Learning temporal context in active object recognition using bayesian analysis

Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 695-699

  Paletta, Lucas ^a   Prantl, Manfred ^b   Pinz, Axel ^c  

^a JOANNEUM RESEARCH   (Austria)

^b Alicona GmbH   (Germany)

^c GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PATTERN RECOGNITION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BAYESIAN FUSION; CONTROL FUNCTIONS; INFORMATION SOURCES; INSTANCE BASED LEARNING; PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS; REALTIME PROCESSING; SEQUENTIAL DECISIONS;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 0003063219     PISSN: 10514651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. S. Baker and S. K. Nayar. Pattern rejection. In Proc. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 544-549, 1996.
2. S. Becker Implicit learning in 3D object recognition: The importance of temporal context. Neural Computation, 11(2):347-374, 1999.
3. H. Borotschnig, L. Paletta, M. Prantl, and A. Pinz. Appearance-based active object recognition. Image and Vision Computing, 18(9):715-727, 2000.
4. A. R. Cassandra, L. P. Kaelbling, and M. L. Littman. Acting optimally in partially observable stochastic domains. In Proc. Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1994.
5. S. Edelman. Computational theories of object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1:296-304, 1997.
6. J. H. Friedman, J. L. Bentley, and R. A. Finkel. An algorithm for finding best matches in logarithmic expected time. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 3(3):209-226, 1977.
7. T. M. Mitchell. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1997.
8. B. Moghaddam and A. Pentland. Probabilistic visual learning for object representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(7):696-710, 1997.
9. H. Murase and S. K. Nayar. Visual learning and recognition of 3-D objects from appearance. International Journal of Computer Vision, 14(1):5-24, 1995.
10. S. A. Nene, S. K. Nayar, and H. Murase. Columbia object image library (COIL-20). Technical Report CUCS-006-96, Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, 1996.
11. L. Paletta and A. Pinz. Active object recognition by view integration and reinforcement learning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 31(1-2):71-86, 2000.
12. J. Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1988.
13. M. Prantl. Active Object Recognition. PhD thesis, Graz University of Technology, Institute for Computer Graphics and Vision, 1999.
14. R. P. N. Rao. Dynamic appearance-based recognition. In Proc. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 540-546, 1997.
15. B. Schiele and J. L. Crowley. Transinformation for active object recognition. In Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 249-254, 1998.
16. G. Wallis and R. Baddeley. Optimal, unsupervised learning in invariant object recognition. Neural Computation, 9(4):883-894, 1997.
17. J. Yamamoto, J. Ohya, and K. Ishii. Recognizing human action in time-sequential images using hidden markov model. In Proc. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 379-385, 1992.