An engineering approach to decomposing end-to-end delays on a distributed real-time system

Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Real-Time Systems, WPDRTS 1996

Volumn , Issue , 1996, Pages 244-251

  Saksena, Manas ^a   Hong, Seongsoo ^b  

^a Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECOMPOSITION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; RESPONSE TIME (COMPUTER SYSTEMS); SCHEDULING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

DISTRIBUTED REAL TIME SYSTEM; DISTRIBUTED SCHEDULING PROBLEM; END TO END DELAY; END-TO-END DEADLINE; ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES; INITIAL SOLUTION; PRACTICAL ENGINEERING; SINGLE PROCESSORS;

REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

EID: 0003022830     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WPDRTS.1996.557688     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. N. Audsley. Optimal priority assignment and feasibility of static priority tasks with arbitrary start times. Technical Report YCS 164, Department of Computer Science, University of York, England, December 1991.
2. R. Gerber, S. Hong, and M. Saksena. Guaranteeing end-to-end timing constraints by calibrating intermediate processes. In Proceedings of IEEE Real- Time Systems Symposium, pages 192-203. IEEE Computer Society Press, December 1994.
3. R. Gerber, S. Hong, and M. Saksena. Guaranteeing real-time requirements with resource-based calibration of periodic processes. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(7), July 1995.
4. J. Lehoczky, L. Sha, and Y. Ding. The rate monotonic scheduling algorithm: Exact characterization and average case behavior. In Proceedings of IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, pages 166-171. IEEE Computer Society Press, December 1989.
5. M. Saksena and S. Hong. Resource conscious design of real-time systems: An end-to-end approach. Technical Report ASRI-TR-95-01, Automation and Systems Research Institute, Seoul National University, Korea, November 1995.
6. J. Stankovic, M. Spuri, M. Di Natale, and G. Buttazzo. Implications of classical scheduling results for real-time systems. IEEE Computer, pages 16- 25, June 1995.
7. K. Tindell, A. Burns, and A. Wellings. An extendible approach for analysing fixed priority hard real-time tasks. The Journal of Real-Time Systems, 6(2):133-152, March 1994.