripts. In I. Taylor & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 1-15). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
56. Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York: Academic Press.
57. Thompson, G. B., Cottrell, D. S., & Fletcher-Flinn, C. M. (1996). Sublexical orthographic-phonological relations early in the acquisition of reading: The knowledge sources account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 190-222.
58. Thorndike, E. L. (1942). The Teacher's Word Book of 20,000 Words. New York: Teacher's College.
59. Turvey, M. T., Feldman, L. B., & Lukatela, G. (1984). The Serbo-Croatian orthography constraints of the reader to a phonologically analytic strategy. In L. Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics (pp. 81-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649-667.
61. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading. Cognition, 36, 17-34.
62. Tzeng, O. J. L., & Wang, W. S. -Y. (1983). The first two R's: The way different languages reduce speech to script affects how visual information is processed in the brain. American Scientist, 71, 238-243.
63. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321-363.
64. Woodcock, R. W. (1973). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
65. Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159-177.
66. Yu, B., & Cao, H. (1994). Position and similarity effects in the cognition of components of Chinese characters. In Q. Jing, H. Zhang, & D. Peng (Eds.), Information processing of Chinese language (pp. 79-86). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing.
67. Zhang, S., & Perfetti, C. A. (1993). The tongue-twister effect in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 1-12.
68. Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1994). Words, morphemes, and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 393-422.