Nontraditional activities and the efficiency of US commercial banks

Journal of Banking and Finance

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 467-482

  Rogers, Kevin E ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost efficiency; G21; Nontraditional banking activities; Profit efficiency; Revenue efficiency

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003023377     PISSN: 03784266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00020-X     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Avery R.B., Berger A.N. Loan commitments and bank risk exposure. Journal of Banking and Finance. 15:1991;173-192.
2. Berger A.N. Distribution-free estimates of efficiency in the US banking industry and tests of the standard distributional assumptions. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 4:1993;261-292.
3. Berger A.N., Humphrey D.B. The dominance of inefficiencies over scale and product mix economies in banking. Journal of Monetary Economics. 28:1991;117-148.
4. Berger A.N., Humphrey D.B. Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research. 98:1997;175-212.
5. Berger A.N., Mester L.J. Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking and Finance. 21:1997;895-947.
6. Boot A.W.A., Thakor A.V. Off-balance sheet liabilities, deposit insurance and capital regulation. Journal of Banking and Finance. 15:1991;825-846.
7. DeYoung, R., 1994. Fee-based services and cost efficiency in commercial banks. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Proceedings: Conference on Bank Structure and Competition.
8. Edwards, F.R., Mishkin, F.S., 1995. The decline of traditional banking: Implications for financial stability and regulatory policy. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 4993.
9. Gorton G., Rosen R. Corporate control, portfolio choice, and the decline in banking. Journal of Finance. 50:1995;1377-1419.
10. Hancock D. A model of the financial firm with imperfect asset and deposit elasticities. Journal of Banking and Finance. 10:1986;37-54.
11. Hannan T.H., Liang N. Inferring market power from time-series data: The case of the banking firm. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 11:1993;205-218.
12. Hassan M.K., Karell G.V., Peterson M.O. Deposit insurance, market discipline and off-balance sheet banking risk of large US commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance. 18:1994;575-593.
13. Humphrey, D.B., 1994. Delivering deposit services: ATMs versus branches. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, pp. 50-81.
14. Humphrey D.B., Pulley L.B. Banks' responses to deregulation: Profits, technology, and efficiency. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking. 29:1997;73-93.
15. Hunter W.C., Timme S.G. Core deposits and physical capital: A reexamination of bank scale economies and efficiency with quasi-fixed inputs. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking. 27:1995;165-185.
16. Kaufman, G.G., 1993. The diminishing role of commercial banking in the US economy. In: White, L.H. (Ed.), The Crisis in American Banking. New York University Press, New York, pp. 139-159.
17. Kaufman G.G., Mote L.R. Is banking a declining industry? A historical perspective. Economic Perspectives. 18:1994;2-21.
18. Pulley B.L., Humphrey D.B. The role of fixed costs and cost complementarities in determining scope economies and the cost of narrow banking proposals. Journal of Business. 66:1993;437-461.
19. Pulley, B.L., Berger, A.N., Humphrey, D.B., 1993. Do consumers pay more for one-stop banking? Evidence from an alternative revenue function. Board of Governors, Working paper, pp. 93-30.
20. Rogers, K.E., Sinkey, J.F., 1996. An analysis of nontraditional activities at US commercial banks. Working paper, Mississippi State University.