Using diaries to estimate fishing effort and fish consumption: A contemporary assessment

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 22-34

  Connelly, Nancy A ^a   Brown, Tommy L ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Angler diaries; Diary method; Fish consumption; Fishing effort

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003020977     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871209609359049     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson, L.E., & Thompson, P.C. (1991). Development and implementation of the angler diary monitoring program for Great Bear Lake, Northwest Territories. American Fisheries Society Symposium 12, 457-47.
2. Aneshensel, C.S., Becerra, R.M., Fielder, E.P., & Schuler, R.H. (1989). Participation of Mexican American female adolescents in a longitudinal panel survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 53, 548-562.
3. Block, G. (1982). A review of validations of dietary assessment methods. American Journal of Epidemiology 115, 492-505.
4. Connelly, N.A., & Brown, T.L. (1995). Use of angler diaries to examine biases associated with 12-month recall on mail questionnaires. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124, 413-422.
5. Connelly, N.A., Brown, T.L., & Knuth, B.A. (1990). New York statewide angler survey 1988. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
6. Cosper, R.L., & Shaw, S.M. (1985). The validity of time-budget studies: A comparison of frequency and diary data in Halifax, Canada. Leisure Sciences 7, 205-225.
7. Ditton, R. (1993). Angler panel study. SFI Bulletin 441, 4-5.
8. Gallagher, M.L., Farrior, E., Broadhead, L., Gillette, L.S., Rowe, M.L., Somes, G., West, P., & Kolasa, K.M. (1993). Development and testing of a food frequency recall instrument for describing dietary patterns in adults and teenagers. Nutrition Research 13, 177-188.
9. Green, D.M., Schonhoff III, B.J., & Youngs, W.D. (1986). The New York State bass study, 1977-1980, use of angler collected data to determine population dynamics. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
10. Guadagnolo, F.B. (1989). A comparison of recall and diary methodologies in the collection of expenditure data. Proceedings of the 1989 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. (General Technical Report NE-132). Broomhall, PA: Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
11. Kandel, D., Raveis, V., & Logan, J. (1983). Sex differences in the characteristics of members lost to a longitudinal panel: A speculative research note. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 567-575.
12. La Page, W.F. (1987). Using panels for tourism and travel research. In J.R.B. Ritchie & C.R. Goeldner (Eds.), Travel, tourism, and hospitality research (pp. 425-431). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
13. Lemmens, P., Tan, E.S., & Knibbe, R.A. (1992). Measuring quantity and frequency of drinking in a general population survey: A comparison of five indices. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 53, 476-486.
14. Mak, J., Moncur, J., & Yonamine, D. (1977). How or how not to measure visitor expenditures. Journal of Travel Research 16, 1-4.
15. Mullenbach, V., Kushi, L.H., Jacobson, C., Gomez-Marin, O., Prineas, R.J., Roth-Yousey, L., & Sinaiko, A.R. (1992). Comparison of 3-day food record and 24-hour recall by telephone for dietary evaluation in adolescents. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 92, 743-745.
16. Parfitt, J.H. (1967). A comparison of purchase recall with diary panel records. Journal of Advertising Research X3), 16-31.
17. Perdue, R.R., & Botkin, M.R. (1988). Visitor survey versus conversion study. Annals of Tourism Research 15, 76-87.
18. Powers, E.A., Goudy, W.J., & Keith, P.M. (1978). Congruence between panel and recall data in longitudinal research. Public Opinion Quarterly 42, 380-389.
19. Rose, C.D., & Hassler, W.W. (1969). Application of survey techniques to the dolphin, Coryphaena htppurus, fishery of North Carolina. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 98, 94-103.
20. Sudman, S. (1964). On the accuracy of recording of consumer panels: I. Journal of Marketing Research 1, 14-20.
21. Sudman, S., & Ferber, R. (1974). A comparison of alternative procedures for collecting consumer expenditure data for frequently purchased products. Journal of Marketing Research 11, 128-135.
22. Sudman, S., & Lannom, L.B. (1978). A comparison of alternative panel procedures for obtaining health data. Urbana, IL: Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
23. Sztramko, L.K., Dunlop, W.I., Powell, S.W., & Sutherland, R.G. (1991). Applications and benefits of an angler diary program on Lake Erie. American Fisheries Society Symposium 12, 520-528.
24. Tarrant, M.A., & Manfredo, M.J. (1993). Digit preference, recall bias, and nonresponse bias in self-reports of angling participation. Leisure Sciences 15, 231-238.
25. Thompson, T., & Hubert, W.A. (1990). Influence of survey method on estimates of statewide fishing activity. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 10, 111-113.
26. Verbrugge, L.M. (1980). Health diaries. Medical Care 18, 73-95.
27. Walsh, T.C. (1977). Selected results from the 1972-73 diary surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14, 344-352.
28. Westat Inc. (1989). Investigation of possible recall/reference period bias in National Surveys of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-associated Recreation. Rockville, MD: Westat.