Quality of care, a new paradigm for collective action?;La qualité des soins, nouveau paradigme de l'action collective ?

Sociologie du Travail

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 51-68

  Setbon, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

Health specifications; Medical profession; Patient; Profession m dicale; QS; Quality of care; R f rentiels de soin; R gulation syst mique; Systemic approach to regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003026497     PISSN: 00380296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0296(00)00107-2     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Berwick D.M. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N. Engl. J. M. 320:1989.
2. Bouckaert G. Measuring quality, in Quality Improvement. Pollitt C, Bouckaert G. European Public Services. 1995;20-28 Sage, Londres.
3. Brennan T.A., Leape L.L., Laird N., et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice. I. N. Eng. J. M. 324:1991;370-376.
4. Brook R.H., Davies-Avery A., Greenfield S., et al. Assessing the quality of medical care using outcome measures: an overview of the method. Med. Care. 324:(15S):1977.
5. Casparie A.F., Post D., Van Harten W.H., Gubbels J.W. Differences in production between medical specialists. An inventory based on claim data to identify potential areas for quality-improvement activities. European Journal of Public health. 3:1993;292-295.
6. Coser R.L. Insulation from observability and types of social conformity. American Sociological Review. 26:1961;28-39.
7. Department of Health. Medical Audit: Working Paper 6, Working for Patients. 1989;HMSO, Londres.
8. Deusinger S.S. Analysing errors in practice. A vehicle for assessing and enhancing the quality of care. Int. J. of Techno Assessment of Care. 8:1992;62-75.
9. Donabedian A. Contributions of epidemiology to quality assessment and monitoring. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 11:1990;117-121.
10. Donabedian A. Institutional and professional responsabilities in quality assurance. Quality Insurance in Health Care. 1:1989;3-11.
11. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How it can be assessed? JAMA. 260:1988;1743-1748.
12. Donabedian A. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring, The Criteria and Standards of Quality. 1982;Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
13. Duncan K. Health Information and Health Reform. 1994;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
14. Edwardsson B., Thomasson B., Ovreveit J. Quality of Service. Making it Really Work. 1994;McGraw-Hill, Londres.
15. Eisenberg J.M. Changing physicians' practice patterns in Doctors' Decisions and the Cost of medical Care. 1986;90-142 Ann Arbor, Health Administration Press.
16. England S.L., Evans J. Patients' choices and perceptions after an invitation to participate in treatment decisions. Soc. Sci. M. 34:1992;1217-1225.
17. Fessel W.J., Van Brunt E.E. Assessing quality care from the medical record. N. Engl. J. Medicine. 286:1972;134-138.
18. Friedson E. La Profession médicale. 1984;Payot, Paris.
19. Grant G., Elbow P., Evens T., et al. On competence. A critical analysis of competence based reforms in higher education. 1979;Jossey-Bass Publisching Co, San Francisco.
20. Guba E., Lincoln Y. Fourth Generation Evaluation. 1989;Sage, Newbury Park CA.
21. Gusfield J.R. The Culture of Public Probems: Drinking, Driving and the Symbolic Order. 1981;The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
22. Hays R.D., Di Matteo M.R. Key issues and suggestions for patient compliance assessment: sources of information, focus of measures, and nature of response options. J. Compliance Helth Care. 2:1987;27-53.
23. Hirst M. What do we mean by quality? Policing. 7:1991;183-193.
24. Hulka B.S., Romm F.J., Parkerson G.R.J.R., Russel I.T., Clapp N.E., Johnson F.S. Peer review in ambulatory care: use of explicit criteria and implicit judgments. Med. Care. 17:(15S):1979;1-73.
25. Jost T., Assuring the Quality of Medcal Practice: an International Comparative Study, King's Fund Project Paper 2, Londres, 1990.
26. Kahan J.P., Bernstein S.J., Leape L.L., et al. Measuring the necessity of medical procedures. Med. Care. 32:1994;357-365.
27. Buxton M., Kerrison S., Packwood T., Medical Audit: taking stock, King's Fund Centre and Health Economics Research Group, Londres, 1993.
28. Laduca A. The structure of competence in the health professions. Evaluation and the Health Professions. 3:1980;253-288.
29. Laffel G. Implementing quality management in health care: the challenges ahead. Quality Progress. 1990;29-32.
30. Landau M., Chisholm D. Le management de l'administration publique doit-il être orienté vers la réussite ou chercher à éviter les erreurs ? Un réexamen. Politiques et Management Public. 39:(11):1993;23-44.
31. Landau M., Stout R. To manage is not to control: or the folly of type II errors. Public Administration Review. 1979.
32. Lathrop Gilb C. Hidden Hierarchies: The Professions and Government. 1968;Harper and Row, New York.
33. Leape L.L. Error in medicine. JAMA. 272:1994;1851-1857.
34. Maisonneuve H., Pazart L., Dosquet P., et al. ANAES, Recommmandations médicales et professionnelles. Journal d'économie médicale. 16:1998;159-165.
35. Majoine G. Décisions publiques et délibération. Revue française de science politique. 44:1994;579-598.
36. Merton R.K. Social Theory and Social Structure. 1957;The Free Press of Glencoe, New York.
37. Mitman B., Tonesk X., Jacobson P.D. Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change. Quality Review Bulletin. 1992;413-422.
38. Mornex R. L'évaluation en santé, une nécessaire contrainte. Journal d'économie médicale. (3-4):1995;183-188.
39. Norman D.A. To Err Is Human. 1984;Basic Books Inc Publishers, New York.
40. Payne B. The medical record as a basis for assessing clinical competence. Annals of Internal Medicine. 91:1979;623-629.
41. Peyne B.C. 3 The medical record as a basis for assessing clinical competence. Annals of Internal Medicine. 91:1979;623-629.
42. Phelps C.E. The methodological foundations of studies of the appropriateness of medical care. N. Eng. J. M. 329:1993;1241-1243.
43. Pollitt C. The politics of medical quality: auditing doctors in the UK and the USA. Health Services Management Research. 6:1993;1241-1243.
44. Pollitt C. The struggle for quality: the case of the National Health Service. Policy and Politics. 21:1993;161-170.
45. Pollitt C, Bouckaert G. Quality Improvement in European Public Services. 1995;Sage, Londres.
46. Pollitt C. The politics of quality: managers, professionals and consumers in the public services, Centre for Political Studies. 1991;Royal Holloway and Bedford New College, Egham.
47. Pressman J., Wildavsky A. Implementation. 1973;University of California Press, Berkeley.
48. Reason J. Human Error. 1992;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
49. Royal College of Surgeons. Guidelines to clinical audit in surgical practice. 1989;Royal College of Surgeons, Londres.
50. Scheff T.J. Decision rules and types of error, and their consequences in medical diagnosis. Behavioral Science. 8:1973;97-107.
51. Scott W.R., Flood A.B., Ewy W. Organizational determinants of services, quality and cost in hospitals, Milbank Memorial fund Quarterly. Health and Society. 57:1979;234-264.
52. Segrestin D. L'entreprise à l'épreuve des normes de marché. Les paradoxes des nouveaux standards de gestion dans l'industrie. Revue française de sociologie. 38:(3):1997;553-585.
53. Shapiro M. Who Guards the Guardians? 1988;University of Georgia Press, Athènes.
54. Starr P., Immergut E. Health care and the boundaries of politics. Maier C.H. Changing Boundaries of the Political. 1987;Cambridge University Press, New York.
55. Wadsworth H.M., Stephens K.S., Godfrey A.B. Moderm Methods for Quality Control and Improvement. 1986;John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York.
56. Westerheijden D. Peers, performance and power. Goedegebuure L.C.J, Maussen P.A.M, Westerheijden D. Peer Review and Performance Indicators. 1990;Lemma, Utrecht.
57. Williamson C. Whose Standards? Consumer and Professional Standards in Health Care. 1992;Open University Press, Buckingham.
58. Williamson J.W. Evaluating quality of patient care: a strategy relating outcome and process assessment. JAMA. 218:1971;564-569.