Peer review on the internet: A better class of conversation

Lancet

Volumn 351, Issue SUPPL.1, 1998, Pages 10-14

  Bingham, Craig ^a  

^a NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003030115     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)90307-5     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Rathie SE. Electronic Journals and peer review: perils and promises. http://www.cs.ubc.ca/spider/rathie/elecpub/paper3.html. Dated 1994, accessed March 3, 1998.
2. Turoff M, Hiltz SR. The electronic journal: a progress report. J Am Soc Information Sci 1982; 33: 195-202.
3. Kassirer JP, Angell M. The Internet and the Journal. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1709-10.
4. Harnad S. Post-Gutenberg galaxy: the fourth revolution in the means of production of knowledge. Public-Access Computer Systems Review 1991; 2: 39-53. ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/ HTML/harnad91.postgutenberg.html. Accessed March 3, 1998.
5. Ginsparg P. Winners and losers in the global research village. http://xxx.lanl.gov/blurb/pg96unesco.html. Accessed March 3, 1998
6. LaPorte RE, Marler E, Akazawa S, et al. The death of biomedical journals. BMJ 1995; 310: 1387-90.
7. Odlyzko AM. Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals, http://www.ams.org/notices/199501/ forum-odlyzko.html. Accessed March 3, 1998.
8. Ingelfinger FJ. Shattuck Lecture - the general medical journal: for readers or repositories? N Engl J Med 1977; 296: 1258-64.