Theory of type-II superconductors with finite London penetration depth

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2001, Pages

  Brandt, Ernst Helmut ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDUCTOR; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; FILM; GEOMETRY; MAGNETISM; PHASE TRANSITION; QUANTUM MECHANICS; QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0003071752     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.024505     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. A A. Abrikosov, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 32, 1442 (1957) [Sov. Phys. JETP5, 1174 (1957)].
2. J R. Clem, Phys. Rev. B43, 7837 (1991).
3. E H. Brandt, Rep. Prog. Phys.58, 1465 (1995).
4. E H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B49, 9024 (1994).
5. E H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B50, 4034 (1994);
6. E H. BrandtPhys. Rev. Lett.71, 2821 (1993);
7. E H. BrandtPhys. Rev. B55, 14 513 (1997).
8. E H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B52, 15 442 (1995).
9. E H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B54, 4246 (1996).
10. (a) E H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B58, 6506 (1998);
11. Phys. Rev. BE H. Brandt(b) 58, 6523 (1998).
12. L. Prigozhin, J. Comput. Phys.144, 180 (1998).
13. E H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B59, 3369 (1999).
14. E. Zeldov, A I. Larkin, V B. Geshkenbein, M. Konczykowski, D. Majer, B. Khaykovich, V M. Vinokur, and H. Shtrikman, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 1428 (1994).
15. J. Pearl, Appl. Phys. Lett.5, 65 (1964).
16. J R. Clem, Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 1425 (1977).
17. E H. Brandt, Phys. Lett.79A, 207 (1980);
18. E H. BrandtJ. Low Temp. Phys.44, 33 (1981);
19. J. Low Temp. Phys.E H. Brandt44, 59 (1981).
20. A. Perez-Gonzales and J R. Clem, Phys. Rev. B43, 7792 (1991), and references therein and in Ref. 3.
21. A. Gurevich, Phys. Rev. B46, 3638 (1992).
22. E H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B50, 13 833 (1994).
23. Here this inverse kernel is derived from the dynamic London equation (4). An alternative derivation from the static London equation (formula presented) is given in Ref. 19.
24. E H. Brandt and G P. Mikitik, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 4164 (2000).
25. D. Yu. Vodolazov and I L. Maximov, Physica C349, 125 (2001).
26. P N. Mikheenko and Yu. E. Kuzovlev, Physica C204, 229 (1994).
27. W T. Norris, J. Phys. D3, 498 (1970).
28. E H. Brandt, M V. Indenbom, and A. Forkl, Europhys. Lett.22, 735 (1993).
29. E H. Brandt and M V. Indenbom, Phys. Rev. B48, 12 893 (1993).
30. E. Zeldov, J R. Clem, M. McElfresh, and M. Darwin, Phys. Rev. B49, 9802 (1994).
31. G P. Mikitik and E H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B60, 592 (1999).
32. G P. Mikitik and E H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B62, 6800 (2000).
33. Th. Schuster, H. Kuhn, E H. Brandt, and S. Klaumünzer, Phys. Rev. B56, 3413 (1997).
34. E H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B46, 8628 (1992).
35. D. Koelle, R. Kleiner, F. Ludwig, E. Dantsker, and John Clarke, Rev. Mod. Phys.71, 631 (1999).
36. H W. Chang, IEEE Trans. Magn.17, 764 (1981).
37. M B. Ketchen, W J. Gallagher, A W. Kleinsasser, S. Murphy, and J R. Clem, in SQUID ’85, Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices and their Applications, edited by H. D. Hahlbohm and H. Lübbig (de Gruyter, Berlin, 1985), pp. 865–871.
38. G. Hildebrandt and F H. Uhlmann, IEEE Trans. Magn.32, 690 (1996).
39. M M. Kapaev, Semicond. Sci. Technol.10, 389 (1997).
40. P. Selders and R. Wördenweber, Appl. Phys. Lett.76, 3277 (2000).
41. E. Olive and E H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B59, 7116 (1999).
42. J.-C. Wei and T.-J. Yang, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 135, 5696 (1996).
43. G. Carneiro and E H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. B61, 6370 (2000).