Distance education research and continuing professional education: Reframing questions for the emerging information infrastructure

Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-13

  Dillon, Connie L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult education; Continuing medical education (CME); Continuing professional education, distance education; Learning; Technology; Telecommunications

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003081659     PISSN: 08941912     EISSN: 1554558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chp.4750160102     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. McLuhan M. Understanding media. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
2. Postman N. Amusing ourselves to death: public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Penguin, 1985.
3. Postman N. Technopoloy: the surrender of culture to technology. New York: Knopf, 1992.
4. Esslin M. The age of television. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1982.
5. Keegan D. The foundations of distance education. London: Croom Helm, 1986.
6. Garrison DR, Shale D. Mapping the boundaries of distance education: problems in defining the field. Am J Distance Educ 1987; 1 (1): 7–13.
7. Holmberg B. Theory and practice of distance education. New York: Routledge, 1989.
8. Watkins BL. A quite radical idea: the invention and elaboration of collegiate correspondence study. In: Watkins BL, Wright SL, eds. The foundations of American distance education. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, 1991: 1–35.
9. Garrison DR. Understanding distance education. London: Routledge, 1989.
10. Moore MG, Thompson MM. The effects of distance learning: a summary of literature. Research monograph No. 2. University Park, PA: The American Center for Distance Education, Pennsylvania State University, 1990.
11. Dillon CL, Smith PL. A review of the literature of the learning benefit of video-based distance education systems. IBM, Corp. Contract #11203LK1, 1992.
12. Short J, Williams E, Christie B. The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons, 1976.
13. Kearney P, Plax T, Wendt-Wasco N. Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college classes. Communication Q 1985; 3 (1): 61–74.
14. Christophel D. The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Educ 1990; 39: 323–340.
15. Hackman MZ, Walker KB. Instructional communication in the televised classroom: the effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Educ 1990; 39 (3): 196–209.
16. Merriam SB, Caffarella RS. Learning in adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
17. Dillon CL, Walsh SM. Faculty: the neglected resource in distance education. Am J Distance Educ 1992; 6 (3): 5–21.
18. Lindquist J. Strategies for change. Santee, CA: Pacific Soundings Press, 1978.
19. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press, 1983.
20. Fox RD, Mazmanian PE, Putnam RW. Changing and learning in the lives of physicians. New York: Praeger, 1989.
21. Mason R, Kaye T. Toward a new paradigm for distance education. In: Harasim LM, ed. Online education: perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger, 1990: 15–27.
22. Dede C. Emerging technologies: impacts on distance learning. Ann Am Acad 1990; 514: 146–158.
23. Kiesler S, Siegel J, McGuire TW. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. Am Psychologist 1984; 39: 1123–1134.
24. Rosetti DK, Surynt TJ. Video teleconferencing and performance. J Business Communication 1985; 22 (4): 25–31.
25. Adrianson L, Hjelmquist E. Group process in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Behav Information Technology 1991; 10: 281–296.
26. Lea M, Spears R. Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation and group decision-making. Int J Man-Machine Studies 1991; 34: 283–301.
27. Wertsch JV. Vygotsky and the social formation of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.