Applications of artificial neural networks to combat simulations

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

Volumn 23, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 91-99

  Kilmer, R A ^a  

^a UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY   (United States)

Author keywords

Combat; Computer; Metamodel; Neural network; Simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003032547     PISSN: 08957177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0895-7177(95)00220-0     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. R.A. Kilmer, Artificial neural network metamodels of stochastic computer simulations, Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, (August 1994).
2. I. Oswalt, Current applications, trends, and organizations in the U.S. military simulation and gaming, Simulation and Gaming 24 (2), 153-189 (1993).
3. nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1991).
4. F. Hillier and G. Lieberman, Introduction to Operations Research, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1986).
5. S. Jacobson and L. Schruben, Techniques for simulation response optimization, Operations Research Letters 8 (February), 1-9 (1989).
6. G. Box and N. Draper, Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1987).
7. J. Donohue, The use of correlated simulation experiments in response surface optimization, Ph.D. Dissertation, Management Science Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, (1988).
8. R. Myers, A. Khuri and W. Carter, Response surface methodology: 1966-1988, Technometrics 31 (2), 137-157 (1989).
9. H. Simon, Prediction and prescription in systems modeling, Operations Research 38 (1), 11 (1989).
10. M. Padgett and T.A. Roppel, Neural networks and simulation: Modeling for applications, Simulation 58 (5), 295-305 (1992).
11. B. Cheng and D. Titterington, Neural networks: A review from a statistical perspective, Statistical Science 9 (1), 18-19 (1994).
12. W.O. Hedgepeth and D.A. Jacobs, The application of backpropogation neural networks to predict the results of combat, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Dayton, OH, October 17-19, 1994, pp. 199-203, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, (1994).
13. J.D. Morrison, A neural network model that supports realtime learning of temporal relationships in complex engineering domains, Simulation 59 (3), 152-163 (1992).
14. M. Padgett and T.A. Roppel, Neural networks and simulation: Modeling for applications, Simulation 58 (5), 295-305 (1992).
15. J. Anderson, J. Silverstein, S. Ritz and R. Jones, Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: Some applications of a neural model, Psychological Review 84, 413-451 (1977).
16. T. Kohonen, G. Barna and R. Chrisley, Statistical pattern recognition with neural networks: Benchmarking studies, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, CA, July 24-27, 1988, pp. I-61-I-68, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, (1988).
17. A. Hart, Using neural networks for classification tasks - Some experiments on data sets and practical advice, Journal of Operations Research Society 43 (3), 215-226 (1992).
18. R. Kilmer and A. Smith, Using artificial neural networks to approximate a discrete event stochastic simulation model, In Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 3, (Edited by C. Dagli, L. Burke, B. Fernandez and J. Ghosh), pp. 631-636, ASME Press, New York, (1993).
19. R. Blanning, The construction and implementation of metamodels, Simulation 24, 177-184 (1975).
20. B. Yu and K. Poppleweli, Metamodels in manufacturing: A review, International Journal of Production Research 32, 787-796 (1994).
21. P. Fishwick, Neural network models in simulation: A comparison with traditional modeling approaches, In Proceedings of the 1989 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, DC, December 4-6, 1989, pp. 702-710, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, (1989).
22. H. Pierreval and R. Huntsinger, An investigation on neural network capabilities as simulation metamodels, In Proceedings of the 1992 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, Reno, NV, July 27-30, 1992, pp. 413-417, Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, CA, (1992).
23. R.D. Hurrion, Using a neural network to enhance the decision making quality of a visual interactive simulation model, Journal of the Operations Research Society 43 (4), 333-341 (1992).
24. A.B. Badiru and D.B. Sieger, Neural network as a simulation metamodel in economic analysis of risky projects, Technical Report, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Oklahoma, (1993).
25. R.A. Kilmer and A.E. Smith, Using artificial neural networks to approximate a discrete event stochastic simulation model, In Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 3, (Edited by C.H. Dagli, L.I. Burke, B.R. Fernandez and J. Ghosh), pp. 631-636, ASME Press, (1993).
26. R.A. Kilmer, A.E. Smith and L.J. Shuman, Neural networks as a metamodeling technique for discrete event stochastic simulation, In Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 4, (Edited by C.H. Dagli, B.R. Fernandez, J. Ghosh and R.T. Kumara), pp. 1141-1146, ASME Press, (1994).
27. M. Perrone and L. Cooper, Learning from what's been learned: Supervised learning in multi-neural network systems, In Proceedings of the World Congress on Neural Networks 1993, Volume 3, Portland, OR, July 11-15, 1993, pp. 354-357, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, (1993).
28. P. Davis and R. Hillestad, Families of models that cross levels of resolution: Issues for design, calibration and management, In Proceedings of the 1993 Winter Simulation Conference, Los Angeles, CA, December 12-15, 1993, pp. 1003-1012, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, (1993).
29. D. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, New York, (1989).
30. rd Workshop on Neural Networks Academic/Industrial/ NASA/Defense, SPIE, Volume 1721, Auburn University, Alabama, February 10-12, 1992, pp. 217-222, Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, CA, (1992).